Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SaaS по Понятиям

Channel

SaaS по Понятиям

@saasstuff

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,737subscribers

+795 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001870404415
TypeChannel
Username@saasstuff
DescriptionКанал SaaS фаундера и автора Венчура по Понятиям (@ventureStuff) про SaaS бизнесы, GTM и как зарабатывать деньги в SaaS. Гайд по Go-to-market для фаундеров: https://almas.vc/gtm
Created13 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/saasstuff

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,9429,7379,339.56 August 2026 — 8,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,946 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,954 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,959 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,961 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,954 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,958 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,985 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,989 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,017 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,009 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,003 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,079 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,094 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,206 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,250 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,353 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,441 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,510 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,585 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,637 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,653 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,723 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,737 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +795. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,823–9,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 20:209,737+14
5 Nov 2026, 23:149,723+70
2 Nov 2026, 17:569,653+16
30 Oct 2026, 18:119,637+52
27 Oct 2026, 07:519,585+75
24 Oct 2026, 03:199,510+69
20 Oct 2026, 22:569,441+88
18 Oct 2026, 02:279,353+103
14 Oct 2026, 17:319,250+44
11 Oct 2026, 14:019,206+112
5 Oct 2026, 09:199,094+15
27 Sept 2026, 09:569,079+76
18 Sept 2026, 12:159,003-6
14 Sept 2026, 12:379,009-8
10 Sept 2026, 13:379,017+28
1 Sept 2026, 03:278,989+4
28 Aug 2026, 21:068,985+27
23 Aug 2026, 05:358,958+4
19 Aug 2026, 08:038,954-7
16 Aug 2026, 08:038,961first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 9,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,050
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.858%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held55 (20 May 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total72,850
Reactions total625
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
156
Videos
22
Links
137

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12m 10s
Average length
2m 02s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,125 reactions across 52 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤53725.3%
😁46922.1%
👍46321.8%
🔥33415.7%
💯1044.89%
🤣371.74%
❤‍🔥321.51%
👏321.51%
😐130.612%
😱120.565%
🙈100.471%
🤬100.471%
😢90.424%
🫡90.424%
👀70.329%
👌60.282%
🤯60.282%
🥴60.282%
🤔50.235%
🤩30.141%
13 further kinds210.988%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 55 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @saasstuff. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (27.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,230 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Схема go to market онлайн директорий Походу все делают каталоги софта, ради того, чтобы твой сайт получил кросс-линк с домена с жирным Domain Rating. Типа Mini G2 / Mini Capterra. Меня забомбили разные сайты с оффером за бабки туда попасть. И сразу ссылка на оплату от $29. Как нашли? Авто-парсер на публикацию сайта в других директориях. Я по предложению чата добавился на PeerPush, оттуда и нашли. Заодно и иные с…

👍1

6 Nov 2026, 05:51 UTC≈2,660 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Опросники Регаюсь на Intuit, чтобы добавить интеграцию Quickbooks И вот флешбеки.

🫡7

5 Nov 2026, 18:24 UTC≈3,220 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Закодить за 20 минут без ИИ на Си Просто оставлю это здесь. Вьетнамец с сижкой во рту печатает код! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiMHtc6l7xM 😂 379K просмотров

❤29😁11👍3👀2

5 Nov 2026, 05:04 UTC≈3,180 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Какие типы SaaS все-таки впадлу вайбкодить клиентам и лучше купить у вас? Новый выпуск в YouTube: https://youtu.be/NKY9hsqHCTI

🔥21👍2👀1

30 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC≈4,460 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

Собрал песню про пять аккаунтов Клода :)

😁10👍6🔥5

28 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC≈4,670 views59 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Чем моложе предприниматель, тем вероятность в его речи услышать слово "чистыми" при разговоре о выручке приближается к 100% Чисто наблюдения: Я: "Вадик, сколько выручка?" Вадик: "$18K чистыми" Вот оно молодое поколение смотрит в саму суть и им пофиг на термины "выручка" или "bookings".

