Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Том Хэнсон🍌

@hansontom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

88,587subscribers

-145 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001438836419
TypeChannel
Username@hansontom
DescriptionРеклама: в сообщения канала. Машины на обзор туда же. YouTube: https://youtube.com/c/HANSONTOM Музыка из видео: @tomhansonmusic Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3RkPru
Created27 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hansontom

Growth

88,58788,73288,659.56 August 2026 — 88,732 subscribers7 August 2026 — 88,721 subscribers8 August 2026 — 88,690 subscribers9 August 2026 — 88,675 subscribers10 August 2026 — 88,639 subscribers11 August 2026 — 88,640 subscribers12 August 2026 — 88,612 subscribers13 August 2026 — 88,587 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88,565–88,754 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:2588,587-25
12 Aug 2026, 06:0688,612-28
11 Aug 2026, 08:0588,640+1
10 Aug 2026, 07:4288,639-36
9 Aug 2026, 05:0788,675-15
8 Aug 2026, 04:2788,690-31
7 Aug 2026, 07:3888,721-11
6 Aug 2026, 09:4688,732first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.1%
avg views ÷ 88,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,900
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held44 (30 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total1,096,400
Reactions total44,635
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,610
Videos
473
Links
543

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

44,635 reactions across 44 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣17,80139.9%
8,65019.4%
custom 53236972958022548658,33418.7%
🤝3,5287.90%
💊3,1016.95%
🔥1,9154.29%
🍌6401.43%
💅4941.11%
💔1720.385%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,635reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.27%
1 of 44 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
11,100
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
25,800
over 43 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquykDis113 August 202613 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈11,100 views247 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzquykDis

Мал золотник да дорог! https://youtu.be/vl4qRg5yHG4

149custom 532369729580225486561🍌28🔥9

13 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈13,300 views480 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Я оч люблю свои видосы смотреть. Мне кажется что после просмотра появляется дикое желание купить тачку про которую обзор. Кста сег видос будет)

286🔥81🤣59custom 532369729580225486531🤝10🍌7💅5💊1

12 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈17,200 views606 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Это вам не это😂😂😂 Буду выступать в кулинарном шоу)

🤣410custom 53236972958022548659759🔥20🍌11🤝8💊1

12 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈17,800 views881 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Слева Томуня, справа Рэмбуня

🤝568🤣15999custom 532369729580225486539💊13🍌2💔1

12 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC≈18,600 views1,434 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Мои близняшки. Слева Кисуня, справа Бубуня. Знакомьтесь)) Только что покушали👍🏻

🤣1,090197custom 532369729580225486572💊45🤝22💅7🍌1

11 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈19,900 views466 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Большинству из вас на следующую инфу будет сильнейше похуй, я это уважаю, но я должен с кем то поделиться. Никогда не считал себя лудоманом, всю эту херь со ставками которую почему то сейчас все поощряют я пропускал мимо себя. Но недавно подкинулся просто как лох последний на лавку конфет в доте. Пояснение: крутишь хуйню, тебе выпадают всякие редкие (чаще всего хуевые) предметы. Вы спросите: зачем ты донатишь в игру,

🤣267custom 53236972958022548659345💊29🤝22💅8🍌2

11 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈19,700 views1,331 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Мои близняшки. Слева Кисуня, справа Бубуня. Знакомьтесь)) Только что покушали👍🏻

1,020custom 5323697295802254865166🤣80🤝51🔥7💔3🍌2💊2

11 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈20,500 views1,007 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Реально?

🤣751🔥122custom 532369729580225486552💅45💊1611🍌7🤝3

11 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈20,800 views1,084 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Мой топ покупок на первую половину 2026: 1) принтер со сканером 2) аэрогриль 3) мультиварка 4) шляпа ковбойская 5) хонда н бокс

custom 5323697295802254865719🤣218🤝9226🔥15🍌8💅4💊2

11 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈21,900 views1,386 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Со мной в школе учился чел, он очень хорошо шарил в математике, сидел на первой парте и все такое. Очень удивительный парень, мне он запомнился тремя моментами. 1) в 5 классе он нагло спиздил у меня машинку и делал вид что не спиздил. 2) он мог стоя ровно почесать рукой коленку не наклоняясь. 3) на выпускном его так убило с литрушки Багбира что он заблевал весь танцпол. Поистине, математика - царица наук.

🤣1,080144custom 5323697295802254865111💅18🤝13🍌8🔥6💊4

11 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈22,000 views1,096 reactionsread 14 August 2026

При всем уважении, но математики конечно немножко туповаты. Ну вот существуют задачи в математике, которые невозможно решить. Или невозможно было решить до определенного момента, математические парадоксы или же гипотеза Пуанкаре и все в таком духе. Никогда не понимал в чем проблема. Человек сам придумал математику и сам не можете решить некоторые задачи, все норм у вас? Включайте голову реально. Если человек что то п

🤣792127custom 5323697295802254865104🤝44💅15💊9🍌5

10 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈22,800 views2,578 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Вот есть люди которых я никогда не пойму. Это люди которые не ставят лайки на контент человека на которого подписаны. Вот я когда подписываюсь, я везде и всегда лайки ставлю, и на истории и на посты и вообще везде. Я считаю это правильно.

custom 53236972958022548651,460🤝544273💅102💊83🤣74🍌29🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @hansontom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 916,066 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AcademeG
@academeg_true_original · 260,778
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
Дубровский Синдикат | Жекич Дубровский
@dubrovskiy_444 · 682,683
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 August 2026
Авто.ру
@carsnosleep · 496,277
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
Илья KICKDOWN 🏁
@kickdown88 · 141,392
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 August 2026
Злой Крастер
@angrycrust · 124,288
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
В гостях у Булыча
@bulkin_live · 923,326
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026
D3 | Davidich Dynamic Drive
@eric_davidich_d3 · 419,306
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
Максим Шелков
@Maxim_Shelkov · 140,574
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Том Хэнсон🍌” (@hansontom), 88,587 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hansontom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.