Ну ооооооооооооочень по мотивам. Примерно как Плевако.

Channel
Приговорчики в строю
@Prigovorchiki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,413subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001391244201 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Prigovorchiki |
| Description | Интересные уголовные дела, казусы, общественные процессы и новости. Понятно, живо, иногда желчно. Совершенно неанонимно от Натальи Шатихиной. Наша команда https://clc-spb.ru Пишите [email protected] |
| Created | 30 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Prigovorchiki |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 23,413 | +93 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 23,320 | +8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 23,312 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 23,327 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 23,335 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 23,341 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 23,339 | -22 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 23,361 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 23,371 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:29 | 23,372 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 23,374 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 23,376 | +10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 23,366 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 23,367 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 23,369 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 23,377 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 23,384 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 23,392 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 23,395 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 23,398 | first reading |
Engagement
557 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.7%
- avg views ÷ 23,413 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,740
- 121 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.73%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 121
- of 557 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 115 of 121 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 557 (4 August 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 331,816 |
| Reactions total | 5,596 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 21:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈16,400
- Videos
- ≈2,150
- Links
- ≈42,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 11m 11s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,238 reactions across 514 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 6,804 | 25.9% | |
| ❤ | 3,683 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3,681 | 14.0% | |
| 👍 | 3,184 | 12.1% | |
| 🤣 | 3,080 | 11.7% | |
| 💯 | 2,510 | 9.57% | |
| 😱 | 1,283 | 4.89% | |
| 🤨 | 432 | 1.65% | |
| 👏 | 414 | 1.58% | |
| 🤝 | 247 | 0.941% | |
| 🥰 | 206 | 0.785% | |
| 🫡 | 117 | 0.446% | |
| ❤🔥 | 108 | 0.412% | |
| 🙏 | 101 | 0.385% | |
| 🤩 | 100 | 0.381% | |
| 👌 | 56 | 0.213% | |
| 🍾 | 47 | 0.179% | |
| 🎉 | 47 | 0.179% | |
| 🐳 | 41 | 0.156% | |
| 🏆 | 40 | 0.152% | |
| 4 further kinds | 57 | 0.217% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 539 of the 557 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,083 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 557 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 15
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 10
- of 553 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 4
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Prigovorchiki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 557 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Я поняла, кого играет Исакова. Она играет Терехову, которая играет Миледи. Она, конечно, роскошная, но роль на редкость плохо сшитая.
💯1😁1
Знатоки Питера подъехали. Больше у нас домов-то нет:))) https://t.me/bponline/176097
😁19
Парень бросил. https://t.me/StalinaGurevich/12582
😁17
Ставлю как раз на психику. Иначе мы бы сейчас не пожар обсуждали. Но, естественно, Израиль скажет, дескать, Иран. https://t.me/tass_agency/398405
❤2
Очень плохо тут рассказан, но вот. Приехали пожарные на вызов тушить больницу. Ну, все сделали как и подобает настоящим героям: пожар потушили, в грязь лицом не упали. После окончания тушения командир расчета докладывает главному врачу: "Задача выполнена, возгорание ликвидировано. Правда...есть пострадавшие. Девять человек. Семерых мы откачали, а двоих, к сожалению, спасти не удалось. После этих слов главврач падает…
😁32🤣19❤4
Вспоминается один из моих любимейших анекдотов.
Американцы запустили жанр полицейско-судебной драмы прямо на очень качественных кейсах с отличными консультантами после серии чернухи на кабеле. Они умеют в пропаганду и СССР умел.
❤8👍5
Так и я про то же. И про маньяков тоже можно. И психологический триллер и детектив прекрасный можно. Где схватка, поединок и проч. Почему нет? Я как раз и говорила, что вообще-то расцвет советского детектива это конец 70-х и начало 80х. Вайнеры, Семенов… вопрос ПРО ЧТО это кино. И про предателей, и про поиск крота, и про организованную преступность… про все можно снимать на государевы деньги, не делая из этого ущербн…
💯27❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
😁24🔥12
У кого там заседания завтра в КАСе? https://t.me/fontankaspb/111586
😱18
Работа не волк. Работа - ворк.
❤85🔥35😁6😍4🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 557 posts we hold for @Prigovorchiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Prigovorchiki edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@CiGunCoach · 2022 postsBaronova
@Baronova · 6,5961 postЯРусских (Mash на Мойке)
@GoodRusskikh · 541 postMediaDeafNovorussia: новости и поддержка в Новороссии
@NewsDeafNovorussia · 281 postСердитый лоялист
@angry_loyalist · 1161 postbetter call ТИЛЛЕРТ
@bettercalltillert · 1,6851 postКниги, которые я прочитал
@bookwave · 571 postГУД`ок
@gud_ok · 3,0561 postКак дальше
@kak_dalshe · 1,1891 postКараульный Z
@karaulny · 120,1461 postПоследние мысли вслух (от Совести)
@kostisovesti · 1921 postРИТА ЭБЗЕЕВА
@mosmosru · 96,9071 postкооператив озеро
@muterracom · 221 postЕстественные науки
@naturesciences · 1,1451 postНика Стрижак
@nikastrizhak · 4,5661 postОльчик
@olga5641331 · 31 postПолина Гавердовская | структура психотерапии и всякое
@polina_gaverdovskaya · 12,1681 postСобиратор News
@sobirator · 241 postЦыпкин/Tsypkin
@tsypkintherealone · 101,6021 posttvpaleva
@tvpaleva · 211 postОбщество вменяемых
@vmenyaemy · 4441 postWinelawyers
@winelawyers · 9331 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@dranikibrut · 6,29529 posts¡лизины истории!
