Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО»

@Bondholders

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,553subscribers

+2,279 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391399404
TypeChannel
Username@Bondholders
DescriptionПубликации Ассоциации инвесторов АВО Мы в сети: https://bondholders.taplink.ws/ Чат: @GoodBonds Дисклеймер: https://telegra.ph/ogranichenie-otvetstvennosti-08-26 Заявление о регистрации №4840155285 #KA6KT
Created31 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bondholders

Growth

20,27422,56221,4186 August 2026 — 20,274 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,473 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,540 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,551 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,562 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,560 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,558 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,553 subscribers22,5536 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2,279. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,931–22,905 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:1422,553-5
11 Aug 2026, 18:4722,558-2
10 Aug 2026, 15:1322,560-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:5122,562+11
8 Aug 2026, 12:3122,551+11
7 Aug 2026, 13:2122,540+67
6 Aug 2026, 10:0122,473+2,199
6 Aug 2026, 04:3320,274first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
99.2%
avg views ÷ 22,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,400
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (22 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total111,900
Reactions total1,184
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
369
Videos
30
Links
1,550

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

49,659 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17,87036.0%
🔥15,74431.7%
15,62931.5%
👏4160.838%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,786reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC≈49,500 views564 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дефолт ЕвроТранса: конвейер работает исправно Произошло неизбежное. Ещё летом 2024 года АВО публично поставила под сомнение как реалистичность бизнес-модели ЕвроТранса, так и достоверность отчетности, которую эмитент демонстрировал рынку. 👹👹 Что последовало за той публикацией? Банк-организатор вывел на рынок ещё 10 выпусков и собрал с инвесторов свыше 29 миллиардов рублей. Долг эмитента с явными признаками классичес

👍383🔥107👏4925

27 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC≈10,900 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Перемен требуют ЦФА С 1 октября ЦФА должны будут публиковать не только условия выпусков, но и сведения о своем финансовом положении, обязательствах, структуре бизнеса и прочие данные, необходимые для оценки устойчивости компании. Соответствующие требования ввел Банк России. Предполагается, что новые меры повысят интерес инвесторов к инструменту и будут способствовать росту рынка, хотя в настоящий момент количество н

👍68🔥17👏93

24 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈12,400 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Облигационер 2026: какой он? Что показал опрос частных инвесторов о портфелях, ставке и дефолтах. 👉 Смотреть результаты опроса на сайте АВО @bondholders 🔹

👍577🔥6

17 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTC≈20,200 views381 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡️ 99,9% денег и 0% прав: АВО добивается для инвесторов права привлекать аудиторов к ответу АВО направила в Государственную Думу инициативу: владельцы облигаций должны получить право требовать в суде признания аудиторского заключения заведомо ложным. Сегодня акционер вправе спросить с аудитора. А владелец облигаций того же эмитента такого права лишён. При этом именно облигации - это более 99,9% публичного финансир

👍262🔥68👏3318

14 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈18,900 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Портрет облигационера Опрос Ассоциации инвесторов АВО о состоянии портфелей и настроениях частных инвесторов в облигации. Время заполнения: 5–7 минут. Опрос анонимный. Мы будем благодарны вам за прохождение опроса и если вы поделитесь им с знакомыми. Ссылка на опрос: https://forms.gle/WzSACLtJY6TpK2mu6 @bondholders 🔹

👍5012🔥9👏1

9 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC≈9,820 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Представители Ассоциации приняли участие в состоявшемся в Общественной палате обсуждении актуальных вопросов аудиторской деятельности. Повестка мероприятия включала вопросы востребованности результатов аудита, ответственности должностных лиц за качество отчетности и необходимости изменения Закона "Об аудиторской деятельности". В мероприятии приняли участие представители Государственной Думы, Федерального казначейст

👍66🔥20👏102

5 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC≈8,590 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤖Зачем инвестору ИИ-инструменты: как нейросети экономят время и деньги Новая статья от руководителя направления АВО «Зарубежные рынки» Александры Янковской. 🖥 Читать на сайте АВО @bondholders 🔹

👍22🔥62

4 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC≈18,800 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Эмитенты ЦФА будут раскрывать информацию по новым правилам С 1 октября 2026 г. Банк России вводит расширенные требования к раскрытию сведений для эмитентов ЦФА. В соответствии с документом, опубликованном 18 июня, компании должны будут опубликовать детальную финотчетность, а также данные о содержании своего кредитного портфеля. Как подчеркивает Михаил Локшин, член совета «Ассоциации инвесторов АВО», надо создать ин

👍65👏7🔥52

24 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC≈42,200 views296 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📄Государственная Дума приняла во втором и третьем чтениях изменения в Налоговый кодекс, которые устраняют дискриминацию БПИФ и обращающихся на бирже ЗПИФ в части льготы на долгосрочное владение ценными бумагами. Теперь эта льгота доступна для всех БПИФ и ОПИФ управляемых российскими УК и для ЗПИФ, паи которых обращаются на бирже. ❗️После вступления закона в силу изменения будут работать ретроспективно, с 1 января 2

👍180👏66🔥4010

19 Jun 2026, 07:20 UTC≈24,800 views273 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Этот день мы приближали, как могли В прошлом году Ассоциация инвесторов АВО выявила проблемы системного характера на рынке ЦФА, подготовила свои предложения по их решению и вынесла их на рассмотрение Экспертного совета Банка России. Основной проблемой была существенная информационная асимметрия между ЦФА и ОРЦБ, лишавшая граждан возможности осмысленного инвестирования. Инвесторы в ЦФА фактически находились в информ

👍168🔥57👏3810

18 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC≈44,500 views14,079 reactionsread 12 August 2026

От эмоций и слухов — к правовым стандартам В связи с появлением в СМИ некорректных комментариев и искаженных интерпретаций касательно ситуации с верификацией параметров бизнес-модели эмитента ООО «ВУШ», Ассоциация считает необходимым дать официальные разъяснения. АВО подчеркивает: данный шаг не является жалобой, претензией или выражением недоверия к компании. Это цивилизованный инструмент защиты интересов инвестици

4,730👍4,690🔥4,640👏19

17 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC≈37,200 views271 reactionsread 12 August 2026

АВО добивается устранения налоговой дискриминации БПИФ ⚡️ Ассоциация направила инициативу в профильные комитеты Госдумы, Совета Федерации, в Минфин и Банк России. В чем абсурд текущей ситуации? 🔴С 1 января 2026 года льготу за долгосрочное владение (ЛДВ) вернули для открытых фондов (ОПИФ), но про биржевые (БПИФ) почему-то «забыли»; 🔴ОПИФ и БПИФ — экономически идентичные инструменты, поэтому их разделение в налогообл

👍192👏37🔥348

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Bondholders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 6,653 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО»” (@Bondholders), 22,553 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bondholders.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.