Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for (Not)Financial advice with Makk & AM17

Channel

(Not)Financial advice with Makk & AM17

@MakkAM17TA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,638subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267866169
TypeChannel
Username@MakkAM17TA
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MakkAM17TA

Growth

1,6381,6431,640.57 August 2026 — 1,643 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,643 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,640 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,641 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,638 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,637–1,644 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:271,638-3
14 Aug 2026, 04:481,641+1
11 Aug 2026, 05:451,640-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:561,643no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:161,643first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 1,638 subscribers
Avg views / post
197
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,163
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1135.5%
😁929.0%
🔥825.8%
🥰26.45%
👏13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I really do expect $pvrse to make another run back to the highs. Its one of those patience plays that will full send when no one expects it to. Team are fully based

3

Signed CryptoAm17

3 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC171 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2084023872211595753

Signed CryptoAm17

31 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC225 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://dexscreener.com/solana/Fm9n9Du8cz4m1vx8JbjN48kBncLPs9tf2uFy2P7TJRiR Aped some of this, posts has millions of views, feels undervalued 100x or 0

😁1

Signed CryptoAm17

29 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC191 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aped some $VERITY Been seeing it around a lot, millions of views, 20k mc, deffo worth a gamble imo

Signed CryptoAm17

29 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC185 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://dexscreener.com/solana/2Hg7xqFU6jHuKbQU3cEKShATdqP9rxdTjHFMNiRY9SRZ

Signed CryptoAm17

28 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC203 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Been buying some more $pvrse lately, still holding from before and the team have been cooking behind the scenese Expecting this one to rally soon once people start catching on

3🔥2😁2

Signed CryptoAm17

28 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC174 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://dexscreener.com/solana/2qagURk5JQwT2kanmtoXfCLPgB2uE4Bp2WSFcBaTizUk

Signed CryptoAm17

19 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC230 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Whose winning tonight ?

  1. Spain 🇪🇸70%
  2. Argentina 🇦🇷36%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1

Signed CryptoAm17

18 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC226 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I've been buying more of these coins for now

🔥2

Signed CryptoAm17

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MakkAM17TA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

Whose winning tonight ?

  1. Spain 🇪🇸70%
  2. Argentina 🇦🇷36%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 374,700 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

EmperorBTC Channel
@EmperorbtcTA · 92,207
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(Not)Financial advice with Makk & AM17” (@MakkAM17TA), 1,638 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MakkAM17TA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.