@lizankr_st · 59115 postsРаньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,40211 postsФонтанка SPB Online
@fontankaspb · 390,3418 postsАнонимный Молотников 🎓
@AMolotnikov2020 · 9,1077 postsРотонда
@rotondamedia · 32,5446 postsМагическая деградация
@rubberduckdebug · 2,0725 postsBaza
@bazabazon · 1,565,2933 postsbitkogan⚡️HOTLINE
@bitkogan_hotline · 83,5373 postsЛЕБЕДИНОЕ озеро
@dslebedeva_official · 7,5353 postsMash на Мойке
@mashmoyka · 342,0282 postsТруба под Неглинной
@trubapodneglinnoy · 135,3122 postsБанкротные шутейки
@BANKRO_S · 5,5811 postРУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ
@LawFirms · 21,5931 postRIA_Kremlinpool
@RIAKremlinpool · 67,9831 postSulphur and cats
@Sulphur_and_cats · 1,1541 postОтЛичный Петербург: афиша и гид Фонтанки
@afishaplus · 29,3821 post47news
@allnews47 · 45,0941 postПул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,3751 postПытливый житель
@dwellercity · 23,2831 postВ Финляндии FIN_RUS
@fin_rus · 5,0211 postЭрмитаж
@hermitage_museum · 39,0231 postResearch and Data Analysis
@hub_research · 8,6191 postНЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 504,3561 postПродюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,5251 postКоммерсантъ
@kommersant · 294,0271 postКСТАТИ
@kstati_p · 235,4181 postБабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,6981 postЛука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,2611 postMash на спорте
@mashnasporte · 84,8251 postМаксим Атаянц
@maximatayants · 4,5651 postМосква Live
@msk_live · 1,804,1581 postНеведомости
@newsroom101 · 4821 postНочной губернатор
@nightguber · 52,5101 postОбъясняем.рф
@obyasnayemrf · 285,0121 postПирожки
@pirozhki_page · 44,6201 postПолина Гавердовская | структура психотерапии и всякое
@polina_gaverdovskaya · 12,1681 postКлуб умных игр в Питере
@smartgamespiter · 5621 postСВЕЖЕСТИ
@svezhesti · 141,4011 postСвидетели и Егоры
@swideteli · 23,8591 postТАСС
@tass_agency · 567,5681 postWinelawyers
@winelawyers · 9331 postYUNA / Юния Пугачева
@yunapugacheva · 28,2371 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@yudenich · 40,22028 postsКАК-ТО ВОТ ТАК
@kaktovottak · 28,44318 postsИЗОЛЕНТА live
@izolentalive · 55,8018 postsРаньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,4024 postsПока вы спали
@pvsgns · 27,4274 postsСталина Гуревич
@StalinaGurevich · 18,1104 postsДорогая Редакция
@dorogayaredactsiya · 1,8603 postsПАРФЕНТЬЕВ.КЛУБ 🇷🇺
@parfentiev_club · 33,8603 postsИММУННЫЙ ОТВЕТ
@imotvet · 60,6292 postsКараульный Z
@karaulny · 120,1462 postsПриспособленная к жизни фея
@Prisposoblennajafeja · 22 postsWinelawyers
@winelawyers · 9332 postsАнонимный Молотников 🎓
@AMolotnikov2020 · 9,1071 post"Подсекай!" Детский рыболовно-туристический клуб
@clubpodsekai · 4001 postDaniel Grishin
@daniel_grishin · 1,3481 postИзолента Помогает!
