Венчурный инвестор Андрей Резинкин о привлечении инвестиций в стартапы.
Обо мне https://t.me/startup_venture/218
Запросить инвестиции [email protected]
Реклама и консультации https://t.me/rezinkin_bot
РКН: https://clck.ru/3QzTSL
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +2,236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,022–16,928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 01:09
16,593
+21
8 Nov 2026, 19:22
16,572
-6
7 Nov 2026, 15:15
16,578
+18
6 Nov 2026, 16:26
16,560
+53
5 Nov 2026, 15:47
16,507
+49
4 Nov 2026, 13:09
16,458
-19
3 Nov 2026, 10:29
16,477
-12
2 Nov 2026, 11:05
16,489
-5
1 Nov 2026, 13:45
16,494
-3
31 Oct 2026, 14:20
16,497
-7
30 Oct 2026, 15:14
16,504
-10
29 Oct 2026, 11:41
16,514
+28
28 Oct 2026, 10:40
16,486
+16
27 Oct 2026, 13:31
16,470
+16
26 Oct 2026, 16:59
16,454
+100
25 Oct 2026, 20:10
16,354
+16
24 Oct 2026, 16:39
16,338
-4
23 Oct 2026, 14:49
16,342
+25
22 Oct 2026, 16:47
16,317
+41
21 Oct 2026, 13:51
16,276
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 16,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.722%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
62 (10 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
36,588
Reactions total
264
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 17:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
628
Videos
30
Links
795
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
738 reactions across 49 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
361
48.9%
🔥
266
36.0%
custom 5312451830175796274
111
15.0%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 962 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 62 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startup_venture. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.61%
1 of 62 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,670
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,010
over 61 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJq5HVqysU6TkyuuNhNtjHz49FHKftrk79AT2RK
1
9 November 2026
9 November 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кто нужен AI-бизнесу в 2027
В четверг буду модерировать онлайн-панель, где поспорим о том, как AI меняет бизнес. Не про то, что умеет очередная модель, а про то, кто нужен рядом с ней. Мы с Сашей Журавлёвым будем отвечать за взгляд инвесторов, остальные спикеры — фаундеры, которые уже перестроили свои компании вокруг AI.
О чём спорим:
🟢Компании дорастают до миллионов выручки с командой из пяти человек. Зачем им то…
16 лет назад за такой отчёт мне платили зарплату
По образованию я математик-экономист. После бакалавриата пошёл финансовым аналитиком в группу компаний. Каждый день выглядел одинаково: выгружаешь данные из учётной системы, сводишь их в Excel и готовишь анализ финансово-хозяйственной деятельности. На это уходил целый день, и за это мне платили зарплату.
В проекте из этого поста у фаундера не было готового P&L. Он пр…
Кэш-машина без приборной панели
В августе я писал, как мы сказали фаундеру «не ходи в венчур». На панели 28 октября спорили почти о том же: остался ли у SaaS венчурный потенциал или пора строить кэш-машины.
Но у кэш-машины есть подвох. Раз она печатает деньги для нас, а не для инвестора, нужно точно знать, сколько она печатает. Сколько бизнес зарабатывает на самом деле, какие клиенты делают выручку, сколько можно в…
Почему не Claude Code?
В новом видео разбираю Creative Engines, проект на pre-seed, запрос $300K. Это платформа для маркетинговых агентств. Она строит модель того, как думает аудитория бренда, собирает цепочку сообщений под разные каналы и до запуска прогоняет каждое из них на симулированных покупателях.
На слайде с трекшн 76 интервью с клиентами, итог 3 платящих клиента. Выяснилось, что ни один из трёх не попадает…
Тысяча заявок в месяц ещё не трекшн. Что показать инвестору вместо них
Когда собираешь GTM-слайд, очень хочется поставить туда большую цифру лидов. Тысяча заявок в месяц выглядит солидно, и кажется, что это и есть трекшн.
