Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حسّ سليم

Channel

حسّ سليم

@HS_SLM

On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,924subscribers

+63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262270534
TypeChannel
Username@HS_SLM
Descriptionpage: facebook.com/Bon.sens.S
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/HS_SLM

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,8559,9249,889.56 August 2026 — 9,861 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,855 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,859 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,861 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,866 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,879 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,880 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,882 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,891 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,881 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,880 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,886 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,896 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,885 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,874 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,882 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,883 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,885 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,886 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,892 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,897 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,898 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,920 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,924 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net +63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,845–9,934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 00:099,924+4
4 Nov 2026, 12:479,920+22
1 Nov 2026, 22:089,898+1
30 Oct 2026, 01:489,897+5
26 Oct 2026, 15:369,892+6
23 Oct 2026, 11:519,886+1
20 Oct 2026, 16:049,885+2
18 Oct 2026, 01:579,883+1
15 Oct 2026, 05:329,882+8
12 Oct 2026, 00:189,874-11
5 Oct 2026, 09:209,885-11
27 Sept 2026, 00:179,896+10
17 Sept 2026, 10:599,886+6
13 Sept 2026, 12:229,880-1
9 Sept 2026, 19:159,881-10
4 Sept 2026, 17:179,891+9
31 Aug 2026, 17:259,882+2
28 Aug 2026, 13:279,880+1
25 Aug 2026, 23:349,879+7
23 Aug 2026, 06:479,872first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 9,924 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held40 (3 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total35,510
Reactions total811
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 22:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
785
Videos
82
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17m 28s
Average length
5m 49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,732 reactions across 40 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,16467.2%
👍36921.3%
💯935.37%
👎291.67%
🤯221.27%
❤‍🔥130.751%
👏130.751%
🔥130.751%
👌120.693%
💔20.115%
😍20.115%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (26.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC≈1,090 views59 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

في برنامج على قناة فرنسية، سألت المذيعة سؤالًا جانبيًا لضيفها، العميل السابق لدى المخابرات الفرنسية: كيف نُجنّد العملاء الأجانب؟ فردّ عليها الضيف بأن المخابرات الأمريكية تستعمل المال بشكل حصري تقريبًا لتجنيد العملاء، أما المخابرات الفرنسية فتفضّل استعمال الدوافع العاطفية والأيديولوجية. الذي يجعلنا هنا نتوقف لنتساءل هو: ما هذه الأيديولوجيات التي تمثّلها فرنسا ليكون بمقدورها استعمالها كأدوات لتجنيد العملاء، مثلما كان …

❤44👍11🤯4

6 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,250 views59 reactionsread 10 November 2026

بشكل عام، اهتمام البشر بمصالحهم وبقائهم كأفراد ومجموعات مقدَّم على اتساقهم النظري مع أيديولوجياتهم ومعتقداتهم، فلا سبب يدعو إلى التعجب من وقوف العرب المسلمين في الغرب مع اليسار، رغم كل تلك القيم العائلية المنافية لمعتقداتهم (على كل حال، حتى اليمين لم يعد مختلفًا كثيرًا في ذلك) لاعتقادهم أن اليسار لا يهدد مصالحهم وبقاءهم كمجموعة كما يفعل اليمين. في المقابل، نجد أن حلف الأقليات وطائفة اللائكيين في الشرق، الذين يلعب حل…

👍43❤‍🔥9❤6💔1

2 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,330 views56 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

عادةً، لا أفضّل نقل كلام شخص بعينه حتى لا يتحول ذلك إلى أمر شخصي، لكن المثال هنا واضح، ويعطينا فكرة عن طريقة تفكير بعض الإسلاميين. فهذا الشخص لا ينفي الانتماء الوطني فحسب، بل ينفي وجود الشعوب من الأساس، والحجة المعتادة هي الاستعمار، وكأن الاستعمار هو من اخترع فكرة الشعوب، في تعارض صريح مع نص الآية: ﴿إِنَّا خَلَقْنَاكُمْ شُعُوبًا وَقَبَائِلَ﴾. هذا النوع من الإسلاميين، وغيرهم، يتبنى دائماً حلولاً راديكالية، ويخوض حروب…

❤39👍12👎4🤯1

2 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC≈2,210 views55 reactionsread 10 November 2026

هوية الإنسان بطبيعتها مركّبة، وليست انتماءً واحداً بسيطاً أو معزولاً، بل هي مجموعة من الطبقات المتراكمة والمتداخلة التي تشكّل في مجموعها هوية الفرد. فمن هويته أنه ينتمي إلى عائلة بعينها تميّزه عن سائر العائلات، وإلى حي دون غيره، وإلى مدينة، أو أصحاب مهنة، أو قبيلة، أو شعب، أو قومية، أو أمة. هذه كلها انتماءات متزامنة لا يلغي بعضها بعضاً، بل تتكامل لتشكّل هوية واحدة، مثلما تتكامل أعضاء الجسد وأطرافه لتشكّل كياناً واحدا…

❤46👍8👎1

2 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,550 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤5

1 Nov 2026, 20:45 UTC≈1,750 views24 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯17❤2🔥2🤯2👏1

1 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC≈2,960 views67 reactionsread 10 November 2026

