Пишем код, тюним рекомендации, чистим вёрстку, делаем ВКонтакте, ОК, Дзен, Почту, VK Play и ещё более 200 проектов.
• Технологии
• Дропы вакансий
• Бэкстейджи проектов
• Мемы и общение
Вступить в клуб: vk.cc/vacancy
Реестр РКН: vk.cc/cIuwAn
#PHEXV
Created
1 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,626–25,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:05
25,652
-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:06
25,654
+21
11 Aug 2026, 08:13
25,633
-1
10 Aug 2026, 06:17
25,634
+4
8 Aug 2026, 09:32
25,630
-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:13
25,632
-4
6 Aug 2026, 10:01
25,636
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:54
25,636
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.96%
avg views ÷ 25,652 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
11 (15 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
22,451
Reactions total
473
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,090
Videos
≈211
Links
≈1,110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 34s
Average length
1m 31s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
473 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
164
34.7%
🔥
123
26.0%
👍
71
15.0%
🗿
62
13.1%
🤣
31
6.55%
🥰
9
1.90%
👏
5
1.06%
🤩
5
1.06%
👨💻
1
0.211%
😁
1
0.211%
😎
1
0.211%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 473reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 11 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vkjobs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Этот митап пройдёт со вкусом соуса барбекю и сильных докладов 🍖
Встречаемся 26 августа в Санкт-Петербурге на мероприятии для Go- и Java-разработчиков. В меню — доклады, квизы, афтепати и, конечно, шашлычок!
Рецепт нашего вечера:
• Начнём с разогрева — послушаем вступительный доклад Алексея Волкова про непрерывное облачное профилирование
• Выберем трек: Go или Java
• Добавим перчинку: после докладов сыграем в техкви…
🔥 Product Fest 2026: рецепт макроспринта от ВКонтакте
На недавнем фестивале для продактов руководитель направления «Контентные сервисы» ВКонтакте Никита Лебедев рассказал о том, как менять зрелый продукт и что помогает быстрее двигать сложные изменения.
Один из инструментов — макроспринты. На ограниченный период команды разных направлений объединяются вокруг общей цели, фиксируют критерии успеха и регулярно сверяют…
В хорошем августе должно быть две вещи: спелый арбуз и подборка полезных постов от коллег 🍉
Собрали самые интересные публикации в стековых каналах. Выбирайте, что почитать прямо сейчас, или сохраняйте пост, чтобы вернуться к нему позже. Подписывайтесь на каналы коллег и будьте в курсе новых разборов и статей.
🔹 Mobile VK Hub
VK переехала с XML на Jetpack Compose
Как команда за полтора года мигрировала на Compose, …
🎮 Куда сходить в августе: наша подборка для инженеров (и не только)
Три события, три фокуса: продукт, данные и языки программирования.
Наши разработчики, архитекторы и продакт-менеджеры собрали интересные кейсы, подготовили собственные ивенты и ждут встречи.
Смотрите программу и выбирайте своё событие ↓
🎤 IT-Пикник — 8 августа, Коломенское
Чему нас учат розовые очки Антропика — 15:30
О чём поговорим
Дмитрий Мерк…
Спор о том, войдёт ли ИИ в будни разработчиков, закончен — это уже произошло
Вместе с JUG Ru Group мы опросили более 700 специалистов и узнали, как они используют ИИ в работе. Спойлер: 95% уже обращаются к нему, каждый второй — ежедневно. Чаще всего — чтобы найти информацию, написать или проверить код и сгенерировать тесты.
При этом опенсорс становится менее популярным: 70% опрошенных не участвуют в проектах с откр…
Жёсткость, контроль, результат любой ценой — раньше это считалось нормой лидерства. Теперь такая модель управления не работает на длинной дистанции.
В новой статье на Дзене разбираем, почему:
✍️современное лидерство выходит за пределы «мужских» и «женских» качеств
✍️ лидеру необязательно быть самым умным в комнате
✍️ эмпатия не просто мягкий навык, а важнейший инструмент управления
✍️ умение восстанавливаться станов…
Тотальный багфикс
Заглянули в соседние продукты и пофиксили сотни багов за три дня — так прошёл большой кросс-продуктовый Фиксатон VK.
Когда баг никак не поддаётся, на помощь приходят коллеги — их свежий взгляд и опыт помогают нащупать нужный вектор. На Фиксатоне 101 команда инженеров рассмотрела под микроскопом баги в 12 продуктах VK. 420 решений мы уже выкатили в прод.
А ещё у нашего Фиксатона появилась собствен…
Хорошие рекомендации — это не удача. Это инженерия 😉
За тем, чтобы в ленте, поиске и рекомендациях находилось именно то, что вам нужно, стоят сотни инженерных решений. О них и говорили на первом RecSys Meetup от AI VK.
Как меняется наша Discovery-платформа? Что происходит под капотом нейропоиска? Почему команда AI VK всё больше напоминает настоящий НИИ? И куда движется будущее рекомендательных систем?
Ответом на п…
«Давайте ещё немного поднажмём»
Звучит вдохновляюще… если не слышишь эту фразу третий квартал подряд 🙃
Запуск важного проекта часто требует максимальной отдачи. Может показаться, что команда способна действовать так каждый день, но это неправда.
В новой статье Нина Андреянова из ВКонтакте разбирает пять управленческих ошибок, которые незаметно снижают эффективность команды, и объясняет, почему высокий перформанс и…
Хотите, чтобы вас узнавали в профессиональном сообществе?
Вместе с Ксенией Губаненковой, руководителем группы по работе с IT-сообществом VK, подготовили гайд: зачем разработчику нужен личный бренд и как его развивать. Все подробности — в карусели.
Сохраняйте гайд и прокачивайте свою узнаваемость в профессии!
Знаете клёвые места? А мы их создаём!
Мы снова сделали коллаборацию с South HUB — кемпом для C-level руководителей в IT. В этом году рассказали о нашей Discovery-платформе и провели дискуссию о легаси. А ещё пригласили участников на тематическую виллу Дом рыбака, где рассказали об инженерной культуре VK.
Команда нашего уютного дома встретила 500 гостей и провела 16 полезных активностей. Вместе мы разобрали управлен…
❤18👍11🔥10😁1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @vkjobs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 220,325 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Карьера в Сбере! @careersber · 137,196 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VK Team” (@vkjobs), 25,652 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vkjobs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.