Channel
@baronofchita
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,059subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001675286263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baronofchita |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baronofchita |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 1,059 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 1,061 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,063 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 1,063 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
273 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 144 | 52.7% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 17.6% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 5.86% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 4.40% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 3.66% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 3.30% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 2.93% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 2.56% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.47% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 1.10% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.733% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.733% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.733% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.366% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.366% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.366% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.366% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.366% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.366% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2024 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Rap fatigue is real. Not just in the sense that, if you’re into it, you’re probably aware it is incredibly stale, but if you’re not, you’ve become fatigued with hearing it everywhere. Might be related to other forms of fatigue, but we all feel it. 🤌🏿✋🏻😒
🤔3❤2💯2💔1
There is no evidence, none, zero that “32,000” or whatever insane number people are parroting were killed during protests in Iran. Republicans are the most mentally disabled voters in America.
👍23👎2🤡1
❗️Russia liberates the St. Michael's Church in the centre of Pokrovsk. ✅The church is almost unscathed having survived the battle with only very minor cosmetic damage. 👏Well done to both sides for exercising caution and not destroying the church. ☦Note: St Michael's in Pokrovsk has always been under the jurisdiction of the canonical UOC MP. @AussieCossack
🙏9❤6👍1🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
😁8
What the fuck is going on with YouTube on mobile devices now? I search something and I am assaulted with ‘shorts’. No actual videos and I’ve scrolled endlessly. This is horrendous. Society has collapsed.
👍17❤4
A peace that leads to a more difficult war years from now is no peace at all.
👍14❤4
One year ago, the Ukrainian army began its incursion into Kursk oblast. It's initial objective was extremely audacious: they wanted to rush towards the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant, capture it and take it hostage. I think they themselves understood that this mission had very low chances of success, but why not try. It failed, of course. Their second objective was to capture and hold as much territory as possible, to u…
❤5👍2
Kim Jong Un opens up a North Korean resort town, preparing to welcome Russian tourists. Absolutely loving the corny early-Youtube era soundtrack too. Might check it out next summer. Let the good times roll!
❤9
Imposing 500% tariffs on nations that trade with Russia will backfire - Senator Rand Paul - Responsible Statecraft While tariffs make wars more likely, embargoes make wars difficult to avoid. Senator Graham’s Sanctioning Russia Act calls for 500% tariffs on dozens of countries and essentially amounts to an embargo. If this bill were to pass, it would cause an economic calamity on a scale never before seen in our co…
👍5❤1
We just made our Stolypin episode FREE for everyone. Almost 2.5 hours, one of our longest and best historical episodes ever. Still really proud of that one.
👍3
Russian military lifts fallen Orthodox cross in Kursk region The fallen cross was found on the outskirts of the village of Sverdlikovo. Since the structure is quite large and heavy, it took five soldiers of the Russian Armed Forces to lift it. The Russian Ministry of Defense reported yesterday that the village of Sverdlikovo in the Kursk region had been liberated. @Slavyangrad
❤14🙏4🔥2
Sorry to say I am going to be on a tirade for a while RE Islam. It's a matter of principle for me. The evil perpetrated by the Sunni Arabs and the Turks is something I believe every Christian has a duty to speak out against. I take that seriously.
👍28🫡6👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @baronofchita. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BaronT” (@baronofchita), 1,059 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baronofchita.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.