Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SHOIFOT Стартап Котики

@shoifot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,223subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001293425862
TypeChannel
Username@shoifot
Created7 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shoifot

Growth

4,2234,2244,223.57 August 2026 — 4,224 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,223 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,224 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,223 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,223–4,224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:064,223-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:574,224+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:504,223-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:464,224first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 4,223 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 February 202630 July 2026)
Views total4,060
Reactions total106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

566 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23441.3%
🔥16629.3%
👍8915.7%
🦄498.66%
😁162.83%
👀122.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 566reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC610 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Jason Calacanis, "Angel: How to Invest in Technology Startups". Главные темы: 1. Ставьте на основателей, а не на идеи Почти каждая успешная компания радикально меняет первоначальную идею. Гораздо важнее способность основателя быстро учиться, продавать, нанимать и преодолевать трудности. 2. Angel investing: это игра степенного закона (Power Law) Один Uber может окупить десятки или сотни неудачных инвестиций. 90% ст

14👍9🔥7🦄3👀1😁1

21 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,240 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$1,700,000,000,000 ($1,7 триллиона) — столько в 2025 году вложили венчурные инвесторы и private equity в технологические стартапы (больше вкладывали во второй половине года). Почему? Потому, что инвестиции в быстрорастущие непубличные технологические стартапы бьют инвестиции даже в NASDAQ — особенно в 2026 году... Будет ли это так всегда? Никто не знает. Но на длинной дистанции, выглядит так, что венчурные инвестиции

10🦄3👀1😁1

20 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,080 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

(не)Большой Секрет для маленьких Котиков: 90% стартапов проваливаются (информация — от самого большого в мире проекта анализа стартапов https://startupgenome.com/) — обсудим позже почему это происходит, но 3 вывода отсюда важны: 1. Основателям: не бойтесь fail fast, главное — постоянный РОСТ (знаний, продаж и — как ни странно — рынка! за рынком надо следить всегда, бежать туда, где он есть, но более всего — где он БУ

🔥2415🦄4

17 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC≈1,130 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

FAIL FAST! 40% enterprise AI проектов к будущему году будут отменены, считает Gartner... в принципе, ничего страшного, нормальный поиск решений — но — сигнал нам всем задумываться заранее про то, что сама ПРИРОДА СТАРТАПА и технологий суммируется этой отважной философской фразочкой: Fail fast.... (и отряхнись, и беги опять!) https://tasmiasharmin7.medium.com/from-agi-to-ai-agents-why-did-the-biggest-ai-companies-qui

8🦄3🔥2

12 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,360 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Котики, в жизни стартапа и инвестора бывает «всякое» (помните Закон Мёрфи? «if shit can happen, it happens; if it can’t happen, it still happens») и не забывайте главное житейское правило Карлсона, Который Живет На Крыше: Пустяки, дело житейское! https://t.me/shoifot 🦄🐳🐅

12🔥5👍4👀2🦄2😁2

10 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,340 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

NASDAQ подсчитал динамику доходности акций на нем по отраслям на частных рынках за первое полугодие 2026 года. Потребительский сектор (!) показал наибольший рост — +53%. Искусственный интеллект, "возглавляемый" Anthropic (+164%), занял второе (!) место с ростом на +44%, за ним следует здравоохранение (Neuralink +188%) с ростом на +41%. Промышленный сектор, включающий космическую отрасль (SpaceX +56%) и оборонную пром

12🦄5👀4

9 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,240 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

(можно похвастаться?) 🦄 Backblaze -- еще один unicorn в портфеле TMT (первый раз мы входили по $26M), 9 лет представлял родной ТМТ наблюдая за ростом Backblaze на совете директоров, это был поучительный опыт... компания стала юникорном, и надеюсь, что "лучшее конечно впереди" https://t.me/shoifot 🦄🐳🐅

22🔥20👍7🦄5

5 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC≈1,610 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В Silicon Valley говорят "ЕСЛИ ТЫ НЕ ЗА СТОЛОМ, ТО ТЫ В МЕНЮ".... помните, котики, восторги по Фигме с 90х (!) оценкой к продажам? Компания, по любым меркам, просто супер 1. лидер сегмента, бьет конкурентов 2. история стабильного очень быстрого роста 3. 2 последних квартала быстро падает burn и отличный шанс break-even в этом/следующем квартале 4. огромный запас денег 5. огромный бренд, чуть ли не "всем известный" 6.

19🔥13👍7👀3🦄1

23 Jun 2026, 20:44 UTC≈2,290 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

❤️ Vertical AI — новая любовь Silicon Valley ❤️ Хайп хайпом, а в течение последних примерно трех лет индустрия AI (ИИшники, любовно зовем мы их!) в основном сосредоточилась на совершенствовании возможностей моделей. Каждое новое поколение демонстрировало более высокую производительность в программировании, автоматизации рабочих процессов и решении все более сложных задач. И все же, котики, несмотря на эти маленькие м

🔥18👍98

6 Jun 2026, 18:15 UTC≈2,330 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

в Сан-Франциско все обсуждают постик Anthropic о том, что AI фантастически быстро само-улучшается, продуктивность растет космически, и - НЕ ПОРА ЛИ нам всем остановиться? :) Пост встречен дикими потоками ядовитого сарказма одних (ну да, вы уже делаете IPO, теперь можем остановиться, ага), возгласами: "а я же говорил!" других и "- Ну, что ты стоишь, Глеб? Надо что-то делать! Ведь они убьют его!!" - но огромное спасибо

19👍9🔥7😁4🦄3

15 Apr 2026, 05:54 UTC≈3,030 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

YC, подвинься, Андриссен пришел 😎 🤷🏻‍♂️провел сегодня пол дня с потрясающими стартапами Андриссен-Хоровиц, уровень настолько выше любимых стартапов любимого YC, что просто слов нет, рост, рост, и ещё раз рост, забудьте все свои стратегические измышлизмы - money talks, буллшит walks 🦄 just look at these bad asses🦸‍♂️ https://t.me/shoifot 🦄🐳🐅

🔥3611🦄5👍2👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shoifot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 911,546 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SHOIFOT Стартап Котики” (@shoifot), 4,223 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shoifot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.