Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for #неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov

Channel

#неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov

@dtiAlgo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

37,289subscribers

-2,124 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001068371661
TypeChannel
Username@dtiAlgo
DescriptionНа фондовом рынке с ~2006 Рекламы не даю. Курсов не продаю. В управление деньги не беру. ❕В личку сам подписчикам не пишу. Верую в #добро @realAlexButmanov и мысли про #экономику & #инвестиции #inGramWeTrust
Created21 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dtiAlgo

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

37,28939,41338,3515 August 2026 — 39,413 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,413 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,345 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,281 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,230 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,185 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,130 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,085 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,032 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,978 subscribers16 August 2026 — 38,920 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,877 subscribers18 August 2026 — 38,839 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,758 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,727 subscribers21 August 2026 — 38,664 subscribers22 August 2026 — 38,584 subscribers24 August 2026 — 38,502 subscribers25 August 2026 — 38,462 subscribers26 August 2026 — 38,420 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,396 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,342 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,290 subscribers30 August 2026 — 38,249 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,220 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,166 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,126 subscribers3 September 2026 — 38,060 subscribers4 September 2026 — 37,961 subscribers8 September 2026 — 37,790 subscribers11 September 2026 — 37,639 subscribers13 September 2026 — 37,540 subscribers14 September 2026 — 37,467 subscribers16 September 2026 — 37,412 subscribers18 September 2026 — 37,289 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -2,124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,970–39,732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:5637,289-123
16 Sept 2026, 00:5737,412-55
14 Sept 2026, 11:0137,467-73
13 Sept 2026, 00:1837,540-99
11 Sept 2026, 00:3837,639-151
8 Sept 2026, 01:4037,790-171
4 Sept 2026, 23:5737,961-99
3 Sept 2026, 09:2738,060-66
2 Sept 2026, 03:1538,126-40
1 Sept 2026, 05:4838,166-54
31 Aug 2026, 06:4438,220-29
30 Aug 2026, 08:5238,249-41
29 Aug 2026, 12:1238,290-52
28 Aug 2026, 11:1238,342-54
27 Aug 2026, 08:4638,396-24
26 Aug 2026, 06:0338,420-42
25 Aug 2026, 09:0438,462-40
24 Aug 2026, 11:1438,502-82
22 Aug 2026, 20:4538,584-80
21 Aug 2026, 11:4438,664first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.18%
avg views ÷ 37,289 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held72 (16 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total56,041
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 03:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈999
Videos
≈54
Links
≈1,360

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
84
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 72 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dtiAlgo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 15:43 UTC506 viewsread 27 September 2026

SPY 770.92 BRENT 103.82 BTC 83818 ETH 2682 GRAM 1.43 USDRUB 84.34 CNYRUB 12.54 SpaceX 148.46 25/09/2026 #неинвестсовет

24 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC905 viewsread 27 September 2026

SPY 766.41 BRENT 107.08 BTC 84281 ETH 2679 GRAM 1.44 USDRUB 84.91 CNYRUB 12.65 SpaceX 147.85 24/09/2026 #неинвестсовет

23 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 27 September 2026

SPY 773.38 BRENT 98.92 BTC 86462 ETH 2763 GRAM 1.47 USDRUB 84.07 CNYRUB 12.53 SpaceX 154.72 23/09/2026 #неинвестсовет

22 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,400 views0 reactions4 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Похоже, у инвесторов в крипту (тех, которые HODL) после года в просадках и убытках снова появляется надежда на возобновление аптренда. Еще в августе три основные монеты (на графике они представлены через торгуемые на бирже ETF) вернулись над свои 200-дневные средние. Затем месяц консолидации, ре-тест (успешный) 200-дневки сверху и вот новая попытка обновить локальные максимумы. Теперь к этому добавляется и оживление…

21 Sept 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 27 September 2026

SPY 761.69 BRENT 101.93 BTC 85000 ETH 2750 GRAM 1.43 USDRUB 84.20 CNYRUB 12.57 SpaceX 152.71 21/09/2026 #неинвестсовет

19 Sept 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,660 views0 reactions2 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

18 Sept 2026, 12:49 UTC≈1,890 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Помню, как выступал в 2025(4?) на форуме РБК И ТАКАЯ НОВОСТЬ КАЗАЛАСЬ ОКОЛО НЕВОЗМОЖНОЙ> Я же говорил, цитата пару тройку лет и «вы увидите возвращение к разговорам о возобновлении поставок газа в Германию» #неинвестсовет

17 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 27 September 2026

SPY 762.52 BRENT 103.16 BTC 76696 ETH 2470 GRAM 1.35 USDRUB 84.51 CNYRUB 12.58 SpaceX 154.28 17/09/2026 #неинвестсовет

16 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @Pro_BlockchainPhoto

⚖️ Celsius подала иск против BitMEX на сумму $495 миллионов из-за ликвидаций во время краха 2020 года. Компания пытается вернуть 6,360 BTC, потерянных в результате падения рынка во время Covid, что создает сложности с дельта-нейтральным маркетингом кредитора. 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем на Polymarket

13 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC≈1,810 views0 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @adtechfromlagutin

Posted without readable text

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @dtiAlgo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@dtiAlgo edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

