Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -949. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,357–56,590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 23:05
55,499
-26
10 Nov 2026, 00:17
55,525
-22
8 Nov 2026, 14:58
55,547
-4
7 Nov 2026, 12:09
55,551
-10
6 Nov 2026, 10:59
55,561
-4
5 Nov 2026, 11:38
55,565
-13
4 Nov 2026, 09:49
55,578
-11
3 Nov 2026, 06:19
55,589
-5
2 Nov 2026, 07:36
55,594
-6
1 Nov 2026, 09:06
55,600
-4
31 Oct 2026, 11:28
55,604
-13
30 Oct 2026, 07:58
55,617
-8
29 Oct 2026, 07:09
55,625
-4
28 Oct 2026, 07:20
55,629
-9
27 Oct 2026, 10:08
55,638
-8
26 Oct 2026, 12:00
55,646
-10
25 Oct 2026, 12:56
55,656
-4
24 Oct 2026, 14:38
55,660
-2
23 Oct 2026, 14:36
55,662
-13
22 Oct 2026, 17:05
55,675
first reading
Engagement
104 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.40%
avg views ÷ 55,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,660
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.286%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 104 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
104 (20 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
111,830
Reactions total
294
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 23:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈343
Videos
≈5
Links
≈1,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,308 reactions across 96 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
⚡
1,308
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Налоги и ПИФы
Месяц назад рассказывал о законопроекте, который меняет порядок исчисления НДФЛ, в том числе для инвестиционных доходов. За прошедшее время законопроект прошёл первое чтение. Второе назначено на 19 ноября. С высокой долей вероятности данный законопроект будет принят и вступит в силу с 1 января 2027 г. Скорее всего, по результатам второго чтения в текст законопроекта будут внесены некоторые изменения, н…
🇷🇺 Рынки (главное)
Ключевые тенденции на российском рынке акций и облигаций.
Облигации
✔️На российском рынке облигаций продолжает наблюдаться стагнация цен и повышенная нервозность инвесторов на фоне жесткой риторики ЦБ РФ и расширения программы заимствований Минфина. На рынке ОФЗ на прошлой неделе наблюдалась небольшая коррекция: доходности выросли примерно на 10–15 б. п. Тем не менее рынок остаётся внутри боково…
🛰 РуСпейс: идея с быстрым возвратом инвестиций
Сегодня хочу ещё раз вернуться к теме космических инвестиций. Причина в том, что некоторые инвесторы воспринимают эту идею как историю с длинным сроком возврата инвестиций. Рассуждают они примерно так: «Спутник будет летать долго, а значит, мои инвестиции окупятся не скоро…». В этом выводе кроется серьёзная ошибка.
На самом деле: проект «Тритон-О» = быстрый возврат инв…
📱 Стоит ли инвестировать в Яндекс
Продолжаю анализировать перспективы популярных у частных инвесторов российских акций, опираясь на их отчётность за третий квартал 2026 года по МСФО. Сегодня разбираемся с Яндексом...
Почему акции Яндекса популярны?
✔️Яндекс исторически считается одной из самых крупных акций роста на российском рынке.
✔️У компании диверсифицированная экосистема + развитие ИИ и автономных технологи…
ℹ️ Простые ответы. Сбербанк VS Озон (горизонт – год)
Лично у меня сложилось мнение, что в ближайший год российские акции будут интересны. Поэтому решил вернуться к двум последним постам на этом канале: про Сбербанк и Озон. По сути, в них представлены две самые популярные стратегии: инвестиции в надёжные дивидендные компании и покупка историй с понятными драйверами роста. Разумеется, тут встаёт вопрос выбора лучшей с…
📦 Стоит ли инвестировать в Озон?
Вчера мы обсуждали перспективы акций Сбера. Эта компания выступает сильной дивидендной историей и на сегодняшний день является самой популярной бумагой у частных инвесторов. В противовес хотелось бы в том же ключе разобрать какую-нибудь историю роста. Решил остановиться на Озоне. И хотя акции этой компании являются высоколиквидными, входят в основной индекс Мосбиржи и часто рекоменд…
🏦 Стоит ли инвестировать в Сбербанк?
