Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net +914. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,025–15,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 17:49
15,076
+7
9 Nov 2026, 07:16
15,069
+11
7 Nov 2026, 23:56
15,058
+2
7 Nov 2026, 00:17
15,056
+2
5 Nov 2026, 23:16
15,054
+10
4 Nov 2026, 20:30
15,044
+6
3 Nov 2026, 21:49
15,038
+12
2 Nov 2026, 18:25
15,026
+13
1 Nov 2026, 15:19
15,013
+26
31 Oct 2026, 13:51
14,987
+7
30 Oct 2026, 11:41
14,980
+5
29 Oct 2026, 12:54
14,975
+16
28 Oct 2026, 11:50
14,959
+3
27 Oct 2026, 12:40
14,956
+6
26 Oct 2026, 15:38
14,950
-3
25 Oct 2026, 16:54
14,953
-9
24 Oct 2026, 17:46
14,962
-6
23 Oct 2026, 19:37
14,968
+2
22 Oct 2026, 17:08
14,966
+10
21 Oct 2026, 09:21
14,956
first reading
Engagement
248 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 15,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,390
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 248 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
248 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
192,955
Reactions total
2,334
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,870
Videos
≈11
Links
≈1,770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
9,678 reactions across 238 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
6,513
67.3%
🤔
835
8.63%
😁
597
6.17%
🔥
534
5.52%
👌
464
4.79%
😱
206
2.13%
👀
135
1.39%
💯
129
1.33%
🤨
125
1.29%
👏
100
1.03%
🙏
25
0.258%
😢
15
0.155%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 247 of the 248 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,042 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 248 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.806%
2 of 248 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,080
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,090
over 245 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJM7biZ
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2W5zFK91sKf
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 248 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 57 posts held from the last 30 days (14.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
АНОНС ДНЯ 🎬
11 ноября
💵 Курс доллара 82.55 рублей (-0.25%)
💴 Курс юаня 12.38 рублей (0.68%)
📗 Сбор заявок
СОПФ ДОМ.РФ ruAAА ААА(RU) проведет сбор заявок в выпуск 19 сроком 2.5 года. Купон ежеквартальный, плавающий, ориентир спреда к ключевой ставке не выше 170 б.п.
‼️ Самолет НЕ выкупил облигации по выпуску серии БО-П05
На дискложе эмитент сообщает следующее:
По техническим причинам обязательство по выкупу Биржевых облигаций исполнить не представлялось возможным.
Количество приобретенных Эмитентом Биржевых облигаций: 0 штук.
Эмитент осуществит 11.11.2026 действия по выкупу Биржевых облигаций у владельцев.
Еще в одном сообщении от эмитента указано следующее:
Владельцы, подавш…
⚡️ ООО "КОНТРОЛ ЛИЗИНГ"
📝 «Эксперт РА» понизил рейтинг кредитоспособности ООО «КОНТРОЛ лизинг» (далее – Компания, Лизингодатель) до уровня ruВ-, сохранил развивающийся прогноз и продлил статус «под наблюдением».
Понижение рейтинга обусловлено значительным ухудшением качества активов, что оказало давление на рентабельность деятельности и ликвидную позицию Компании. При этом Агентство отмечает неопределенность относит…
Первые результаты изменения семейной ипотеки: выдачи рухнули почти вдвое
Эта новость прошла как-то незамеченно в информационном пространстве. С одной стороны, ожидаемо. С другой, количественная оценка эффекта выглядит немного шокирующе. Да, речь в СМИ о динамике м/м, а в сентябре традиционно перед очередным пересмотром условий ипотеки опять всколыхнулся ажиотажный спрос со стороны желающих впрыгнуть в последний вагон…
⚡️ АКРА ПОНИЗИЛО КРЕДИТНЫЙ РЕЙТИНГ АО «СЕЛЕКТЕЛ» ДО УРОВНЯ A(RU), ПРОГНОЗ «СТАБИЛЬНЫЙ», И СНЯЛО СТАТУС «ПОД НАБЛЮДЕНИЕМ»
Понижение рейтинга и снятие статуса «Под наблюдением» обусловлены снижением оценки за покрытие процентных платежей вследствие того, что осенью 2026 года Компания приобрела облачного провайдера M1Cloud, а также разместила два выпуска облигаций на общую сумму 10 млрд руб. для финансирования инвестиц…
Тревожный календарь на ближайшие месяцы
Выбраны ближайшие оферты/погашения проблемных эмитентов от ВВВ-, чьи невыплаты могут оказать существенное влияние на состояние рынка.
Бумаги отсортированы начиная с ближайшего события в выпуске. По проблемам и состоянию эмитентов уже написано все, что известно, и не по разу, так что очень кратенько:
1️⃣ Сегежа — давно существует за счет внешней поддержки. Ближайшие выплаты п…
АНОНС ДНЯ 🎬
10 ноября
💵 Курс доллара 82.75 рублей (0.75%)
💴 Курс юаня 12.31 рублей (0.36%)
📗 Сбор заявок
Икс 5 Финанс проведет сбор заявок в выпуск 003Р-24 с офертой через 2 года. Купон ежемесячный, плавающий, ориентир спреда к ключевой ставке не выше 140 б.п.
Джи Групп BBB+(RU) ruBBB+ проведет сбор заявок в выпуск 002Р-09 с офертой через 3 года. Купон ежемесячный, плавающий, ориентир спреда к ключевой став…
💴CNY 12,3098 руб. (0,36%)
💵USD 82,7536 руб. (0,75%)
💶EUR 92,3944 руб. (0,22%)
👍11👌2😁1
Signed A Vint
Showing the 12 most recent of 248 posts we hold for @corpbonds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@corpbonds edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @corpbonds as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы обычно принимаете решения по покупке облигаций?
Ориентируюсь на лидеров мнений и настроения в соц.сетях и чатах инвесторов15%
Слежу за аналитикой из разных источников, но выводы делаю сам(а)71%
Я сам(а) анализирую эмитентов и рыночные тренды, а затем принимаю решения14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 248 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@corpbonds named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@corpbbonds named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PRObonds | Иволга Капитал @probonds · 30,152 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 7 September 2026
Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО» @Bondholders · 23,928 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 September 2026
СМАРТЛАБ ОБЛИГАЦИИ @bondsmartlab · 19,422 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 October 2026
Манька Аблигация @marythebond · 45,815 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Кот.Финанс @mkot_finance · 18,928 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 October 2026
Биржевик | Облигации @birzhevikbondsofficial1 · 21,886 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Sid // Инвестиции + @sid_inves · 36,940 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,666 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Cbonds @cbonds · 34,826 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Zakharov Invest @zakharov_risk · 25,692 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
IF Bonds — Облигации РФ @if_bonds · 95,231 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
igotosochi @igotosochi · 21,929 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Финуслуги @MoexFinuslugi · 46,970 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Angry Bonds @angrybonds · 24,239 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Инвестиции - просто! @bessonov_invest · 20,101 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 September 2026
Записки юной пенсионерки @kiltauolgafinance · 54,262 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Твердые цифры @xtxixty · 20,209 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
БКС Экспресс @bcs_express · 56,054 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций @mozgovikresearch · 23,525 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
ВТБ Мои Инвестиции @brokervtb · 131,488 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Облигации | pro.finansy @obligaciipr · 56,747 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Вредный Инвестор @harmfulinvestor · 30,914 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
СМАРТЛАБ @smartlabnews · 76,486 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Давайте про IT 💻 @davaite_pro_it · 24,825 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Корпоративные облигации | Открытый канал” (@corpbonds), 15,076 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/corpbonds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.