Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SolidTradesz 堅固

Channel

SolidTradesz 堅固

@solidtradesz

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,612subscribers

+617 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001899654674
TypeChannel
Username@solidtradesz
DescriptionOfficial Public Telegram group of https://twitter.com/SolidTradesz Chat: @solidtradeszchat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2022 and 31 July 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/solidtradesz

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@solidtradesz/2574 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC@pandacalls0/62148 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC1.0059 minutes
@solidtradesz/2644 · this entry22 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC@pandacalls0/640422 Sept 2026, 12:53 UTC1.0014 minutes
@solidtradesz/2669 · this entry29 Sept 2026, 10:07 UTC@pandacalls0/642929 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC1.002.7 hours
@solidtradesz/2682 · this entry2 Oct 2026, 07:40 UTC@pandacalls0/64382 Oct 2026, 10:51 UTC1.003.2 hours
@solidtradesz/2706 · this entry12 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTC@pandacalls0/647512 Oct 2026, 18:49 UTC1.003.8 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@pandacalls05 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.7 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 37 comparable posts for this entry, running 15 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

20,88725,78423,335.522,6127 August 202613 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net +617. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,152–26,519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 17:2022,612-270
11 Nov 2026, 00:5622,882-237
9 Nov 2026, 09:0923,119-175
7 Nov 2026, 20:5623,294-201
6 Nov 2026, 18:0923,495-82
5 Nov 2026, 15:5423,577-176
4 Nov 2026, 16:1623,753-153
3 Nov 2026, 16:0023,906-41
2 Nov 2026, 16:2723,947-41
1 Nov 2026, 18:2923,988-124
31 Oct 2026, 18:2624,112-110
30 Oct 2026, 15:5624,222-142
29 Oct 2026, 16:0024,364-133
28 Oct 2026, 15:2024,497-101
27 Oct 2026, 12:5924,598-99
26 Oct 2026, 12:1924,697-162
25 Oct 2026, 12:2524,859-97
24 Oct 2026, 09:1624,956-154
23 Oct 2026, 08:5625,110-41
22 Oct 2026, 09:2625,151first reading

Engagement

124 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 143 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.16%
avg views ÷ 22,612 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,070
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 124 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held124 (14 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total39,350
Reactions total992
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,440
Videos
≈7
Links
≈812

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7,002 reactions across 124 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,11330.2%
❤1,54622.1%
🔥1,10215.7%
👏3605.14%
🥰3434.90%
🤩3274.67%
💯3184.54%
🤯2904.14%
👀2213.16%
🥴600.857%
🫡450.643%
😭440.628%
🙏410.586%
🤔360.514%
🤝270.386%
😁250.357%
👌240.343%
🐳210.3%
🤣150.214%
🤨110.157%
8 further kinds330.471%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,002 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 124 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @solidtradesz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 124 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (5.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,740 views31 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

The $ETH chart is so ugly (like most others btw) 💀

👍14❤5🥴5🤔4😭3

12 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,690 views54 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

$GRAM green on the day 🤨

🔥27👍18👀6🤯2🤨1

12 Nov 2026, 13:57 UTC≈1,520 views34 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @SolidIntelX

INTEL: Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang out | Per Bloomberg CFO Colette Kress has been named interim CEO while the board searches for a permanent successor Twitter | News

👍10🥴7👀6🔥6🤩5

11 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,850 views67 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Buying $PENGU here will reward me greatly

❤28👍19🔥13👏5🤝2

11 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,800 views59 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Alts in a good accumulation zone imo

👍15🔥15❤12💯10👏7

5 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC≈2,290 views50 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

$LINK ready for the generational run

❤24🔥15🤯7👏3👌1

4 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC≈2,190 views35 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Onchain sendy

❤14👍11👏5🥰3🤯2

4 Nov 2026, 09:54 UTC≈2,060 views58 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

I like $PENGU here as well With midterms out of the way its time to ship it

❤20👍15💯13🤯7👌3

4 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,880 views64 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

$BTC looks solid here

👍21🥰18❤14👏7🤯4

31 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,080 views38 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @SolidIntelXPhoto

INTEL: Binance says 90% of $6.3B hack losses have been replenished, with 10 major assets fully backed - BTC, ETH, USDT, BNB, SOL, USDC, XRP, USD1, RLUSD and ZEC are now reportedly 100% backed. - The remaining 10% consists of less liquid tokens still being acquired through market and OTC channels. - Replenishment draws on SAFU, the Futures insurance fund and corporate treasury. A new Proof of Reserves snapshot was t…

❤14🤯8👀7👏7🫡2

26 Oct 2026, 19:09 UTC≈2,210 views53 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Been deeply locked in building Solid Intel 📡 these last few days Can’t say much yet. But it’ll make sense soon. Trust me on this one

