Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 51 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,838–30,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 14:17
30,846
-34
17 Sept 2026, 13:17
30,880
-7
15 Sept 2026, 12:38
30,887
+3
11 Sept 2026, 20:59
30,884
-1
9 Sept 2026, 13:21
30,885
-9
6 Sept 2026, 07:42
30,894
+10
4 Sept 2026, 04:37
30,884
+7
1 Sept 2026, 19:34
30,877
-4
31 Aug 2026, 20:35
30,881
+3
30 Aug 2026, 19:46
30,878
-13
29 Aug 2026, 22:46
30,891
-4
28 Aug 2026, 21:33
30,895
-4
27 Aug 2026, 23:44
30,899
+3
27 Aug 2026, 02:15
30,896
+2
26 Aug 2026, 04:26
30,894
+4
25 Aug 2026, 03:24
30,890
+16
23 Aug 2026, 18:05
30,874
+2
22 Aug 2026, 05:16
30,872
+4
20 Aug 2026, 21:15
30,868
-4
19 Aug 2026, 23:08
30,872
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views ÷ 30,846 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,430
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.997%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
47 (11 July 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
126,430
Reactions total
1,261
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 02:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
419
Videos
70
Links
841
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,995 reactions across 47 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,533
50.7%
🔥
823
16.5%
❤
710
14.2%
🤣
706
14.1%
🤡
93
1.86%
👎
36
0.721%
🌚
33
0.661%
💩
28
0.561%
😭
24
0.48%
🖕
6
0.12%
🐳
3
0.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,995 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 47 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @harmfulinvestor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.13%
1 of 47 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
8,950
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
11,400
over 46 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHHyJJ5
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Однажды я сидел на инвестиционном мастермайнде, где управляющие делились идеями на рынке. Одной из них был Озон.
Разбор Ильи Воробьёва можно посмотреть вот тут — https://www.youtube.com/live/ON8O8tefrdA?si=9Thi5kn2JkBLgRdz&t=3636
Тема понятная: склады маркетплейсов атакуют беспилотники.
Сначала горело у Wildberries, потом у Озона.
В августе акции Озона просели примерно на 30% и уже отскочили.
Главный вопрос у инве…
Друзья, привет!
⚡️ПАО «ГК «Самолет» перевела платежи в Национальный расчётный депозитарий по купону и полностью погасила выпуск БО-П20 28 сентября 2026 года. По техническим причинам на счёт НРД часть денег была зачислена 29 сентября 2026 года.
🌟 По установленной процедуре НРД зафиксирует реестр на следующий рабочий день после зачисления средств.
$SMLT #Самолет
Базис: софт на каждом третьем сервере
Однажды я прочитал исследование ТМТ Консалтинг про софт, который управляет серверами. Файл приложил.
В 2021-м Россия завезла рекордные 126 тысяч серверов и хранилищ, это данные таможни. Почти все они работали на софте VMware, Microsoft и Citrix.
В 2022-м все трое ушли.
Банки, заводы и телеком остались с лицензиями, которые больше никто не обновляет.
Сегодня в стране работают 6…
Банк за акции, партнёрство через суд 🥸
Т-Технологии готовят новые акции для объединения с Точкой, М.Видео привлекает капитал на развитие бизнеса, пока продавцы ждут выплат, а SberDevices требует через суд 6,6 млрд рублей. В этом выпуске:
– Акционеры Т-Технологий одобрили сделку с Точкой — оценку объявят позже
– М.Видео признала нехватку оборотных средств и начала размещение новых акций
– Whoosh расширяется в Бразил…
Какие планы у Займера? Менеджмент выйдет в прямой эфир ▶️
Завтра в 18:00 по мск пройдёт прямая трансляция Дня инвестора Группы Займер (ZAYM).
Сегодня Займер — это цифровое кредитование, банковские, платёжные и B2B-финансовые сервисы. Компания ежеквартально выплачивает дивиденды, а на встрече расскажет, как развивается бизнес и какие планы у Группы.
Узнаем:
– Как меняется бизнес Займера
– Какие направления Группа р…
Российский 5G, медь в Китае и новый онкопрепарат 📣
Даже при потере половины складов Ozon может выйти на прибыль в 2028 году, а МТС планирует возвращать акционерам ₽70 млрд ежегодно. В этом выпуске:
– Промомед начинает исследования отечественного онкопрепарата
– Ozon запускает «Лайкзон» и проходит стресс-тест Эйлера
– Мосбиржа запускает вечные фьючерсы на пять криптоиндексов
– МТС делит ₽70 млрд между дивидендами и …
Мы были на Озон Фарме.
И Андрей был на Озон Фарме.
Сам бог велел о хорошей компании два раза послушать на досуге.
https://youtu.be/k2t1fXFmRgM?si=rZKvUZR_cx8kVdB3
«Восток Ойл»: первая нефть пошла 👍
Арктический мегапроект Роснефти запущен, ВТБ ищет покупателя на Росгосстрах, а Промомед опережает Mounjaro в Казахстане. В этом выпуске:
– Задержания в Евротрансе
– X5 закрывает «Впрок»
– Пакет акций Совкомбанка размещён среди семи институциональных инвесторов
– Ozon запускает автокредиты и новый логистический хаб
✨ ОПИФ Блэк лайн: https://tinyurl.com/28w7zfrw
📌 Поддержать вредн…
АВО: требования к эмитентам — это не «лишняя нагрузка», а цена публичного рынка
Ассоциация инвесторов АВО разобрала основные возражения эмитентов к проекту нового Положения Банка России о допуске ценных бумаг к организованным торгам.
Вывод достаточно однозначный.
Значительная часть аргументов сводится к тому, что новые требования неудобны, затратны или ограничивают свободу эмитента.
Но публичный рынок существует …
👍95❤14💩5🤡4
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @harmfulinvestor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
P.S investing @malishok_fonda · 26,164 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО» @Bondholders · 26,123 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 September 2026
Алексей Линецкий @alexeylinetsky · 30,161 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Тимофей Мартынов @martynovtim · 35,988 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций @mozgovikresearch · 23,286 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
Олег Кузьмичев @kuzmlab · 23,310 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Granite Trade | Торопов Степан @karsotel · 25,803 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Market Power @marketpowercomics · 31,650 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
Газпромбанк Инвестиции @gpb_investments · 45,256 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
ИнвестократЪ | Георгий Аведиков @investokrat · 31,866 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
IF Travel @without_borders_ru · 32,425 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Фининди | Александр Елисеев @Finindie · 72,817 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Усиленные Инвестиции @eninv · 23,508 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,774 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Сергей Пирогов @PirogovLive · 27,761 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Инвестируй или проиграешь | Юрий Козлов @invest_or_lost · 27,253 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
PROFIT @profit1 · 185,616 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Invest Heroes @InvestHeroes · 40,016 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
СМАРТЛАБ @smartlabnews · 76,417 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Zakharov Invest @zakharov_risk · 25,613 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
💰 WALL STREET PRO @thewallstreetpro · 46,529 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
Манька Аблигация @marythebond · 44,599 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
СМАРТЛАБ НОВОСТИ @newssmartlab · 64,210 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
ДОХОДЪ @dohod · 70,328 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 83 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вредный Инвестор” (@harmfulinvestor), 30,846 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harmfulinvestor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.