Слуште, кто записывает подкасты или лекции, вы же знаете эту боль. Ты выдал крутой часовой материал, прям на кураже и вайбе, всё по полочкам разложил. А потом приходит время тайм-кодов. И ты сидишь, пересматриваешь свой же ролик в сотый раз, высматриваешь циферки, вбиваешь названия глав, которые уже успел забыть. Это прям верный способ выгореть быстрее, чем успеешь запостить. Но случилось чудо! В VK Видео завезли ав…

Channel
Фрольченков
@fro1ch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40,283subscribers
+45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001300694781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fro1ch |
| Description | Один из самых знаменитых SMM в РФ. Эксперт по поведению человека в социальных сетях, международный спикер. Добро пожаловать на мой личный канал, где я пишу о жизни, поведении людей, и шучу. По всем вопросам @rosies213 РКН: https://clck.ru/3GYcHT 18+ |
| Created | 24 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fro1ch |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 40,283 | +37 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 40,246 | -70 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 40,316 | -95 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 40,411 | +38 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 40,373 | -57 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 40,430 | +158 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 40,272 | +34 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 40,238 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.7%
- avg views ÷ 40,283 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,520
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (17 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 82,740 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,740
- Videos
- ≈1,100
- Links
- ≈2,350
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 48s
- Average length
- 48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 55
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 52
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fro1ch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Всем доброго утра понедельника и хорошей трудовой недели. 🕊
Про воспитание, государство, тиктоки и Мию Бойко Я не верю в воспитание. Правда. Не в том смысле, что его не существует, а в том, что слова родителя – это просто шум. В одно ухо влетело – в другое вылетело. Ребёнок не слушает, что ты говоришь. Он смотрит, что ты делаешь. На твои поступки. Если ты постоянно втыкаешь в ТикТок, харкаешь на асфальт, в твоей тачке орёт попса, а разговоры только про бабки, то не удивляйс…
Про «пир по время чумы» Как же меня бесит позиция: «Как можно веселиться, когда в мире столько боли?». Блять, вы серьёзно? А что мне делать? Пойти на площадь и рыдать? Застрелиться от безысходности? Или просто сидеть и думскроллить новости, пока голова не взорвётся к хуям? Я вот реально не понимаю этой логики. Да, в мире происходит хуета. Войны, кризисы, эпидемии, и т.п. Но жизнь продолжается, блять! Люди рождаются…
Всем доброго утра понедельника и хорошей трудовой недели. 🕊
Про «проёбаное» и счастливое лето Сегодня 1 августа. А это значит, что большая часть лета уже позади. По сложившейся ежегодной традиции, я часто слышу нытьё, типа «ой как быстро пролетело лето, 2 месяца впустую/проебали, как же так». И вот что здесь происходит? Невроз здесь происходит. Стремление делить свою жизнь на отрезки, которые якобы были впустую/проебаны без какой-либо пользы и на то, что якобы должно нести …
7 золотых вещей, которые я понял с возрастом: 1. Ты перерастаешь дружбы, независимо от того, какими близкими бы они не были; 2. Ты – своё самое длительное обязательство и самая главная ответственность; 3. Тебя не будут награждать за усилия, только за результаты; 4. Ты столкнешься с разбитыми сердцами и неудачами – прими это; 5. Семья и близкие имеют наибольшее значение в жизни; 6. Ты не можешь изменить прошлое, так …
В этом году я снова гонял на Студвесну, чтобы прочитать лекцию для студентов и посидеть в жюри в направлении «Медиа». Как и в прошлый раз я был очень рад, что меня пригласили, и я снова был удивлён. Вокруг море красивой, талантливой и безумно заряженной молодежи. И они не просто крутые, они реально что-то создают: поют, танцуют, играют, снимают, придумывают. На это невозможно смотреть без улыбки до ушей, потому что …
Ну и в чём он не прав?
Всем доброго утра понедельника и хорошей трудовой недели. 🕊
Уже достаточно долго я переживаю экзистенциальный кризис. Это когда по-старому не хочется, а по-новому не знаешь как. И ты просто живёшь и охуеваешь. То пиздец штормит, то прям накатывает. Этому способствует кризис среднего возраста (скоро моё сорокалетие), непонятки с работой, неопределённость в завтрашнем дне, разочарование в современном обществе, мировая геополитическая обстановка, да и в целом понимание ради че…
Отличное (только голос противный) отрезвляющее видео. Распространите!
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fro1ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 217,451 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фрольченков” (@fro1ch), 40,283 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fro1ch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.