Я и сам так думал, когда начинал свой бизнес. А когда перешел на темную сторону в инвестиции, первым делом стал спрашивать: а сколько из них заплатили?
Дело в том, что лид ещё не клиент. В B2B за…
Кто нужен AI-бизнесу в 2027: спорим о командах, маркетинге и деньгах
Код пишет AI, креативы генерирует AI, звонки продажников разбирает AI. Компании вырастают до миллионов выручки с командами, которые раньше считались бы стартапом на пять человек. Главный вопрос теперь не в том, что умеет AI, а в том, кто нужен рядом с ним.
12 ноября на онлайн-панели спорим об этом с теми, кто уже перестраивает свой бизнес вокруг A…
Час вместо недели: как я теперь провожу первичный due diligence
После двух созвонов с фаундером мы договорились о следующем шаге. Проект на ранней стадии с живыми продажами, и ребята хотят поднимать pre-seed. Как я действовал 2-3 года назад: ещё пара созвонов, презентация и папка документов в Google Drive.
Как происходит сейчас. Я завёл приватный репозиторий на GitHub и пригласил туда фаундера и его операционного п…
Знакомьтесь, Next Unicorn: самый средний стартап Америки
Когда фаундеры собирают первую команду, чаще всего всплывают два вопроса:
Какую долю дать первому сотруднику?
и
Какой опцион норм для эдвайзера?
Я взял свежий отчёт Carta о найме и компенсациях и собрал из него Next Unicorn, стартап у которой каждый показатель ровно по медиане рынка.
На карточках видно, когда Next Unicorn нанимает первых людей, какую долю от…
Из-за чего вы можете закрыться?
Если честно, закрыться мы можем только по одной причине — если нам не дадут денег
Так недавно ответил фаундер на созвоне, и я тут же вспомнил наш стартап для кофеен. Мы уже прогнали его через one-liner, клиентов поимённо, звонки клиентам и кладбище стартапов. Пора задать ему вопрос, который фаундеры не любят больше всего.
Ответ «закроемся, если не дадут денег» звучит честно, но на не…
У нас нет конкурентов, мы создаём новый рынок
Классика от ранних фаундеров. Иногда идет с бонусом:
Даже те, кого можно назвать конкурентами, на самом деле наши будущие клиенты
Такой финт хорошо работает на мотивационном саммите, когда ты выходишь на сцену сразу после Тони Роббинса и нужно сказать что-то вдохновляющее. Но инвестора, особенно отчасти циничного (как я), этим не убедить. Что слышу я: если конкурентов не…
Нет денег — нет клиентов — нет инвесторов — нет денег: как разорвать замкнутый круг
На разборе после питч-сессии в клубе MFS всплыл классический замкнутый круг, в который попадает почти каждый hardware- и regulated-стартап.
Фаундер Артём делает умные детские игрушки с подпиской на контент и продаёт их через партнёров, детские приложения.
Партнёры говорят: «Подпишем, когда закончите сертификацию». Инвесторы говорят:…
🔥22❤4custom 53124518301757962741
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @startup_venture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@startup_venture edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @startup_venture as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Индекс дятла @dindex · 22,222 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Венчур по Понятиям @ventureStuff · 20,327 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
Русский венчур @rusven · 24,986 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
СберСтартап @sberstartup · 40,941 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 29 August 2026
The Edinorog 🦄 @Theedinorogblog · 44,082 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Кирилл Фомичев @fomichevkirill · 28,791 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Стартап дня. Александр Горный. @startupoftheday · 62,560 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Витрина стартапов @showstartup · 26,848 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Rinat Aliev | Channel @telega_Rinata · 20,629 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
e/acc @cryptoEssay · 63,613 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика @temno · 79,175 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного @aioftheday · 44,602 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
kyrillic @kyrillic · 61,235 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Силиконовый Мешок @prompt_design · 92,791 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Квест Теория Каст и Ролей @alexkrol · 18,735 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Money For Startup Андрей Резинкин” (@startup_venture), 16,593 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startup_venture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.