Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Startup Lynch

@startuplynch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

509subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216027443
TypeChannel
Username@startuplynch
DescriptionАнонсы новостей от Startup Lynch, честного разбора стартапов
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/startuplynch

Growth

5097 Aug 2026, 15:22 — 509 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:15 — 509 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:228 Aug 2026, 04:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 508–510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:15509no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:22509first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
586
Videos
15
Links
520

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2632.1%
2530.9%
👍1417.3%
👏67.41%
🤔56.17%
🤯33.70%
😱22.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 May 2026, 06:16 UTC129 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @startupstudionsuPhoto

⚡️ Startup Lynch прошёл — и 500 000 рублей нашли своих героев! В Арт ПАБе было громко: 15 команд вышли на сцену, чтобы за 3 минуты рассказать о своих проектах, ответить на вопросы экспертов и зала и побороться за призовой фонд. 🏆 Главный приз — 150 000 рублей — получил проект Tandem AMR Решение для автоматизации паллетной логистики в узких проходах. 💸 По 70 000 рублей получили: — FusionDetect Panel — набор реагент

🔥7

15 May 2026, 09:36 UTC713 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Startup Lynch возвращается: приди и обменяй свой питч на реальные деньги Мы возвращаемся в Арт ПАБ, чтобы раздать полмиллиона рублей на ваши проекты. Формат максимально простой: сцена бара, микрофон, 3 минуты на рассказ о стартапе и 3 минуты на вопросы от экспертов и зала. Зачем в этом участвовать? Всё просто — это быстрый способ получить деньги на проект без лишней бюрократии. Например, победительница прошлого г

👏2🔥1

13 Apr 2026, 10:18 UTC268 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @startupstudionsuPhoto

🚀 Стартап-студия НГУ открывает инвестиционную сессию! Если ты получил грант «Студенческий стартап» или «Умник», реализуешь его прямо сейчас или подал заявку в этом году — это твой шанс перейти на следующий уровень. Что это такое? Очная встреча с инвестиционным комитетом Стартап-студии НГУ и партнёрами. Презентуешь проект — получаешь реальную возможность на рассмотрение инвестиционной сделки. 💬 Мария Галямова, гене

🔥1

23 Mar 2026, 09:59 UTC272 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nsuniversityPhoto

Стартап-студия НГУ запускает первый за Уралом курс по подготовке венчурных аналитиков📌 Стартап-студия Новосибирского государственного университета при поддержке инвестиционного синдиката «Койон» и фонда Университетской стартап-студии НГУ запускает первый за Уралом курс, который будет готовить венчурных аналитиков, специализирующихся на «глубоких технологиях» (Deep Tech). Обучение бесплатное, пилотный набор составит

🔥1

20 Mar 2026, 10:01 UTC268 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ventureStuffPhoto

Что видит инвестор в питчдеке за первые 30 секунд За годы в FunCubator и вообще в венчуре я насмотрелся сотни питчдеков. Решение “интересно” или “в мусорку” принимается очень быстро. Иногда хватает первых двух слайдов. Расскажу от чего у опытного инвестора дергается глаз, а от чего наоборот - хочется листать дальше. Красные флаги: 1/ Выручки нет, а на слайде “Team” уже два адвайзера. Братан, у тебя ноль долларов

2🤔1

13 Feb 2026, 08:29 UTC283 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что докатились, теперь Линч еще и в Максе Подключайтесь к нам по ссылке на всякий случай :-) https://max.ru/join/fFfQcGibBhoJ3VNUS45SFM40nGn2nNdPQMLJnnoN6r4

🤔4🤯3😱21👏1

10 Feb 2026, 06:49 UTC256 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @startupstudionsuPhoto

⚡ Открываем набор в Catalyst.pro — акселератор для проектов, готовых к выходу на рынок Есть идея или прототип, но непонятно, как двигаться дальше? Кому продавать, как привлечь первых клиентов, где искать финансирование? Catalyst.pro создан именно для этого. Что это? Catalyst.pro — новый формат акселерационной программы Стартап-студии НГУ, развитие акселератора Catalyst, который мы проводим с 2022 года. Главное отл

1

20 Jan 2026, 08:40 UTC252 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ну и материал от самой стартап студии на эту тему, который объясняет что будет происходить

20 Jan 2026, 08:40 UTC284 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @startupstudionsu

Выиграли конкурс НТИ! 🎉 НГУ получил 2 акселератора на 2026 год — Catalyst и Catalyst.Pro Платформа НТИ объявила результаты конкурсного отбора: из 210 заявок от вузов отобрали 151. Мы в их числе, причём сразу с двумя программами. Что это значит для нас? Запускаем двухступенчатую систему акселерации: Осень — Catalyst Классический формат: от идеи до прототипа за семестр Весна — Catalyst.Pro (старт в феврале) Новая

4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @startuplynch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 747,637 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Startup Lynch” (@startuplynch), 509 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startuplynch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.