Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kirby Crypto

Channel

Kirby Crypto

@kirbycrypto

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

37,859subscribers

-3,659 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831680966
TypeChannel
Username@kirbycrypto
DescriptionSharing the latest news and alpha, feel free to share! Frens gib alpha Feel free to dm me @kirbyongeo Follow on X: https://twitter.com/kirbyongeo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held67
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kirbycrypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@kirbycrypto/2015 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC@moecrypto/3100130 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC1.0020 minutes
@kirbycrypto/2017 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC@moecrypto/3100431 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC1.0018 minutes
@kirbycrypto/2024 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC@moecrypto/310073 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC1.0014 minutes
@kirbycrypto/2027 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC@moecrypto/310124 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC1.0015 minutes
@kirbycrypto/2028 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 02:42 UTC@moecrypto/310155 Aug 2026, 02:57 UTC1.0014 minutes
@kirbycrypto/2029 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC@moecrypto/310175 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC1.0011 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@moecrypto10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 minutesthis entry (10–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 111 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @kirbycrypto — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

37,85941,51839,688.56 August 202611 November 2026
67 measurements spanning 97 days, net -3,659. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,310–42,067 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:0737,859-24
9 Nov 2026, 16:3537,883-31
8 Nov 2026, 09:5837,914-24
7 Nov 2026, 07:0637,938-23
6 Nov 2026, 06:5937,961-11
5 Nov 2026, 06:0037,972-15
4 Nov 2026, 05:5637,987-20
3 Nov 2026, 08:3038,007-10
2 Nov 2026, 07:2738,017-28
1 Nov 2026, 06:3638,045-20
31 Oct 2026, 10:0838,065-19
30 Oct 2026, 13:3738,084-29
29 Oct 2026, 10:5638,113-25
28 Oct 2026, 10:4938,138-81
27 Oct 2026, 13:1038,219-12
26 Oct 2026, 16:4038,231-17
25 Oct 2026, 16:0938,248-729
24 Oct 2026, 16:4038,977-26
23 Oct 2026, 19:3739,003-18
22 Oct 2026, 21:0039,021first reading

Engagement

160 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.94%
avg views ÷ 37,859 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,870
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.454%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 160 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held160 (27 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total91,640
Reactions total387
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 11:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈397
Videos
≈6
Links
≈1,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,001 reactions across 134 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤99749.8%
🔥57928.9%
😁1286.40%
🥰452.25%
👌381.90%
🤯291.45%
🫡261.30%
😱251.25%
💯241.20%
🎉180.9%
🙏170.85%
🤪170.85%
👀160.8%
👏110.55%
custom 597218755735244307780.4%
🌚80.4%
🤔50.25%
🤝40.2%
✍30.15%
❤‍🔥20.1%
1 further kind10.05%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,005 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
74
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 160 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kirbycrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 160 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (22.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,640 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026

One of the best investor presentations I've seen on what Hyperliquid is and why it matters. Worth a read. Share it with your tradfi friends, bankers, instis, funds. https://hypestrat.xyz/presentations/introduction-to-hyperliquid

❤8

9 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,280 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026

APEX Vault 2 crosses $3.6M in deposits Vault 1 closed its 90-day cycle with: 🔸 +37.65% gross APR 🔸 -3.68% max drawdown 🔸 1.03% avg net exposure Vault 2 is the next live cycle, running the same cross-asset, USD-neutral strategy. If you've wanted exposure to quant-style, institutional-grade perp returns on Hyperliquid without running the book yourself, this is the time. Link to vault ⏳ Deposits close 11 Nov, 12:00…

❤3

9 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,330 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤4custom 59721875573524430771

Signed Kirby Crypto Grok

8 Nov 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,410 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤5

Signed Kirby Crypto Grok

7 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,550 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤4

