Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Фрольченков

@fro1ch

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40,283subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001300694781
TypeChannel
Username@fro1ch
DescriptionОдин из самых знаменитых SMM в РФ. Эксперт по поведению человека в социальных сетях, международный спикер. Добро пожаловать на мой личный канал, где я пишу о жизни, поведении людей, и шучу. По всем вопросам @rosies213 РКН: https://clck.ru/3GYcHT 18+
Created24 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fro1ch

Growth

40,23840,43040,3346 August 2026 — 40,238 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,272 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,430 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,373 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,411 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,316 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,246 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,283 subscribers40,2836 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,209–40,459 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:4440,283+37
11 Aug 2026, 20:2840,246-70
10 Aug 2026, 19:1240,316-95
9 Aug 2026, 19:0140,411+38
8 Aug 2026, 20:3840,373-57
7 Aug 2026, 20:1940,430+158
6 Aug 2026, 21:5640,272+34
6 Aug 2026, 05:3340,238first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 40,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,520
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held15 (17 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total82,740
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,740
Videos
1,100
Links
2,350

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fro1ch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈3,620 viewsread 12 August 2026

Слуште, кто записывает подкасты или лекции, вы же знаете эту боль. Ты выдал крутой часовой материал, прям на кураже и вайбе, всё по полочкам разложил. А потом приходит время тайм-кодов. И ты сидишь, пересматриваешь свой же ролик в сотый раз, высматриваешь циферки, вбиваешь названия глав, которые уже успел забыть. Это прям верный способ выгореть быстрее, чем успеешь запостить. Но случилось чудо! В VK Видео завезли ав

10 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈4,410 viewsread 12 August 2026

Всем доброго утра понедельника и хорошей трудовой недели. 🕊

7 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈4,670 viewsread 12 August 2026

Про воспитание, государство, тиктоки и Мию Бойко Я не верю в воспитание. Правда. Не в том смысле, что его не существует, а в том, что слова родителя – это просто шум. В одно ухо влетело – в другое вылетело. Ребёнок не слушает, что ты говоришь. Он смотрит, что ты делаешь. На твои поступки. Если ты постоянно втыкаешь в ТикТок, харкаешь на асфальт, в твоей тачке орёт попса, а разговоры только про бабки, то не удивляйс

6 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC≈5,040 views0 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Про «пир по время чумы» Как же меня бесит позиция: «Как можно веселиться, когда в мире столько боли?». Блять, вы серьёзно? А что мне делать? Пойти на площадь и рыдать? Застрелиться от безысходности? Или просто сидеть и думскроллить новости, пока голова не взорвётся к хуям? Я вот реально не понимаю этой логики. Да, в мире происходит хуета. Войны, кризисы, эпидемии, и т.п. Но жизнь продолжается, блять! Люди рождаются

3 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈5,300 viewsread 12 August 2026

Всем доброго утра понедельника и хорошей трудовой недели. 🕊

1 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC≈5,720 viewsread 12 August 2026

Про «проёбаное» и счастливое лето Сегодня 1 августа. А это значит, что большая часть лета уже позади. По сложившейся ежегодной традиции, я часто слышу нытьё, типа «ой как быстро пролетело лето, 2 месяца впустую/проебали, как же так». И вот что здесь происходит? Невроз здесь происходит. Стремление делить свою жизнь на отрезки, которые якобы были впустую/проебаны без какой-либо пользы и на то, что якобы должно нести

31 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC≈6,110 viewsread 12 August 2026

7 золотых вещей, которые я понял с возрастом: 1. Ты перерастаешь дружбы, независимо от того, какими близкими бы они не были; 2. Ты – своё самое длительное обязательство и самая главная ответственность; 3. Тебя не будут награждать за усилия, только за результаты; 4. Ты столкнешься с разбитыми сердцами и неудачами – прими это; 5. Семья и близкие имеют наибольшее значение в жизни; 6. Ты не можешь изменить прошлое, так

29 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC≈2,190 views0 reactions52 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В этом году я снова гонял на Студвесну, чтобы прочитать лекцию для студентов и посидеть в жюри в направлении «Медиа». Как и в прошлый раз я был очень рад, что меня пригласили, и я снова был удивлён. Вокруг море красивой, талантливой и безумно заряженной молодежи. И они не просто крутые, они реально что-то создают: поют, танцуют, играют, снимают, придумывают. На это невозможно смотреть без улыбки до ушей, потому что

27 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC≈6,170 viewsread 12 August 2026

Всем доброго утра понедельника и хорошей трудовой недели. 🕊

26 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC≈6,460 viewsread 12 August 2026

Уже достаточно долго я переживаю экзистенциальный кризис. Это когда по-старому не хочется, а по-новому не знаешь как. И ты просто живёшь и охуеваешь. То пиздец штормит, то прям накатывает. Этому способствует кризис среднего возраста (скоро моё сорокалетие), непонятки с работой, неопределённость в завтрашнем дне, разочарование в современном обществе, мировая геополитическая обстановка, да и в целом понимание ради че

23 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC≈6,510 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Отличное (только голос противный) отрезвляющее видео. Распространите!

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fro1ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 217,451 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фрольченков” (@fro1ch), 40,283 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fro1ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.