Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Виттель. Реальность

@vitteli

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

15,908subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001392939599
TypeChannel
Username@vitteli
DescriptionИгорь Виттель об экономике, политике, королях и капусте. Для обратной связи бот: @dolboeboff_bot Отблагодарить автора канала можно здесь: https://pay.cloudtips.ru/p/2239dd71
Created16 February 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vitteli

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Виттель.Реальность — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

15,90315,90915,9065 August 2026 — 15,905 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,905 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,904 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,907 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,909 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,905 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,903 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,908 subscribers15,9085 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,902–15,910 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:2215,908+5
11 Aug 2026, 07:3115,903-2
9 Aug 2026, 12:0315,905-4
8 Aug 2026, 12:3215,909+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:0215,907+3
6 Aug 2026, 15:3015,904-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:1915,905no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:1015,905first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.7%
avg views ÷ 15,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,800
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held33 (14 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total224,300
Reactions total3,202
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
966
Videos
111
Links
1,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,866 reactions across 29 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,866100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 33 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vitteli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,490 views87 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Однажды утром Мальчиш-Плохиш поднимет веки и поймёт, что ему больше не хочется ни варенья, ни печенья. Это и будет конец.

👍87

10 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈2,990 views92 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Логично. https://t.me/whackdoor/30438

👍92

10 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈3,120 views73 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Черт догадал меня родиться в коробке у Шредингера, да еще ни живым ни мертвым. Из писем кота Шредингера Наталье Николаевне.

👍73

10 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈4,320 views71 reactionsread 13 August 2026

«Можете ли вы сказать нам, европейцам, что конкретно мы можем сделать, чтобы помочь вам убить больше русских? Конечно же, больше русских солдат». Михаэль Мартенс - Европейский корреспондент Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ). Внук прокурора и офицера штаба руководства вермахта. «Перед поездкой во Вроцлав я решил не участвовать в каких-либо политических дискуссиях об Израиле, если таковые состоятся. Будучи немцем

👍71

8 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC≈4,390 views164 reactionsread 13 August 2026

В квартиру господина Эгге, который научился говорить нет, пришел однажды во времена беззакония агент и показал удостоверение, выданное от имени тех, кто правил городом. В удостоверении писалось, что агенту должна принадлежать каждая квартира, в которую он придёт; также и всякая еда, которую он потребует; также и всякий, кого он увидит, должен служить ему. Агент сел на стул, потребовал еду, помылся, лёг, отвернулся ли

👍164

8 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC≈4,020 views152 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Я вот что думаю, а вдруг все окажется правдой, и не зря мы в нашей юности телефон подушкой накрывали и, диск провернув, карандашом фиксировали? Вдруг Товарищ Майор действительно всех писал, ну ладно, не всех, но нас-то точно, а значит и всех родных наших. Так значит и разговоры бабушки с подругами писал? А вдруг это у Товарища Майора все сохранилось? Ну или даже оцифровано, подписано и пронумеровано. Мне ведь там с

👍152

8 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈3,970 views83 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Кроме того, президент Сербии сообщил, что Белград сделает всё возможное, чтобы помочь Украине как можно скорее продвинуться по пути вступления в Евросоюз. Это как? Уступит место?

👍83

8 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈4,260 views127 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Не знаю, что там за партия "Новые люди", но партию "Старые нелюди" я ещё под позапрошлые выборы в Госдуму создал.

👍127

8 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈5,470 views80 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Долго обнимались, целовались, пока...

👍80

6 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈5,350 views202 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Картинку про меня прислали.

👍202

6 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈4,960 views59 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Добрый день! Мы - Свидетели Котиков. Вы не хотели бы поговорить про Человека Нашего и Кошку?

👍59

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @vitteli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 82,594 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q4112481 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelIgor Vittel
DescriptionRussian journalist
Official sitehttp://vittel.tv/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виттель. Реальность” (@vitteli), 15,908 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitteli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.