Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Андрей Васильев

@foxymandrei

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,178subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004471990203
TypeChannel
Username@foxymandrei
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/foxymandrei

Growth

1,1781,1961,1876 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,175–1,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:211,178-13
7 Aug 2026, 01:401,191-5
6 Aug 2026, 08:481,196no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:471,196first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.72%
avg views ÷ 1,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.2
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,425
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈50 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как видят меня мои подписчики, когда я ем дороже чем за 27 рублей

5 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC≈61 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Путин же сказал, гейские методы денежно-кредитной политики Россия использовать не будет.

5 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈63 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вернемся к лайфстайл основам • Cappuccino • MAI • Maracuja Yoghurt 9,70 EUR Düsseldorf, Rath

5 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC≈62 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Дайте мне телеграмм канал с 500к подписчиков, и завтра все будут жрать говно. Хотя все уже и так 😊

5 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈60 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если вы подумаете от этой точки на два шага вперед, вы поймете, что стало с украинцами. Если вы сможете сделать три шага вперед, вы поймете, что стало с гражданами РФ. Если вы умеете думать о прошлом, с 1933 года, вы поймёте, что стало с немцами.

4 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈71 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вы вообще слышите, о чем я вам говорю? Если для меня она 6,5/10, но мои друзья говорят, 10/10, то моя обезьяна заставляет меня думать, что она реально 10/10. И наоборот. Если девушка видит, что у меня есть подруги, что её подруги/родители меня хвалят, что я социально одобряем, я занимаю должность, статус, деньги, что я выиграл олимпиаду Медвежонок — я ей начинаю нравиться, даже если я объективно 5/10. После этой

4 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈71 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мы — тупые обезьяны? Факт, ставший мне известный лет в 13, но по каким-то причинам до сих пор неизвестный многим взрослым людям. Решил посмотреть интервью с Кримсоном, который предложил ознакомиться с соответствующим научным исследованием. Краткие выводы: Мы сильно переоцениваем независимость собственного мышления. На практике наш мозг остаётся мозгом примата, который миллионы лет выживал не благодаря истине, а

4 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈77 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sashakon

внимание: после выборов ВЫЕБУТ сразу ВСЕХ.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @foxymandrei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 599,078 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андрей Васильев” (@foxymandrei), 1,178 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxymandrei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.