Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 알지노믹스 공식 IR/PR 채널

Channel

알지노믹스 공식 IR/PR 채널

@rznomics

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,139subscribers

+223 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004376339474
TypeChannel
Username@rznomics
Created27 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rznomics

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9161,1391,027.524 August 2026 — 916 subscribers25 August 2026 — 953 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,080 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,130 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,136 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,139 subscribers24 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 24 days, net +223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 883–1,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:211,139+3
13 Sept 2026, 05:161,136+6
9 Sept 2026, 10:381,130+50
4 Sept 2026, 00:161,080+52
31 Aug 2026, 12:051,028+75
25 Aug 2026, 04:53953+37
24 Aug 2026, 18:30916first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
797.2%
avg views ÷ 1,139 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,080
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.551%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held6 (27 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total9,080
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3661.0%
👏1322.0%
👍1016.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 00:21 UTC≈9,080 views50 reactionsread 24 August 2026

안녕하세요, RNA 유전자치료제 전문기업 알지노믹스입니다. 알지노믹스는 글로벌 빅파마 일라이 릴리의 이노베이션 허브인 미국 샌디에이고 ‘릴리 게이트웨이 랩스(Lilly Gateway Labs)’에 입주하여 독자적 RNA 플랫폼 기반 신약 개발 및 사업화를 본격 가속화합니다. 릴리의 혁신 생태계에서 200개 이상의 타겟 질환 유전자 뱅크 기반 파이프라인 개발을 가속화하는 한편, 미국 임상 인프라 구축 및 글로벌 파트너십 확대를 적극 추진할 계획입니다. 자세한 내용은 보도자료 전문을 확인해 주시기 바랍니다. 감사합니다. ▶️ 알지노믹스, 美 샌디에이고 ‘릴리 게이트웨이 랩스’ 합류 https://rznomics.com/bbs/?so_table=promote&mode=VIEW&num=174&category=&findType=&findWord=

27👏13👍10

27 Jul 2026, 04:18 UTCviews —

알지노믹스 공식 IR/PR 채널 pinned «알지노믹스 주주 및 투자자분들께, RNA 기반 유전자치료제 전문개발기업 알지노믹스의 공식 텔레그램 채널에 방문해주셔서 감사합니다. 알지노믹스는 독자적인 RNA 편집 플랫폼 기술을 바탕으로 희귀 난치성 질환 환자들에게 새로운 치료 대안을 제공하고, 이를 바탕으로 주주 가치를 제고하기 위해 최선을 다하고 있습니다. 본 채널은 주주 및 투자자 여러분께 당사의 사업현황을 신속하고 정확하게 전달 드리고자 개설되었습니다. 앞으로 투명한 소통을 이어나가며 투자자…»

27 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC≈1,220 views9 reactionsread 24 August 2026

알지노믹스 주주 및 투자자분들께, RNA 기반 유전자치료제 전문개발기업 알지노믹스의 공식 텔레그램 채널에 방문해주셔서 감사합니다. 알지노믹스는 독자적인 RNA 편집 플랫폼 기술을 바탕으로 희귀 난치성 질환 환자들에게 새로운 치료 대안을 제공하고, 이를 바탕으로 주주 가치를 제고하기 위해 최선을 다하고 있습니다. 본 채널은 주주 및 투자자 여러분께 당사의 사업현황을 신속하고 정확하게 전달 드리고자 개설되었습니다. 앞으로 투명한 소통을 이어나가며 투자자 여러분의 기대에 부응하기 위해 노력하겠습니다. ※본 채널의 모든 콘텐츠는 투자 권유를 목적으로 하지 않으며, 참고 자료로만 활용 가능합니다.

9

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @rznomics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“알지노믹스 공식 IR/PR 채널” (@rznomics), 1,139 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rznomics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.