MarketTwits
@markettwits · 336,911
#1
GoDBoT
@godbot_pro · 1,488
#2
Pro Blockchain
@Pro_Blockchain · 159,414
#3
Crypto Headlines
@crypto_hd · 132,236
#4
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ
@slezisatoshi · 123,780
#5
MakarovBar
@clarityforstartups · 1,467
#6
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,282
#7
ЗЛОЙ ФИНАНСИСТ 😡
@finpizdec · 54,789
#8
РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ
@AK47pfl · 115,716
#9
bitkogan
@bitkogan · 259,899
#10
Андрюнин.
@andryuninthelegend · 18,729
#11
#допиздержки
@elina_tikhonova · 878
#12
Сигналы РЦБ
@cbrstocks · 117,553
#13
Тимофей Мартынов
@martynovtim · 35,988
#14
Всевидящее Шоко
@vseshoko · 25,846
#15
💰 WALL STREET PRO
@thewallstreetpro · 46,529
#16
𝐌𝐘-𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄’𝐬 𝑏𝑙𝑜𝑔
@My_Trade_Blog · 3,369
#17
ForkLog
@forklog · 92,233
#18
bitkogan⚡️HOTLINE
@bitkogan_hotline · 82,524
#19
Angry Bonds
@angrybonds · 24,215
#20
Манька Аблигация
@marythebond · 44,599
#21
Incrypted
@incrypted · 108,513
#22
Deep Ton
@DeepTon · 19,495
#23
Сам ты инвестор!
@selfinvestor · 127,329
#24
НЕБАФФЕТТ
@thefinansist · 17,499
#25
Coin Post – Деньги, инвестиции, биткоин
@Coin_Post · 291,333
#26
РАНТЬЕ
@rentierru · 6,366
#27
КРИПТОРЕЛАКС
@CRYPTORELAKS · 26,502
#28
The Edinorog 🦄
@Theedinorogblog · 43,821
#29
Сергей Пирогов
@PirogovLive · 27,814
#30
Alenka Capital. Comon.ru
@alenka_capital_comon · 15,136
#31
MOEX Derivatives
@moex_derivatives · 17,472
#32
Akselrod
@investing_video · 6,795
#33
СМАРТЛАБ
@smartlabnews · 76,417
#34
Tony Fich - IT, GameDev, Startups
@TonyFichBlog · 219
#35
Khanov Solo
@khanovsolo · 5,481
#36
Биржа опционов
@option_lab · 4,109
#37
Truevalue
@truevalue · 14,021
#38
Investment kingyru 💎
@investkingyru · 1,708,904
#39
Crypto Falcon
@falconinvestors · 82,295
#40
Perforum macro
@Perforum_macro · 2,444
#41
Токсичное мнение
@toxicopinion · 1,903
#42
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io
@slavik_investor · 24,702
#43
Дерипаска
@olegderipaska · 117,392
#44
Илья Петров | Инвестиции и трейдинг
@speculators_notes · 5,254
#45
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 60,633
#46
POLZA > SOYUZniki Club
@the_SOYUZniki · 421
#47
Банкста
@banksta · 438,371
#48
headlines
@headlines_for_traders · 115,317
#49
DEFI Scam Check
@Defiscamcheck · 48,614
#50
Glazunov trade
@glazunovtrade · 265
#51
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 905,528
#52
Verbitsky =live=
@georgvlive · 3,111
#53
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,690
#54
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,526
#55
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 456,385
#56
Gram RUS
@toncoin_rus · 524,626
#57
DeCenter — блокчейн, биткоин, инвестиции
@DeCenter · 1,823,722
#58
PIFAGOR TRADE
@pifagortrade · 85,344
#59
TruEcon
@truecon · 26,540
#60
GENESIS
@trend_gen · 55,169
#61
Flipper's place
@true_flipper · 17,643
#62
Миша Жуховицкий
@juhovitskiy · 41,253
#63
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️
@cryptoattack24 · 56,006
#64
MMI
@russianmacro · 102,636
#65
Капитал
@sgcapital · 19,226
#66
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 129,572
#67
Perforum jobs
@Perforum_jobs · 16,080
#68
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,291
#69
ХОЛОДНЫЙ РАСЧЕТ ∅ 🇷🇺
@c0ldness · 13,690
#70
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,033
#71
FOMOHOMO
@FOMOHOMO · 27,120
#72
Русский венчур
@rusven · 24,781
#73
РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 132,308
#74
Грокс
@groks · 42,867
#75
Волк с Мосбиржи 🐺
@moexwolf · 26,216
#76
LadimirKapital
@LadimirKapital · 12,520
#77
Gennady M
@gen_m · 67,020
#78
Forbes Russia
@forbesrussia · 235,532
#79
Перепрошивка...
@sergeyshendrik · 436
#80
Кабаков Ярослав: Тренды и Трейды
@u_Yaroslava · 3,771
#81
AirdropHunter (CIS)
@airdrop_hunter_public · 347,298
#82
Менделеевщина!
@mendeleevshina · 23,888
#83
Агаев Мурад / Russian Magellan
@russianmagellan · 17,199
#84
Blockchain & DeFi Hardcore
@DeFiHardcore · 9,860
#85
Глеб Костарев | Love, Death & Crypto
@cryptogleb · 6,023
#86
СМАРТЛАБ НОВОСТИ
@newssmartlab · 64,210
#87
СОЛОДИН LIVE
@goodtraders · 45,035
#88
PRO CRYPTO TRADING
@PROBTRADING · 47,706
#89
Не трогайте моих единорогов!
@tatiana_edinorog · 937
#90
PRO облигации
@pro_bonds · 7,324
#91
Виктор Першиков
@viktor_pershikov · 9,388
#92
Кримсон Дайджест
@crimsondigest · 141,439
#93
BitLenta 🌲🪙⚡️ Вечный Восходл Души! サトし なカモと
@BitLenta · 13,083
#94
ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ
@MarketDumki · 51,866
#95

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Всевидящее Шоко
@vseshoko · 25,846
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 September 2026
daGama
@da_ga_ma · 71,902
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov” (@dtiAlgo), 37,289 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dtiAlgo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.