ومن أجل تحقيق هذا الفصل بين الوطن وأهله، تنتهج الوطنية الاستعمارية جملة من الأساليب: الفصل بين الوطن وتاريخه الحي: تدرك الوطنية الاستعمارية جيدًا أنها بلا أصالة تاريخية، وأنها ليست سوى انعكاس للأيديولوجيات الحديثة ولا تحمل في جعبتها سواها. ولتجاوز هذه المعضلة، لا يبقى أمامها سوى الغوص أبعد في التاريخ وادعاء تبنّي حضارات منقرضة والولاء لأجداد اندثروا ولم يبقَ منهم سوى الحمض النووي (DNA) وبعض الصخور والعادات والكلمات …

❤41💯15👍6👏3👌2

1 Nov 2026, 17:43 UTC≈2,730 views81 reactionsread 10 November 2026

كاتب ياسين، كاتب جزائري فرنكوفوني معروف في الفضاء الثقافي الفرنكوفوني، عايش الاستعمار الفرنسي. سُئل مرة عن الكاتب الفرنسي الشهير ألبير كامو، الذي وُلد ونشأ في الجزائر، وهو أمر يفخر به البعض. فقال إن كامو كان عاشقًا للجزائر، وإن أعماله الروائية مليئة بالمناظر الجميلة لهذا البلد، لكنك لا تجد فيها الجزائريين. فالشعب الذي يسكن هذه الأرض لا أثر له في أعماله؛ لا تجد فيها سوى الأوروبيين وأرضٍ اسمها الجزائر. لم يكن كاتب ياس…

❤61👍14❤‍🔥3🔥3

1 Nov 2026, 17:43 UTC≈1,570 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤5

24 Oct 2026, 20:48 UTC≈2,780 views79 reactionsread 10 November 2026

ثانيًا: خصومة الليبرالي مع الدولة، أما خصومة اللائكي فمع المجتمع. نظريًا، تنطلق الليبرالية، في أحد أهم تقاليدها، من الشك في السلطة، ومن ضرورة تقييد قدرتها على التدخل في حياة الأفراد. فالدولة، في هذا التصور، ليست مؤسسةً مكلّفة بصناعة الإنسان المثالي أو بإعادة تشكيل المجتمع وفق نموذج محدد، بل سلطة ينبغي تقييدها وضبطها حتى لا تتحول من ضامن للحريات الفردية إلى وصيّ على اختيارات الناس. في المقابل، تنطلق اللائكية من تقال…

❤53👍21👎4🔥1

24 Oct 2026, 20:48 UTC≈2,390 views67 reactionsread 10 November 2026

بعد أن حددنا الفروق الجوهرية بين التنوير الفرنسي والتنوير الأنجلوسكسوني، بقي أن نحدد إلى أيهما ينتمي عموم من يحملون لواء التنوير من العرب، ومن يدور في فلكهم من أمازيغ وأكراد وأتراك وإيرانيين وغيرهم. فهذه الخطوة ليست مجرد تمرين في تصنيف التيارات الفكرية، بل هي مفتاح لفهم سلوك هذه النخب وسيكولوجيتها، وطبيعة علاقتها بالدين والمجتمع والسلطة. من الناحية التاريخية، مرة أخرى، تعرّفت المنطقة العربية وأجزاء واسعة من محيطها ا…

❤48👍17👎2

24 Oct 2026, 20:48 UTC≈1,940 views9 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤7👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @HS_SLM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@HS_SLM edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الموسوعة القرآنية
@QuranPediaApp · 29,529
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Muhammad Sameh
@Saicohat · 24,532
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 September 2026
شوبنهاور - سيوران
@Schopenhauer_Cioran · 24,154
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
فريدريك نيتشه
@Nietzsche1 · 36,150
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
لامرئيات الفن السابع 📽
@cinemaartegy · 133,366
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
Dr Hossam Mokhtar - د. حسام مختار
@drhosammokhtar · 26,903
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
الفيلسوف الجديد
@newphilosopher · 27,754
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Aqua web | أكوا ويب
@aqweeb · 22,379
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 20 September 2026
مكتبة ميزوبوتاميا Mesopotamia Library
@ahn1972 · 58,826
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
مكتبة المرأة المسلمة
@maktabatelmoslima · 37,212
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
مركز الخطابي للدراسات
@alkhattabirw · 44,510
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
أحمد مولانا
@AhmedMawlana · 43,588
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
إقرأ/إسمع💜
@ktab7 · 60,854
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
📚المكتبة الطبية في عالم الطب 📚
@BooksMed · 28,083
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 September 2026
اقرألي - كتب صوتية - كتب مسموعة
@iqraaly_books · 97,897
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
T
@tea_sugar · 21,865
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
عالم الكتاب
@ahn2323 · 61,047
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
السبيل
@al_sabeel · 23,932
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
BnSamy
@BnSamyPosts · 62,313
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
تكليف و نيابات
@brufennyabat · 25,028
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 September 2026
E-Book Library
@EBook_Library · 28,770
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Dr Mostafa Saad Ibrahim
@mostvision · 28,663
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
شؤون إسلامية - Islamic Affairs
@ArabAffairsTV · 60,304
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
مكتبة عمر عكاشة
@omerokasha · 23,094
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حسّ سليم” (@HS_SLM), 9,924 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HS_SLM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.