Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rick Woodcock

Channel

Rick Woodcock

@rickwoodcock

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001938211057
TypeChannel
Username@rickwoodcock
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rickwoodcock

Growth

454.57 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:454-1
13 Aug 2026, 03:035no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:495first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.0%
avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (18 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total1
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 17s
Average length
1m 26s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

“PSA about Pfizer” https://patriots.win/p/1ATC9SAN4G/psa-about-pfizer/c https://x.com/ValerieAnne1970/status/2085350182837768377

19 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC2 viewsread 13 August 2026

RFK Jr: "The Pandemics are coming from labs. ALL OF THEM... Lyme, COVID, RSV, HIV & Spanish Flu came out of a vaccine lab." https://x.com/ValerieAnne1970/status/2078510108720378170 https://patriots.win/p/1ATBvN1gOm/rfk-jr-the-pandemics-are-coming-/c

13 Jun 2026, 17:46 UTC2 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestinePhoto

Why were Fauci and Hunter pardoned for all crimes that they may have committed, starting January 1, 2014? That’s coincidentally during the Maidan Coup, and just before Obama had Fauci offshore US gain of function research to Ukraine, and just before Hunter’s Metabiota received a USAID contract to look for, and conduct gain of function research on, bat coronaviruses in Ukraine, via USAID Project PREDICT. Immediately

13 Jun 2026, 17:45 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestinePhoto

Ask your favorite AI who is responsible for the US biolabs in Ukraine story, and they will tell you it was me. Am I the first person to talk about this subject? No. The Russian Military were the first, and this subject was talked about in Russia/China years before it reached any real traction in the West. I’m just the one that made it go viral in English-speaking countries and the Western Hemisphere, and I’m the on

13 Jun 2026, 17:44 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestineVideo

Video, posted without a caption

13 Jun 2026, 17:44 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestine

I see the Left-wing/Ukrainian bots got their talking points. They went from “the labs don’t exist”, to “okay the labs exist but they were doing defensive research”. “Defensive research” is a lie. In the process of defensive research, you create a bioweapon. I’ll explain. Defensive zoonotic research, is when scientists intentionally make animal viruses transmissible in humans, so they can study the virus and proact

13 Jun 2026, 17:44 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestine

The reason the Biden admin, the Intelligence community, the global MSM, etc., smeared me and covered up the US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, is because this trail leads to who created COVID. They panicked for a reason. Crimes against humanity.

13 Jun 2026, 17:43 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestinePhoto

People forget just how insane the “fact-checkers” and MSM were during all this. They gaslit the world and blatantly lied about the existence of US-funded labs in Ukraine, and claimed I was spreading “Russian disinformation”. USA Today STILL has not corrected this.

13 Jun 2026, 17:43 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestinePhoto

Here’s the new information from DNI. They admit that the US built and fund/support, over 40 labs in Ukraine, which house dangerous pathogens, which Russia claim are being used for bioweapon development. They are kind of admitting Putin and Russian MIL were right, to a degree. To me, I think this is the beginning stages of public disclosure about Covid being a US-funded experiment, and it very well may lead back to

13 Jun 2026, 17:42 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestineVideo

🔥BREAKING NEWS🔥 DNI Gabbard is releasing new evidence about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, and calls out the Biden administration and complicit media for covering all of this up and attacking/threatening those who tried to expose this, aka, ME! The highest ranking US intelligence official just confirmed that the entire system went out of their way to cover up US-funded biolabs around the world. In other words, Tuls

13 Jun 2026, 17:41 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026

https://patriots.win/p/1ASsrxNN8L/dni-tulsi-gabbard-today-im-relea/c

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rickwoodcock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rick Woodcock” (@rickwoodcock), 4 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rickwoodcock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.