Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1,194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 300,845–302,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:54
301,024
-211
11 Aug 2026, 22:55
301,235
-204
10 Aug 2026, 20:13
301,439
-190
9 Aug 2026, 18:44
301,629
-206
8 Aug 2026, 15:15
301,835
-133
7 Aug 2026, 15:37
301,968
-146
6 Aug 2026, 18:10
302,114
-104
6 Aug 2026, 01:30
302,218
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:56
302,218
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.99%
avg views ÷ 301,024 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,000
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.959%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
62 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
930,520
Reactions total
8,923
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,050
Videos
≈3,590
Links
≈3,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 58m
Average length
5m 09s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,333 reactions across 59 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
2,794
33.5%
🔥
1,162
13.9%
👍
1,105
13.3%
😢
1,015
12.2%
❤
997
12.0%
😁
816
9.79%
🍓
210
2.52%
🤯
185
2.22%
🐳
49
0.588%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,923reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.61%
1 of 62 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
13,100
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
15,500
over 61 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjchdae7
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
ИИ-агенты уже сами взламывают государства — специалисты Dream разобрали мощную атаку на правительственную сеть Тайваня от китайских ИИ-хакеров.
За четыре дня система провела 12 волн атак: до восьми агентов одновременно исследовали 21 госсистему, искали уязвимости и самостоятельно меняли тактику при неудаче. В результате были взломаны 85 аккаунтов, украдены более 2500 кадровых записей, учётные данные и схема сети. З…
⚡️ Alibaba ОТКРЫЛИ ВЕСА своего монстра на 2,4 трлн параметров — Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B уже лежит на Hugging Face.
Внутри контекст до 1 млн токенов, 95 млрд активных параметров и параллельный вызов инструментов. Но самое интересное, конечно, автономность: модель может кодить без присмотра больше 10 дней.
Причем по бенчмаркам Qwen уже местами обходит топовые закрытые модели.
Ждем ответочку от западных моделей 😳
@xor_jou…
К новому учебному году детская СберКарта обновилась. Что нового:
— Кешбэк 50% на школьные товары
— Три новых дизайна. Зелёный, розовый и чёрный с мемными пасхалками six-seven
— Копилка для реализации мечт ребёнка, со ставкой 10%
И ещё один полезный апдейт: в разделе «Для жизни» в СберБанк Онлайн появились специальные акции к началу учебного года. Там собрали предложения для подготовки к школе — от полезных покупок …
Решаем проблему с TLS-сертификатами и сайтами российских банков — нейронка объяснила, как не потерять доступ к отечественному онлайн-банкингу.
Можно самостоятельно добавить сертификаты Минцифры в браузер, но есть вариант попроще — использовать Яндекс Браузер, где нужная поддержка уже работает из коробки.
А вот закрывать глаза на предупреждения Chrome или Safari — плохая идея. Особенно если сайт просит пароль, данны…
Шоу Трумена с нейросетями: заботливый отец собрал сыну Roblox БЕЗ НЕЗНАКОМЦЕВ — инди-разработчик Адам Литтл сделал браузерную игру Spellingworlds, где нет живых игроков 😣
Внутри — уровни с полосами препятствий, по которым бегут записи чужих прохождений: кажется, будто играешь с людьми, хотя никто посторонний к ребёнку не подключается. В чате сидят боты, отвечающие через ChatGPT, а для прохождения нужно собирать букв…
Spotify перестанет подсовывать ИИ-музыкантов — сервис вводит специальную метку AI Persona и убирает виртуальных исполнителей из рекомендаций.
С середины сентября плашка появится в профиле, поиске и рядом с треками в плейлистах. По умолчанию такие артисты исчезнут как из редакционных подборок, так и из алгоритмических рекомендаций — но слушать их по-прежнему можно, а подписка вернёт их в персональную выдачу.
Это поб…
В Яндекс Книгах появился люмен — он помогает разобраться, кто есть кто в сюжетах книг.
Это уже вторая фича в арсенале эмпатичных ИИ-питомцев — первой была Моя волна по промту в Яндекс Музыке. Разница в том, что там люмен подстраивает запрос юзера под алгоритмы стриминга, а в читалке становится личным проводником по сюжету. Люмен фиксирует, до какого места вы дочитали или дослушали книгу, и выдает сводку строго по пр…
👍36🤣33❤5🔥3😁3😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @neuraldvig. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 7,246 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Технологии | Нейросети | Боты @aiaiai · 177,822 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
ChatGPT | Нейросети @gptpublic · 273,329 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Рестарт @remedia · 731,471 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
CodeCamp @codecamp · 183,044 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Бэкдор @whackdoor · 1,652,003 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Движитал @dvizhitall · 519,117 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 9 August 2026
Не баг, а фича @bugfeature · 593,848 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
concertzaal @concertzaal · 839,414 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
Трендач @trendach · 1,492,505 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
TrendWatching @trendwatching24 · 1,473,361 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
таскам время, потехе час @poteha_time · 440,785 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Код.ру @d_code · 381,695 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
ТЕХНО: Яндекс про технологии @techno_yandex · 233,428 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Яндекс @yandex · 549,172 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 August 2026
1337 @media1337 · 1,186,864 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
Техномотель @technomotel · 2,636,502 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 August 2026
GigaChat @official_gigachat · 311,329 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
XOR @xor_journal · 158,696 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
в IT и выйти @techmedia · 1,347,028 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Цифровой Журнал | IT, Neiroseti @chatgptv · 1,895,790 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Джейпег Малевича @malepeg · 564,431 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 August 2026
Rozetked @rozetked · 667,070 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
Провод @provod · 1,450,300 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Naked Science @nsmag · 193,883 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нейродвиж” (@neuraldvig), 301,024 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuraldvig.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