Signed Kirby Crypto Grok

7 Nov 2026, 00:17 UTC≈1,590 views0 reactionsread 13 November 2026

US Treasury to ban crypto exchange MEXC Global from the US financial system → Take your money off MEXC if you still have any funds there Bubblemaps to expose a crypto KOL for secretly extracting millions / Sahil exposing KOLS like Ansem for paid deals Gnosis Pay customer data leaked - includes details like name, address, email, phone number, full card details and wallet addresses linked → This is absolutely insane.…

6 Nov 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,530 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

TxFlow live on Treadfi → https://app.txflow.com/r/TXKIRBY Treadfi will charge 0 builder fees on txflow for the first few weeks. Time to push some volume and get points. Still pretty early, currently in epoch 4, usually better to farm early than late. Steps 1) Go to https://app.txflow.com/r/TXKIRBY, verify + deposit funds 2) Go to https://app.tread.fi/referral/5TF7FD9T, sign up (wallet) 3) Setup treadfi > connect p…

❤2

6 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,420 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Does anyone want Intel Trade codes? Have like 5 left to give out, lmk what ur trading vol is, limited so want to make sure it goes to the right hands Pretty sick, alot of cool features too, one that i really like is you get to see all the counterparties within each candle, their wallets, purchase/sale, dig into their wallets etc

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @kirbycrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Crypto Narratives
@cryptonarratives1 · 21,623
#1
Cookie Reads 🍪
@cookiesreads · 8,947
#2
Crypto Mumbles
@cryptomumbles · 9,341
#3
HypurrCo Announcements
@hypurrco · 2,734
#4
Threading on the Edge
@threadingontheedge · 7,669
#5
Olimpio Alpha ⚡️
@OlimpioAlpha · 17,186
#6
Chung Daily Note📒
@chungdailynote · 5,641
#7
Bullpen Research
@BullpenBrief · 9,541
#8
Alpha with Artemis
@artemisalpha · 724
#9
₿izFeed - [IN REVAMP] DeFi focused Crypto, Business and Finance news
@BizFeed · 3,822
#10
@iykyk
@iykyk · 3,491
#11
Bennie Reads 🟣 📖
@BennieReads · 1,665
#12
Simplicity Group Alpha
@SimplicityGroup · 1,780
#13
Ahboyash Reads
@ahboyashreads · 15,960
#14
C4
@c4dotgg · 18,768
#15
Shoal Research Hub
@shoalresearch · 12,345
#16
Ian's Intel
@iansintel · 15,593
#17
infinityhedge
@infinityhedge · 45,385
#18
Crypto Goodreads
@cryptogoodreads · 19,849
#19
SecondLane OTC - Announcements
@RedactedOTC · 8,806
#20
Overheard on CT - Kaito
@overheardonct · 9,431
#21
Alpha
@marketsAlpha · 24,942
#22
Anteater’s Amazon
@AnteaterAmazon · 11,494
#23
Gong Jiao Wei 巩娇玮
@gongjiaoweiy · 4,673
#24
degen trading
@degentradinghouse · 7,820
#25
unfolded. DeFi
@unfolded_defi · 21,627
#26
One Crypto Feed with Avalanche
@onecryptofeed · 8,663
#27
Crypto Fundraising (StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦)
@crypto_fundraising · 27,552
#28
Tree News
@TreeNewsFeed · 35,497
#29
unfolded.
@unfolded · 116,547
#30
DL News | News Feed
@dlnewsinfo · 6,099
#31
Leviathan News
@leviathan_news · 9,277
#32
Zoomer News
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,604
#33
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,776
#34
andy's journal
@ayyyeandy · 6,926
#35
Cautious bull run enjoyers
@smolinsanity · 13,964
#36
Web3_weekly
@web3_weekly · 1,889
#37
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,429
#38
Investing Beanstock
@investingbeanstock · 5,950
#39
QCP Broadcast
@QCPbroadcast · 13,352
#40
Delphi Digital Research
@DelphiDigitalAlerts · 7,481
#41
defiprime
@defiprime · 13,081
#42
Tradehaven
@tradehaven · 9,567
#43
Moonbags Markets
@moonbagsnotes · 1,404
#44
Investigations by ZachXBT
@investigations · 112,019
#45
Paradigm
@Paradigm_research · 4,385
#46
The Block | Crypto News Feed
@the_block_crypto · 24,288
#47
Officer's Channel
@officer_cia · 10,401
#48
ComeCircle Musings
@comecircle_alfa · 1,233
#49
Layergg exchange & project alert
@layergg · 19,277
#50
Paulie's Cannoli Emporium
@PauliesCannoli · 2,612
#51
Lobster Daily 🦞
@lobsters_daily · 6,491
#52
ICO Drops - ICO News & Alerts
@icodrops · 41,860
#53
blocmates bulletin - daily frontier tech news.
@blocmatesbulletin · 2,349
#54
Drops Analytics
@drops_analytics · 565,306
#55
alpha please
@alphapleaseupdates · 4,260
#56
Jlabs Digital
@jlabsdigital · 6,164
#57
Toms alpha nfa dyor etc
@tomsalpha · 2,540
#58
itscorrekt
@itscorrekt · 3,254
#59
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 115,515
#60
New Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,134
#61
Agaricus bisporus (Louis)
@LouisCooperCrypto · 3,824
#62
Antirug Calls
@antirug_calls · 4,128
#63
Airdrop Official 🍥
@airdropofficial7 · 25,989
#64
ASXN
@asxn_r · 1,235
#65
Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom
@pwnlord · 8,386
#66
Jamie's Cave👨🏻‍💻
@jamiescave · 13,270
#67
Noodles 2025 Market Intelligence Event
@noodlestrade · 6,226
#68
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 110,922
#69
bosslee caipng store 😭
@goingonchain · 1,968
#70
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,122
#71
Defizard Threads | DT
@thedefiwizard · 5,196
#72
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,694
#73
Kt008 Crypto Alerts
@ktt008 · 667
#74
CT Live Feed (Automated)
@CTLIVEFEED · 814
#75
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 79,925
#76
Fomo AppStore Position (ex. Coinbase position)
@coinbaseappstore · 15,196
#77
0xilluminati - WEB3 JOBS (HIRING / LOOKING)
@illuminatiJOBS · 8,120
#78
Trader Mayne’s TA
@officialtradermayne · 26,249
#79
Talent@Web3
@talentatweb3 · 9,455
#80
Wu Blockchain News
@wublockchainenglish · 213,005
#81
OTC Buy/Sell - Global Deal List
@private_markets · 3,728
#82
Stacy in Dataland (´⊙~⊙`)
@muur_posts · 7,976
#83

