Публикации Ассоциации инвесторов АВО
Мы в сети: https://bondholders.taplink.ws/
Чат: @GoodBonds
Дисклеймер: https://telegra.ph/ogranichenie-otvetstvennosti-08-26
Заявление о регистрации №4840155285
#KA6KT
Created
31 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
44,400 average views per post against 26,123 subscribers — an engagement rate of 170.1%. Across the 13,257 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,016–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.59% and 18.5%, with a median of 9.28%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured
9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
400,000
Mature posts only
170.1% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +5,849. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,012–29,436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:36
26,123
-314
16 Sept 2026, 03:58
26,437
-475
14 Sept 2026, 09:40
26,912
-558
12 Sept 2026, 18:18
27,470
-763
10 Sept 2026, 18:17
28,233
+3,401
7 Sept 2026, 13:58
24,832
-283
4 Sept 2026, 13:16
25,115
-179
2 Sept 2026, 23:33
25,294
+4,956
1 Sept 2026, 21:33
20,338
+123
31 Aug 2026, 22:05
20,215
-134
30 Aug 2026, 22:27
20,349
-59
29 Aug 2026, 22:19
20,408
-48
28 Aug 2026, 23:16
20,456
-41
27 Aug 2026, 22:34
20,497
-29
27 Aug 2026, 01:14
20,526
-5
25 Aug 2026, 23:49
20,531
-36
24 Aug 2026, 23:05
20,567
-54
23 Aug 2026, 09:32
20,621
-108
21 Aug 2026, 20:55
20,729
-51
20 Aug 2026, 18:16
20,780
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
170.1%
avg views ÷ 26,123 subscribers
Avg views / post
44,400
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.631%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
33 (22 May 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
400,000
Reactions total
2,525
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 10:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈369
Videos
≈30
Links
≈1,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
52,703 reactions across 32 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
19,305
36.6%
🔥
16,390
31.1%
❤
16,164
30.7%
👏
844
1.60%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52,830 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Организационный комитет сообщает об утверждении итоговых результатов финального этапа голосования премии "Лучший IR среди эмитентов облигаций".
Впервые АВО и «Эксперт РА» создали на облигационном рынке формат, в котором победителей определяет широкое голосование частных инвесторов. Эмитентов оценивали те, ради кого и существует Investor Relations — сами инвесторы. Те, кто ежедневно рискует собственными деньгами и до…
🏦 Купоны на ИИС-3 — снова в повестке
Банк России опубликовал проект Основных направлений развития финансового рынка на 2027 год и период 2028–2029 годов. В нём — пункт, которого инвесторы ждут с января 2024 года: регулятор оценит возможность распоряжения купонными доходами на ИИС-3 – получения купонов на банковский счёт без потери налоговой льготы.
Именно этого АВО последовательно добивается последние два года.
Поч…
АВО: защита облигационеров не должна превращаться в ограничение их прав
«Коммерсантъ» опубликовал материал «Держателям долгов расписывают права» с мнениями участников рынка на предложения Банка России по реформированию защиты инвесторов в облигации.
Ассоциация инвесторов АВО обозначила принципиальную позицию: усиление коллективной защиты не должно лишать частного инвестора возможности самостоятельно отстаивать сво…
АВО: требования к эмитентам — это не «лишняя нагрузка», а цена публичного рынка
Ассоциация инвесторов АВО разобрала основные возражения эмитентов к проекту нового Положения Банка России о допуске ценных бумаг к организованным торгам.
Вывод достаточно однозначный.
Значительная часть аргументов сводится к тому, что новые требования неудобны, затратны или ограничивают свободу эмитента.
Но публичный рынок существует …
Дефолт наступил по всем выпускам облигаций «ЕвроТранса». Член Правления Ассоциации инвесторов АВО Алексей Пономарев на Радио РБК рассказал, что делать владельцам бумаг компании
Первое, что нужно сделать владельцу облигации при дефолте, — быть честным с самим собой и признать, что риск-менеджмент не сработал, подчеркнул член правления ассоциации инвесторов АВО Алексей Пономарев на Радио РБК. «Дефолт, он ведь почти ни…
Дефолтники: кто получит второй шанс?
