Posted without readable text
Signed jaehong.Yoon

Channel
@qooowooo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,673subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622911889 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qooowooo |
| Created | 14 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qooowooo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 6,673 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 6,664 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 6,663 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 6,664 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 41,869 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 62.5% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 37.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
Signed jaehong.Yoon
'ETF가 선택한 종목들(한국/해외)(8/12)' 요약
Signed jaehong.Yoon
ETF가 선택한 종목들(해외 주식형)(8/12)∥미래에셋증권 윤재홍 *국내 상장 해외 주식형 ETF의 편입/편출 내역. 비중 변동은 PDF를 기준으로, 편입의 경우 신규 편입에 따른 비중/편출은 편출 직전 비중 *순자산총액 500억 원 이상. New 편입은 과거 60거래일 내 편입 이력이 없는 종목 [텔레] https://t.me/qooowooo #특징 - [편입] PARAMOUNT SKYDANCE CL B, AEM US 08/21/26 C200 Equity, MongoDB Inc(MDB US), 외 8개 - [편출] QNBWQ6C2 29490 INDEX, Carpenter Technology Corp(CRS US), Timken Co/The(TKR US), 외 7개 - [New 편입] PARAMOUNT SKYDANCE CL B, …
Signed jaehong.Yoon
ETF가 선택한 종목들(한국 주식형)(8/12)∥미래에셋증권 윤재홍 *국내 상장 한국 주식형 ETF의 편입/편출 내역. 비중 변동은 PDF를 기준으로, 편입의 경우 신규 편입에 따른 비중/편출은 편출 직전 비중 *순자산총액 500억 원 이상. New 편입은 과거 60거래일 내 편입 이력이 없는 종목 [텔레] https://t.me/qooowooo #특징 - [편입] 하림지주(003380), 리노공업(058470), 제주반도체(080220), 외 18개 - [편출] 티에스이(131290) - [New 편입] 없음 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ # KoAct 코스닥액티브(0163Y0 KS, 4,733억 원)/중소형주 액티브 (+) 편입 하림지주(003380)(+0.3%p) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ # TIME 코리아밸류업액티브(495…
❤1
Signed jaehong.Yoon
ETF로 보는 글로벌 자산 동향(8/12)
Signed jaehong.Yoon
ETF Map (8/11)
Signed jaehong.Yoon
S&P 500 Map (8/11)
Signed jaehong.Yoon
나스닥 100 Map (8/11)
Signed jaehong.Yoon
한국 ETF Investor Activity(8/11): 개인 순매수는 미국 대표 지수/커버드콜로∥미래에셋증권 윤재홍 [텔레] https://telegram.me/qooowooo <시장&자금 동향> • 8/11 한국 증시는 상승. 코스피 +0.73%, 코스닥 +0.39%. • [상승] 테마(테크), 반도체, 화장품, 보험, 소프트웨어, 헬스케어, 커버드콜 vs [하락] 방위, 조선해운, 중공업, ESG, 기계장비, 산업재 • 개인은 +2,096억(잠정치) 순매수. 미국 대표 지수/커버드콜 중심 • 은행은 +590억(잠정치) 순매수. 미국 대형주(+178억), 산업/반도체(+88억), 미국 대형 성장주(+79억), 한국 대형주(+43억) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ <개인 순매수 상위 카테고리(억원)> 전체: +2,096억 원 1.…
❤1
Signed jaehong.Yoon
한국 ETF Investor Activity(8/11): 개인 순매수는 미국 대표 지수/커버드콜로 요약
Signed jaehong.Yoon
[미래에셋 글로벌/한국 ETF] 윤재홍 pinned «[코스닥 Bi-Weekly] 승강재 미리보기∥미래에셋증권 윤재홍 ▼[자료 링크] https://han.gl/bkySx *리스트 내 일부 기업의 데이터가 잘못 기재되어 수정이 있었습니다(현재 수정완료). - 오류 내용: 코스닥 바이오 요건 기업(에이비엘바이오, 리가켐바이오, 올릭스, 씨젠)의 매출액/영업이익/자본총계 - 이용에 불편을 드려 죄송합니다. ▼ 코스닥 Level-UP의 시그널(6/1) https://han.gl/gSPOD 하반기 전망…»
Posted without readable text
Signed jaehong.Yoon
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @qooowooo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 250,315 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[미래에셋 글로벌/한국 ETF] 윤재홍” (@qooowooo), 6,673 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qooowooo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.