💯22👍12🤩10🤯5👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @solidtradesz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @solidtradesz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Persian Cooks 🔮
@persiancooks · 3,458
#1
Poseidon Kitchen
@poseidonkitchen · 10,867
#2
TraderKoz TA
@TraderKozz · 5,607
#3
Crypto Vikings (Premium signals)
@VikingsAnalyst · 36,682
#4
Whale whispers
@whalewhisperscrypto · 3,387
#5
Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom
@pwnlord · 8,386
#6
Trade Talks
@tradetalksbyTaqwa · 4,114
#7
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 28,420
#8
Underwater Apes 🦍
@underwaterapesclub · 669
#9
Ponzi Trades
@ponzitrades · 6,711
#10
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 69,431
#11
Femto XBT
@femtoxbt · 1,404
#12
Rose 🌹
@rose · 84,958
#13
Crypto Cove
@CryptoCove · 28,693
#14
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 13,858
#15
CBA Trades
@CBATrades · 1,293
#16
Ahboyash Reads
@ahboyashreads · 15,960
#17
TeamParasWhales 🦅💸
@TeamPandPwhales · 559
#18
Heisenberg’The one who trades’👁️🦅
@heisenbergtrades · 294
#19
‘pro’fessional gambling
@mo_xbt · 1,445
#20
Scient Club
@scientclub · 7,997
#21
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 115,515
#22
ExitLiqCapital Calls
@exitliqcapital · 1,483
#23
Innit For The Tech
@innitfortech · 5,618
#24
CrypNuevo updates 🔨
@CrypNuevoTA · 18,594
#25
meowzinomics
@meowzinom1cs · 993
#26
Tree News
@TreeNewsFeed · 35,548
#27
Trader Mayne’s TA
@officialtradermayne · 26,249
#28
Anbessa's Alpha
@AnbessasAlphaTG · 11,229
#29
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,776
#30
Crypto Narratives
@cryptonarratives1 · 21,594
#31
CRYPTO CROW
@CrowTA · 4,580
#32
Jamie's Cave👨🏻‍💻
@jamiescave · 13,270
#33
(Not)Financial advice with Makk & AM17
@MakkAM17TA · 1,565
#34
Zoomer News
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,625
#35
Falcon Trading✍🏻
@FalconPremiumSignals · 4,751
#36
DaanCrypto Updates 🔔
@DaanCryptoTG · 6,891
#37
degen trading
@degentradinghouse · 7,820
#38
EmperorBTC Channel
@EmperorbtcTA · 89,058
#39
🚨Crypto Bully
@CryptoDBully · 6,582
#40
Guru
@cryptoguru2602 · 964
#41
Noodles 2025 Market Intelligence Event
@noodlestrade · 6,226
#42
Ian's Intel
@iansintel · 15,593
#43
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 110,922
#44
Dr.Profit 🚀
@Therealdrprofit · 53,677
#45
Delbert's Trading Team
@delbert_trading · 5,761
#46
Charlie's Charts
@CharliesCharts · 4,011
#47
AstronomerZero
@AstronomerZero · 9,713
#48
Billzformation
@billzformation · 941
#49
infinityhedge
@infinityhedge · 45,349
#50
BULL HOUSE Perps + 💎
@Official_Bull_BNB · 16,101
#51
PhoenixNews (Only Important)
@PhoenixNewsImportant · 5,164
#52
Whale_of_DXB
@Whale_of_dxb1 · 678
#53
Mexc signals
@freemecxsignals · 254
#54
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,000
#55
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,224
#56
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,122
#57
itscorrekt
@itscorrekt · 3,249
#58
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,047
#59
mainachad TA
@mainachadTA · 1,344
#60
unfolded.
@unfolded · 116,547
#61
Revival Journal (Educational, Setups) - Public
@revivalcryptochannel · 2,705
#62
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,113
#63
CRYPTO KNIGHT
@cryptoknight890 · 12,289
#64
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,429
#65
Soap Capital (Fight Club)
@Soap_Capital · 5,302
#66
SandalwoodXBT Trades
@SandalwoodXBT_Trades · 465
#67
Moustache TA
@MoustacheTA · 7,711
#68
Harsh Charts
@harshcharts · 589
#69
Kaizen Trades
@Kaizentrades · 753
#70
LiquidityLab Notices
@LiquidityLabChanel · 588
#71
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 296,074
#72
MAVERICKS Community
@MavericksCommunity · 3,886
#73
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,118
#74
Ameba’s lounge
@amebaslounge · 1,224
#75
Modo Capital
@modocapital · 2,100
#76
Crypto Candy 💎
@CryptoCandy24x · 12,886
#77
@fartcoins
@fartcoins · 476
#78
€urosniper Degen
@EurosniperDegen · 5,211
#79
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈
@teammacnbtc · 32,070
#80
方程式新闻 BWEnews
@BWEnews · 72,455
#81

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CrypNuevo updates 🔨
@CrypNuevoTA · 18,594
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 October 2026
Trader Mayne’s TA
@officialtradermayne · 26,249
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈
@teammacnbtc · 32,070
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Koroush AK 👁
@koroush_ak_tg · 43,372
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
EmperorBTC Channel
@EmperorbtcTA · 89,058
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SolidTradesz 堅固” (@solidtradesz), 22,612 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solidtradesz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.