National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 34 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 165 of the 168 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 371 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 34 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Sy_Defense. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 34 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
66 measurements spanning 99 days, net -2,775. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,987–22,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 12:59
19,403
-27
10 Nov 2026, 09:29
19,430
-22
8 Nov 2026, 17:57
19,452
-36
7 Nov 2026, 13:11
19,488
-15
6 Nov 2026, 10:47
19,503
-17
5 Nov 2026, 07:30
19,520
-9
4 Nov 2026, 04:10
19,529
-22
3 Nov 2026, 04:41
19,551
-1
2 Nov 2026, 04:29
19,552
-17
1 Nov 2026, 02:49
19,569
-17
31 Oct 2026, 01:21
19,586
-29
30 Oct 2026, 03:08
19,615
-27
28 Oct 2026, 23:56
19,642
-5
27 Oct 2026, 21:40
19,647
-10
27 Oct 2026, 00:46
19,657
-7
26 Oct 2026, 03:26
19,664
-4
25 Oct 2026, 03:57
19,668
-11
24 Oct 2026, 04:29
19,679
-19
23 Oct 2026, 03:35
19,698
-27
22 Oct 2026, 00:49
19,725
first reading
Engagement
494 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.98%
avg views ÷ 19,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
138 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.285%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
138
of 494 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 137 of 138 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
494 (4 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
186,791
Reactions total
529
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 04:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,300
Videos
≈2,310
Links
≈2,620
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 17s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,133 reactions across 471 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,496
70.1%
👍
305
14.3%
😢
85
3.98%
🎉
44
2.06%
🔥
30
1.41%
🤔
29
1.36%
👏
25
1.17%
🤩
23
1.08%
🤯
21
0.985%
🫡
20
0.938%
❤🔥
14
0.656%
😱
12
0.563%
😐
11
0.516%
👀
7
0.328%
💔
3
0.141%
😎
3
0.141%
😍
2
0.094%
🆒
1
0.047%
😘
1
0.047%
🤗
1
0.047%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 486 of the 494 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,287 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 494 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 138 posts held from the last 30 days (2.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
رويترز عن إدارة الطيران الفيدرالية الأمريكية:
إيقاف جميع الرحلات في كل البلاد لظروف استثنائية ودواع أمنية تتعلق بالسلامة.
وزير النقل الأمريكي: فنيو إدارة الطيران الفيدرالية يحققون في مشكلة الاتصالات وسنقدم تحديثات فورية بمجرد توفرها
وزير النقل الأمريكي: مشكلة الاتصالات أثرت على جميع مراكز مراقبة الحركة الجوية على المسارات الجوية في البلاد
سي إن إن عن مسؤولين بأجهزة إنفاذ القانون: تقارير أولية تشير إلى أن العطل ال…
وزير الخارجية والمغتربين أسعد الشيباني يعقد اجتماعاً مع وزير خارجية دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة الشيخ عبد الله بن زايد آل نهيان خلال منتدى صير بني ياس في العاصمة أبو ظبي
📌جرى خلال الاجتماع بحث مسارات التعاون الثنائي وسبل الارتقاء بها في مختلف المجالات إضافة إلى مناقشة فرص تعزيز الشراكة الاقتصادية والتنموية وتبادل الرؤى حول جهود دعم مساعي الاستقرار في المنطقة
﴿إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا﴾
- الصلاة على النبي ﷺ يوم الجمعة أفضل من بقيّة الأيام، وليلتها أفضل الليالي، قال ﷺ :
("إن من أفضل أيامكم يوم الجمعة فأكثروا عليَّ من الصلاة فيه")
💠 من سنن #يوم_الجمعة
➊ الغسل
➋ الطيب
➌ السواك
➍ لبس الجميل
➎ قراءة سورة الكهف
➏ التبكير لصلاة الجمعة
➐ الإكثار من الصلاة على النبي محمد ﷺ
…
ضبط محاولة تهريب طيور جارحة في منفذ جوسية الحدودي
تمكنت أمانة الجمارك في منفذ جوسية الحدودي من ضبط محاولة تهريب طيور جارحة، وذلك خلال إجراءات التفتيش والكشف على إحدى المركبات العابرة للمنفذ باتجاه الأراضي اللبنانية.
وأثناء عملية الكشف، عثرت الكوادر الجمركية على طيور مخبأة داخل المركبة، ليتم ضبطها ومصادرتها أصولاً، وتنظيم محضر ضبط بالواقعة، تمهيداً لإحالتها إلى الجهات المختصة واستكمال الإجراءات القانونية اللازمة.
و…
تعلن محافظة حمص عن إغلاق تقاطع الجامعة يومي الجمعة والسبت، 13 و14 تشرين الثاني، لتنفيذ أعمال التزفيت.
ندعو السائقين إلى استخدام الطرق البديلة والتقيّد بالإرشادات المرورية خلال فترة الإغلاق، شاكرين تعاونكم.
#محافظة_حمص
#حمص
انفجار صهريجين نفط على أوتوستراد حمص–طرطوس عند نزول الهيثيمية. يُرجى من السائقين المتجهين إلى طرطوس الانتباه والقيادة بحذر
#ريف_حمص_الغربي
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 494 posts we hold for @syrianevent1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مرصد سوريا @sentry_syria_observatory · 21,924 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 19 September 2026
الدفاع المدني السوري @SyriaDefence · 37,856 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
الإعلام العسكري - نيوز @alaskari_news · 40,376 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
دروب الثبات @DrobThabat · 19,374 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 September 2026
الإعلام العسكري - سوريا @alaskari_mediaa · 42,888 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
شبكة أخبار سوريا الحرة @ALMHARAR · 329,992 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
طاهر العمر @zaboomaralsori · 71,710 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
المرصد السوري 🇸🇾 @idlib_marsad · 92,753 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026
اخبار إدارة العمليات العسكرية @Morasl_News · 29,802 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 5 September 2026
سوريا لحظة بلحظة @Almohrar · 34,609 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
محافظة إدلب @IdlibGov1 · 30,029 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
مزمجر الثورة السورية @mzmgr_syria · 83,746 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
قوى الأمن الداخلي @ISFMOISY · 64,704 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
زينو ياسر محاميد @zainaldinmaham1 · 458,111 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
أس الصراع في الشام @asseraaalsham1 · 45,636 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
راديو محافظة ادلب "رحمو" @rahmoo23 · 20,903 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 September 2026
الشيخ عبد الرزاق المهدي @Abedrazzakmahddii · 34,410 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
زينو محاميد @zainaldinmh · 56,533 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
الإعلامي محمد جمال️️ ˢʸʳⁱᵃ @ammamai · 84,821 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
شبكة اعزاز نيوز ( SYRlA ) @khalil124kh · 202,869 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
شبكة شام الإخبارية @ShaamNetwork · 20,015 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 September 2026
قناة اعزاز نيوز @Azaz_News1 · 47,227 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
درعا 24 @daraa24_org · 30,767 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
داماس بوست @Damaspost2 · 26,708 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أبو أمين 80” (@syrianevent1), 19,403 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syrianevent1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.