@izolenta_help · 1081 postКрасивая политика
@krasivaya_politika · 8,1751 postРИТА ЭБЗЕЕВА
@mosmosru · 96,9071 postTynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 493,6921 postПолина Гавердовская | структура психотерапии и всякое
@polina_gaverdovskaya · 12,1681 postСарай-Берке
@sarayberke22 · 2,4821 postЦифровой ошейник
@sferum_ZLO · 4671 postВЛагерь
@vlagr · 10,3201 postЗаписки Доктора Вахляева
@zapiskidoc · 7401 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,40226 postsФонтанка SPB Online
@fontankaspb · 390,34121 postsАнонимный Молотников 🎓
@AMolotnikov2020 · 9,10714 postsТАСС
@tass_agency · 567,56813 postsБП онлайн
@bponline · 111,12012 postsВЛагерь
@vlagr · 10,32011 postsBaza
@bazabazon · 1,565,2939 postsMash
@mash · 3,110,5869 postsРотонда
@rotondamedia · 32,5448 postsСталина Гуревич
@StalinaGurevich · 18,1108 postsНика Стрижак
@nikastrizhak · 4,5666 postsКСТАТИ
@kstati_p · 235,4185 postsПул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,3754 postsMash на Мойке
@mashmoyka · 342,0284 postsНовости клики Тито
@slaboumieiotvaga1 · 7,8294 postsАнтиглянец
@sncmag · 301,6464 postsТруба под Неглинной
@trubapodneglinnoy · 135,3124 postsWinelawyers
@winelawyers · 9334 postsbitkogan⚡️HOTLINE
@bitkogan_hotline · 83,5373 postsЛентач
@lentachold · 392,4583 postsСМОЛЯК
@smolyak · 5,2603 postsОбъединённая пресс-служба судов Санкт-Петербурга
@SPbGS · 26,9473 postsВиттель. Реальность
@vitteli · 15,9453 postsМарина Юденич
@yudenich · 40,2202 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@gillshem · 38,776#1
@prbezposhady · 151,691#2
@vlagr · 10,320#3
@imerkouri · 58,752#4
@mashmoyka · 342,028#5
@verysexydasha · 79,171#6
@orda_mordora · 163,622#7
@dslebedeva_official · 7,535#8
@bponline · 111,120#9
@oper_goblin · 493,692#10
@dranikibrut · 6,295#11
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402#12
@mash · 3,110,586#13
@tsypkintherealone · 101,602#14
@JuliaMenshovaJulia · 358,222#15
@luka_ebkov · 431,261#16
@bloodysx · 1,178,521#17
@ejdailyru · 671,042#18
@boris_rozhin · 747,495#19
@bazabazon · 1,565,293#20
@slaboumieiotvaga1 · 7,829#21
@cognitive_life · 119,034#22
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,375#23
@asupersharij · 1,712,089#24
@auantonov · 321,690#25
@imnotbozhena · 504,356#26
@readovkanews · 2,014,901#27
@banksta · 438,371#28
@infantmilitario · 277,422#29
@bomber_fighter · 527,032#30
@temalebedev · 970,618#31
@mig41 · 480,262#32
@botcharov · 210,279#33
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630#34
@strelets_molodec · 354,527#35
@pvsgns · 27,427#36
@insect_life · 192,224#37
@minaevlife · 318,588#38
@izolentalive · 55,801#39
@su2050 · 81,037#40
@sncmag · 301,646#41
@solovievlive · 1,116,748#42
@fontankaspb · 390,341#43
@StalinaGurevich · 18,110#44
@expensive_hurma · 151,300#45
@tass_agency · 567,568#46
@shitandsable · 18,219#47
@rbc_news · 916,636#48
@russicaru · 429,017#49
@shot_shot · 1,265,657#50
@vysokygovorit · 491,085#51
@karaulny · 120,146#52
@sashakon · 131,696#53
@alesiapetrovna · 140,033#54
@vitteli · 15,945#55
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 452,487#56
@sashakots · 473,335#57
@a_kuzichev · 85,177#58
@kashinguru · 75,327#59
@rezident_ua · 920,149#60
@maximatayants · 4,565#61
@prchand · 84,253#62
@medvedev_telegram · 1,696,520#63
@fuckyouthatswhy · 24,091#64
@nikastrizhak · 4,566#65
@golosmordora1 · 148,784#66
@ASGasparyan · 174,806#67
@istrkalkglk · 122,414#68
@obrazbuduschego2 · 165,018#69
@zakharprilepin · 224,352#70
@kommersant · 294,027#71
@savanichi · 194,186#72
@FridrihShow · 66,845#73
@LawFirms · 21,593#74
@legitimniy · 1,041,345#75
@margaritasimonyan · 510,816#76
@pavelostrovski · 230,978#77
@iikhu · 154,817#78
@im_not_aprincess · 50,148#79
@dimonundmir · 206,991#80
@khazinml · 243,844#81
@vmarahovsky · 60,724#82
@klimzhukoff · 138,297#83
@wargonzo · 743,058#84
@voenkorKotenok · 312,383#85
@Marinaslovo · 98,576#86
@sladkov_plus · 702,738#87
@smolyak · 5,260#88
@burrowingowl · 7,278#89
@politjoystic · 250,589#90
@kozakrichala · 181,120#91
@spletni_tg · 187,952#92
@kureelka · 124,698#93
@NeSocSeti · 26,073#94
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@gillshem · 38,776
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@pirozhki_page · 44,620
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@cognitive_life · 119,034
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@izolentalive · 55,801
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
@tsypkintherealone · 101,602
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@SPbGS · 26,947
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
@pvsgns · 27,427
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
@kitchen_chef · 84,128
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@JuliaMenshovaJulia · 358,222
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@NeSocSeti · 26,073
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
@a_kuzichev · 85,177
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@koro4eDON · 25,987
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Приговорчики в строю” (@Prigovorchiki), 23,413 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Prigovorchiki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.