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Narratives
@cryptonarratives1 · 21,623
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
Investigations by ZachXBT
@investigations · 112,019
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
Alpha
@marketsAlpha · 24,942
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Crypto Daku
@cryptodakuofficial · 45,843
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto Fundraising (StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦)
@crypto_fundraising · 27,552
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
The Woke Salaryman
@thewokesalaryman · 34,135
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
infinityhedge
@infinityhedge · 45,385
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Monad Announcements
@monad_xyz · 36,890
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
The Block | Crypto News Feed
@the_block_crypto · 24,288
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Mantle Announcements
@mantlenews · 69,903
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
unfolded. DeFi
@unfolded_defi · 21,627
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
ICO Analytics (StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦)
@ico_analytic · 55,761
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Web3 Jobs
@web3hiring · 61,011
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Drops Analytics
@drops_analytics · 565,306
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Seedly Personal Finance SG
@personalfinancesg · 50,741
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto Goodreads
@cryptogoodreads · 19,849
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 September 2026
ICO Drops - ICO News & Alerts
@icodrops · 41,860
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
HDB
@singaporeHDB · 51,672
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
SpotOnChain | Announcement
@spotonchain · 20,938
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 September 2026
unfolded.
@unfolded · 116,547
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈
@teammacnbtc · 32,126
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Glassnode
@glassnode · 43,648
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
CryptoJobsList | Web3 Jobs
@cryptojobslist · 62,094
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Tree News
@TreeNewsFeed · 35,497
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kirby Crypto” (@kirbycrypto), 37,859 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kirbycrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.