Channel
@asseraaalsham1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,648subscribers
+162 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001125348779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asseraaalsham1 |
| Description | فأما الزبد فيذهب جفاءً وأما ما ينفع الناس فيمكث في الأرض |
| Created | 9 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asseraaalsham1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 42,648 | +25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 42,623 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 42,641 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 42,665 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 42,672 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 42,666 | +50 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 42,616 | +130 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 42,486 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (1 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 671,490 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#القتل_باسم_التحرير - أكبر كذبة صدّقها الشعب السوري وضحكوا عليه بها هي أنّه إن ذهبت هذه السلطة سيعود للحكم للأقليات. - يا ناس قرار إسقاط النظام السوري وإنهاء حكم الأقليات اتخذ بعد عملية طوفان الأقصى بسبعة أشهر ومن اتخذه لو يريد إعادة حكم الأقليات لما أسقط النظام بالأصل . - غداً ستكتشفون سرّ من أسرار معركة تحرير سوريا مثل عملية تقنية هائلة تم من خلالها إرسال رسائل لكل الوحدات القتالية لجيش النظام بالانسحاب من م…
Photo, posted without a caption
#مظهر_الويس_يكفر_نفسه قال باتريك هاييني الفرنسي السويسري البريطاني في جلسة في دمشق أمام قيادات من الثورة والجيش الحر ، إنّ مظهر الويس وأنس خطاب هذا هو فكرهم منذ بداية الثورة لكنهم خدعوكم وأظهروا أنهم جهاديون متطرفون ونحن الغرب مرتاحون منهم و نثق بهم . - باتريك هذا مع دارين خليفة و روبرت فورد هم جزء من منظومة جوناثان باول لتعويم الجولاني و كان الغطاء الظاهري فريق مجموعة الأزمات الدولية. - بدؤوا مشروعهم بدراسة ع…
Photo, posted without a caption
#آب_لهّاب - قُدّم عرض للشرع بضم مناطق من لبنان من اليقاع حتى طرابلس لسوريا مقابل إخراج القنيطرة ودرعا والسويداء تحصيل حاصل من حدود سوريا. -نهاية شهر آب ستندلع شرارة الحرب ( حسب الخطط الموضوعة) ولا يهم سبب الحرب سواء دخول الشرع إلى لبنان أو دخول الحزب والفلول إلى سوريا ، أو دخول الحشد إلى دير الزور أو حدث داخلي معين ، هذه كلها أسباب لاندلاع شرارة الحرب - مجرد اندلعت شرارة الحرب كرة الثلج. ستتدحرج في سوريا ولبنا…
Video, posted without a caption
#المقابلة_المصطنعة - هذا مقال الصحافي حسام جزماتي الذي شبه تخصص بتفاصيل عن الجولاني معظم ما ورد فيه صحيح مع بعض التصحيحات والتعليقات: ١- ما ذكره لي الجولاني من تواريخ ذهابه الثاني للعراق ( أواخر عام ٢٠٠٤) واعتقاله في ١٤/٥/٢٠٠٥ هذه نفس التواريخ التي ذكرها الكاتب. ٢- لكن بعد التحري الدقيق وجدت انه ذهب للعراق الذهاب الثاني في الشهر الخامس من عام ٢٠٠٥ وتم اعتقاله في الشهر ١١ من نفس العام. - الشيخ الدمشقي الذي علم…
Photo, posted without a caption
الشيباني من سكرتيرته سوزي البريطانية إلى توظيفه لمثل هذه العاهات في وزارته كم شبيح وشبيحة للنظام مازالوا في وزارة الخارجية ؟
مثال بسيط ومن دكتور مؤيد للسلطة بقوة عن وهم الاستثمارات التي حقيقتها غسيل أموال انظروا عقد بقيمة ٧ مليار $ لشركة تبين أنها تأسست عام ٢٠٢٤ يعني سنة التحرير ومعلوم تستطيع تأسيس شركة بتاريخ مسبق لعدة أشهر في أكثر من دولة كذلك الشركة هي تعمل بالتسويق العقارب فكيف صارت خبيرة ثروة حيوانية الحقيقة هي هناك ٥٤ شركة كلها واجهات مدنية وتأسست في عام ٢٠٢٤ و عام ٢٠٢٥ لكنها في الحقيقة هي كلها ملك لهيئة تحرير الشام ومهمة الصندو…
الأمر ليس بدعم داعش و لا النظام السابق كل شركة ناجحة يريد الشرع وضع يده عليها عبر الصندوق السيادي والتهم جاهزة فلول داعش إرهاب على الأقل في زمن النظام كان هناك حد أدنى من الهيكلية والمعايير لا يستطيع النظام النزول عنها بينما اليوم بحجة حررناكم يستبيح نظام الشرع كل شيء بلا رقيب ولا حسيب.
#معادلة_ثلاثية هناك معادلة قادمة في سوريا هي : الشرع - الشيباني - مناف طلاس ذهاب - قدوم - انتقال لنرى عضلات الجهابذة في حل المعادلة هذه
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @asseraaalsham1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 194,196 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أس الصراع في الشام” (@asseraaalsham1), 42,648 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asseraaalsham1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.