👍32😁21❤3🔥2👏1

27 Oct 2026, 13:16 UTC≈4,780 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Колл центр AI Голосовые LLM стали чернокожими. Если это так, то в целом походу реально inbound sales с AI заменить. Вы только посмотрите видос "They're kidnapping niggas of the streets of Atlanta and putting them into computers and shi" Чат, я пропустил, это что за технология? Грок? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvF2-Qbb1mo p.s. original: https://x.com/RagavanThurair/status/2113671324400861645?s=20

🔥10⚡1👍1

23 Oct 2026, 05:31 UTC≈5,110 views49 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Главное правило продаж Оно как в покере Неважно сколько рук ты сыграл. Важно - как ты играл каждую руку. Потому что бывает не только, что кто выглядит что купит - купит, а кто выглядит и базарит словно не купит - не купит. Бывает, понторезы в итоге не покупают, а с виду скромный аутист - твой крупный клиент. Поэтому каждого надо отработать Если придется звонить - звонить. Если придется писать - писать.

❤35🔥8👍6

22 Oct 2026, 18:39 UTC≈4,970 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Переключение звука на Маке Кто-нибудь завайбкодьте мне по братски переключалку output audio device для мака или подскажите есть ли способ это сделать В теории Shortcuts, но я их так и не осилил. Я часто переключаюсь между микрофонами/наушниками и вот прям задолбало мышкой сквозь 2 уровня меню ходить p.s. Спасибо чату Решение нашлось - Vorssaint

❤9👌5👏2

22 Oct 2026, 05:26 UTC≈4,790 views51 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Проблема пяти аккаунтов Клода Мы на днях с парнями сделали на 40 онлайн человек зум мит, где обменялись опытом че кто кодит, как деплоит и сколько стоит это все кодить. Главная причина нужды в N аккаунтах Claude Code / Codex - это "миллион строк кода". Конечно, клоду не хватает контекстного лимита, чтобы управлять миллионом строк кода. Мне кажется вообще вот найдена причина, откуда компании миллионы баксов тратят …

👍32💯13❤5🆒1

21 Oct 2026, 06:55 UTC≈3,980 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как гоев нагревают на двухлетние подписки У меня есть один заброшенный проект, и по совпадению один сайт с похожим именем. И вот человек с рекламы кликнул на них и с него списали подписку за ДВА ГОДА на Клод. Потом человек осознал что произошло и пишет уже мне в саппорт, что "верните мне бабки". Я ему вежливо обьяснил, что "брат, это не я, у меня другая темка, но ты если че на чарджбек их разведи, тогда вернут" …

👍10🙈10❤9

20 Oct 2026, 08:14 UTC≈3,780 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Кажется я понял проблему с Creem.io Дело не в банке, а в том что я невнимательно выбрал Individual account type. Передобавил счета как Business, попробуем - ждем следующее окно выплат (у Creem.io это 1 и 15 числа месяца)

👍17

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @saasstuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTCAnonymous Poll1,010 voters approx.

Дядьки, кто grok 4.6 тестил уже? говорят на уровне с fable

  1. Я не тестил51%
  2. Я - крутой инженер который шарит за код и читает код. Грок 4.6 топ3%
  3. Я - крутой инженер который шарит за код. Грок 4.6 средне/плохо3%
  4. Я вайбкодер и код не читаю. Грок 4.6 тестил и не понравилось, до fable не тащит2%
  5. Я вайбкодер и код не читаю. Грок 4.6 тестил и классно выдает3%
  6. Просто посмотрю результат37%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTCAnonymous Poll1,010 voters approx.

Какая стадия своих начинаний?

  1. Работаю работу24%
  2. Хочу свой проект, нет идеи16%
  3. Есть идея но не знаю с чего начать7%
  4. Уже запустил, не пойму правда где траф достать22%
  5. Запустил, знаю где траф но сил или бабок на него не8%
  6. Траф пошел но связка хуево конвертит или ее нет. Короче Юзеры в бабло не превращаются6%
  7. Пошли продажи но пока не сходится экономика3%
  8. Экономика сходится но хочется больше7%
  9. Я ничего из этого не умею, безработный и без планов но хочется результаты увидеть7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Венчур по Понятиям
@ventureStuff · 20,327
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов
@bossofyourboss · 27,282
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 62,560
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного
@aioftheday · 44,602
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,175
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SaaS по Понятиям” (@saasstuff), 9,737 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saasstuff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.