Едва отгремела история с «ЕвроТрансом», как в отрасли появился новый кандидат на выбывание — нефтесервисная компания «Оил Ресурс», специализирующаяся на оптовой торговле топливом. Показательно, что Ассоциация направила в ЦБ открытое письмо с жалобой на действия ООО «Пром-Инвест-Аудит», выполнявшей аудит отчетности «Оил Ресурса» — аудит, который, как считают в АВО, «перешел в плос…
📢 Создан Благотворительный фонд «Гуманитарные инвестиции»
Неравнодушные инвесторы и многолетние меценаты — участники и сторонники Ассоциации — выступили с инициативой создания благотворительного фонда, и Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО» с готовностью поддержала эту идею.
Так появился фонд «Гуманитарные инвестиции» — организация, созданная специально для сбора и целевого распределения средств на реализацию гуманитарных и…
Вышел новый материал в Cbonds Review — «Дефолты приходят толпой»
Почему высокая доходность облигации далеко не всегда означает хорошую инвестиционную возможность?
В новом выпуске Cbonds Review Мурад Агаев разбирает одну из самых опасных ошибок инвестора в ВДО — попытку просто вычесть историческую частоту дефолтов из доходности и получить таким образом «чистую премию за риск».
Проблема в том, что дефолты не распре…
45 МИЛЛИАРДОВ РУБЛЕЙ - В ДЫМ.
Бумажные миллиарды подтверждает аудитор. Реальные убытки оплачивает инвестор.
С начала 2026 года инвесторы потеряли на дефолтах гигантскую сумму — более 45 млрд рублей. Самое страшное: отчетность почти каждого из этих эмитентов была «чистой», с идеальными заключениями аудиторов!
АВО направила официальное обращение Председателю Банка России Эльвире Набиуллиной с призывом остановить сист…
Всё новое — хорошо забытое старое
В Ассоциацию продолжают поступать обращения владельцев облигаций ПАО «ЕвроТранс»: по ряду выпусков держатели не могут подать требование о досрочном погашении, так как отсутствует референс корпоративного действия на его подачу.
Ассоциация напоминает: ситуация не новая, и решение у неё уже есть.
Мы уже писали о том, что в случаях, когда эмитент уклоняется от направления в центральны…
«ЕвроТранс»: эвакуатор не приедет
Летом 2024 года Ассоциация владельцев облигаций (АВО) публично поставила под сомнение реалистичность бизнес-модели компании и достоверность отчетности, показываемой рынку. АВО опубликовала аналитический обзор «Космические показатели ПАО “ЕвроТранс”», в котором перечислила все странности. «За период 2022–2023 годов выручка “ЕвроТранса” существенно выросла — в 2,6 раза к уровню 2021 …
О роли института представителей владельцев облигаций (ПВО) в защите прав облигационеров, об ответственности организаций, участвующих в размещении ценных бумаг, о необходимости изменения подхода розничных инвесторов к деятельности на фондовом рынке рассказал в интервью “Ъ” член правления Ассоциации инвесторов АВО Илья Винокуров.
ЦБ удалось перезапустить механизм ПВО (представители владельцев облигаций.— “Ъ”), удалив …
👍106🔥17❤14👏9
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Bondholders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Bondholders edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 September 2026
Most recent edit
23 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Манька Аблигация @marythebond · 44,599 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Cbonds @cbonds · 34,855 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Angry Bonds @angrybonds · 24,215 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Market Power @marketpowercomics · 31,650 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
Вредный Инвестор @harmfulinvestor · 30,846 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
IF Bonds — Облигации РФ @if_bonds · 94,926 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
БКС Мир инвестиций @bcs_world_of_investments · 36,595 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
ИнвестократЪ | Георгий Аведиков @investokrat · 31,915 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
Биржевик | Облигации @birzhevikbondsofficial1 · 22,047 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
ВТБ Мои Инвестиции @brokervtb · 111,296 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
PRObonds | Иволга Капитал @probonds · 30,304 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 7 September 2026
Дивиденды Forever @divForever · 76,993 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Записки юной пенсионерки @kiltauolgafinance · 54,128 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Газпромбанк Инвестиции @gpb_investments · 45,343 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Инвестируй или проиграешь | Юрий Козлов @invest_or_lost · 27,253 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
MOEX - Московская биржа @MoscowExchangeOfficial · 54,805 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
Zakharov Invest @zakharov_risk · 25,613 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
P.S investing @malishok_fonda · 26,290 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Финуслуги @MoexFinuslugi · 48,310 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Тимофей Мартынов @martynovtim · 35,988 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Mozgovik Research | Анализ акций @mozgovikresearch · 23,286 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции @tuzov_invest · 27,614 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Alfa Wealth @alfawealth · 55,889 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Олег Кузьмичев @kuzmlab · 23,332 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО»” (@Bondholders), 26,123 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bondholders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