В последние годы Сбербанк стал самой популярной акцией среди российских частных инвесторов. Бумаги банка традиционно занимают первое место в «Народном портфеле» Мосбиржи (рэнкинге самых востребованных акций у физлиц), значительно опережая прошлых лидеров рейтинга вроде Газпрома и Лукойла. Предлагаю оценить идею инвестирования в эту компанию в разрезе последней отчётности по МСФО …
🪙 Обзор рынка криптовалюты
В своём прошлом посте на тему крипторынка (было это ещё в мае) я указал на то, что в базовом сценарии «дно рынка» будет достигнуто этой осенью. Конечно, тогда я не мог знать о предстоящем взломе Binance, но получилось довольно символично.
В том же прогнозе я предположил, что следующий пик цены биткоина мы увидим летом – осенью 2029 года и цена на этом пике составит $180 000 - $220 000 (т.…
📊 Макроэкономический обзор и инвестиционная стратегия
В посте обсудим свежую макроэкономическую статистику, включая динамику финансовых результатов корпоративного сектора, промышленное производство и темпы кредитования. Дополнительно сформулирую актуальные инвестиционные рекомендации по формированию портфелей.
Финансовые результаты компаний
Прибыли российских компаний в январе–июле 2026 года упали до минимума с па…
Консервативный портфель на $1 млн
Признаю, что когда я пишу о глобальных рынках, в основном фокусируюсь на акциях. Однако, в том числе на опасениях пузыря в ИИ, далеко не все инвесторы готовы вкладываться в риск. Сегодняшний пост именно для таких инвесторов. В нём мы соберём актуальный модельный портфель из долларовых облигаций.
Консервативное инвестирование в облигации, номинированные в твёрдой валюте, – это хорош…
Как вы считаете, прогрессивная шкала налогообложения, или так называемый «налог на богатых», является справедливой и полезной мерой?
Да, это справедливо и помогает сократить неравенство ⚖️18%
Нет, это опасный популизм, который подавляет инициативу 📉34%
Проблема не в налогах, а в эффективности социальной политики государства 🏛48%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @alfawealth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alfawealth edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Стоит ли покупать акции российских компаний прямо сейчас? Горизонт – 1 год. Цель – максимально приумножить капитал к осени 2027 года, не сойдя с ума от стресса. Ваш ответ? 👇
🟢 Да35%
🛑 Нет65%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько же будет стоить купюра с изображением Джорджа Вашингтона летом 2027 года?
Меньше 70 рублей.5%
70-90 рублей.40%
Более 90 рублей.56%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Альфа-Капитал @alfacapital · 315,180 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Abeta - акции, облигации, аналитика @aabeta · 27,445 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Ренат Валеев @renat_vv · 19,339 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
Альфа-Инвестиции @alfa_investments · 707,440 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
ВТБ Моя Аналитика @omyinvestments · 206,241 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
КапиталопедиЯ |Инвест Идеи @kapitalopedia · 20,767 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
FREEDOM FINANCE OFFICIAL @FREEDOMFINANCE · 25,484 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Cbonds @cbonds · 34,826 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
ВТБ Мои Инвестиции @brokervtb · 132,946 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Invest Era @usamarke1 · 61,698 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
ДОХОДЪ @dohod · 70,259 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Invest Heroes @InvestHeroes · 39,736 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
Кот Эльвиры @KotElviry · 47,884 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
Ленивый инвестор @smfanton · 51,630 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ @AK47pfl · 114,402 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
Залим Сохов - ON FLEEK investing @onfleek419 · 37,067 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Первый инвестиционный @am_first · 47,759 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Аналитика Т-Банк Инвестиций @t_analytics_official · 71,844 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Капитал @sgcapital · 19,118 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
MG Daily @themovchans · 22,028 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
bitkogan⚡️HOTLINE @bitkogan_hotline · 82,741 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Инвестиции на диване @div_invest · 97,835 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Банк России @centralbank_russia · 243,852 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
СМАРТЛАБ @smartlabnews · 76,486 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 76 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alfa Wealth” (@alfawealth), 55,499 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alfawealth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.