Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Доктор GPT

Channel

Доктор GPT

@doktorgpt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

230,270subscribers

-23,656 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002811908024
TypeChannel
Username@doktorgpt
DescriptionМедиа об искусственном интеллекте, инструментах и трендах. Аналитика, апдейты и практическое применение. Доктор GPT – как цифровой врач для ваших задач. Сотрудничество — @DocOnlyAds Рекламный менеджер: @Diggsale, @reklama_nikita, @Spiral_Yuri
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doktorgpt

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

230,270253,926242,0986 August 2026 — 253,926 subscribers6 August 2026 — 253,656 subscribers7 August 2026 — 253,057 subscribers8 August 2026 — 252,477 subscribers9 August 2026 — 251,922 subscribers10 August 2026 — 251,273 subscribers11 August 2026 — 250,718 subscribers12 August 2026 — 250,097 subscribers13 August 2026 — 249,500 subscribers14 August 2026 — 248,783 subscribers16 August 2026 — 247,885 subscribers17 August 2026 — 247,031 subscribers18 August 2026 — 246,451 subscribers19 August 2026 — 245,799 subscribers20 August 2026 — 245,251 subscribers21 August 2026 — 244,565 subscribers22 August 2026 — 243,759 subscribers24 August 2026 — 242,702 subscribers25 August 2026 — 242,047 subscribers26 August 2026 — 241,553 subscribers27 August 2026 — 241,065 subscribers28 August 2026 — 240,524 subscribers29 August 2026 — 240,057 subscribers30 August 2026 — 239,577 subscribers31 August 2026 — 238,973 subscribers1 September 2026 — 238,417 subscribers2 September 2026 — 237,743 subscribers4 September 2026 — 237,041 subscribers7 September 2026 — 235,554 subscribers10 September 2026 — 233,997 subscribers12 September 2026 — 233,043 subscribers14 September 2026 — 232,232 subscribers16 September 2026 — 231,344 subscribers18 September 2026 — 230,270 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -23,656. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 226,722–257,474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:59230,270-1,074
16 Sept 2026, 02:17231,344-888
14 Sept 2026, 07:01232,232-811
12 Sept 2026, 16:37233,043-954
10 Sept 2026, 17:42233,997-1,557
7 Sept 2026, 12:01235,554-1,487
4 Sept 2026, 13:00237,041-702
2 Sept 2026, 20:46237,743-674
1 Sept 2026, 15:44238,417-556
31 Aug 2026, 13:04238,973-604
30 Aug 2026, 11:11239,577-480
29 Aug 2026, 10:43240,057-467
28 Aug 2026, 13:07240,524-541
27 Aug 2026, 13:23241,065-488
26 Aug 2026, 16:02241,553-494
25 Aug 2026, 18:24242,047-655
24 Aug 2026, 17:24242,702-1,057
22 Aug 2026, 23:25243,759-806
21 Aug 2026, 13:46244,565-686
20 Aug 2026, 12:54245,251first reading

Engagement

257 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.71%
avg views ÷ 230,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,800
132 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.825%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
132
of 257 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 131 of 132 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held257 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total1,431,250
Reactions total11,719
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 23:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,900
Videos
≈496
Links
≈1,750

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10h 54m
Average length
8m 04s

Measured directly from 81 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

21,832 reactions across 243 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8,70839.9%
😁7,59334.8%
🔥2,93213.4%
👍2,59911.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 255 of the 257 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,709 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 257 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC≈3,870 views62 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

⚡️Minecraft получит НОВОЕ ИЗМЕРЕНИЕ — встречаем загадочный мир Сифт. Последнее новое измерение добавляли 15 лет назад — это был Край. Кубаноиды, общий сбор ❤️ Доктор GPT

❤62

26 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTC≈6,330 views49 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🔥Если будете дарить вайбкодеру клаву, подарите ему такую ❤️ Доктор GPT

❤31😁18

26 Sept 2026, 13:48 UTC≈6,720 views14 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🐒Мем: ИИ-стартап привлёк $4 млрд - на эти деньги темщики решили открыть сотню КОФЕЕН. Corgi Insurance работает в сфере страхования на основе ИИ. Компания неожиданно решила открыть 100 кофеен в Сан-Франциско за полгода - это направление никак не связанно с изначальным бизнесом. Реализация плана оказалась хаотичной. Одну из двух открытых точек закрыли власти города за работу без лицензии. Компания вела переговоры сра…

❤12😁2

26 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC≈7,930 views124 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🤩Claude теперь суперинтеллект, официально ❤️ Доктор GPT

😁95👍16🔥10❤3

26 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTC≈8,660 views27 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🎁 Жесть: муху, на которой за последний месяц успели провести десятки экспериментов, научили… курить. Чтобы получить «затяжку», насекомому дали на выбор два варианта: нажать на одну кнопку и ударить током своего товарища в клетке или нажать другую и выпустить его на свободу. И что вы думаете? Безжалостная муха восемь (!) раз выбрала красную кнопку и отправила своего товарища под раздачу. Дикий мир мух оказался жест…

😁18❤9

25 Sept 2026, 19:15 UTC≈9,210 views18 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🔥Пробиваем человека перед встречей - вышла нейронка, которая накопает всю инфу из открытых источников по никнейму. Полезно, чтобы не тупить в разговоре и сразу найти темы для разговора. Вы теперь хакер 🔴 пробуем. ❤️ Доктор GPT

😁16❤1👍1

25 Sept 2026, 17:25 UTC≈9,290 views55 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

Парень прокачал поющую рыбу из нулевых с помощью ИИ и превратил её в безжалостного тренера Во время тренировок она включает режим безжалостного японского сэнсея: кроет за лень, не даёт спуска и подкалывает каждый раз, когда хочется бросить планку и лечь на диван. Спасибо, что не мертвая муха ❤️ Доктор GPT

😁38🔥11❤6

25 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC≈9,350 views75 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🎁ChatGPT готовит подписку за $500 или ₽42'000 в месяц - в коде нашли новый тариф Pro Max с самым быстрым режимом для Work и Codex. Лимиты обещают выше, чем х20 на Pro. А аналитики уже считают, что ради нового тарифа дешёвым подпискам могут урезать токены. бесплатный вайбкодинг з/п джуна ❤️ Доктор GPT

😁34❤31🔥6👍4

25 Sept 2026, 06:16 UTC≈10,100 views73 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

⚡️ Прокачиваем Claude на 200% — многоопытный разраб из Anthropic показал мастхэв команду для нейронки В Claude Code обязательно нужно запустить /claude-api prompt-audit . Тогда агент проверит устаревшие инструкции, скиллы, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, а главное — сэкономит минимум 30% токенов. Сохраните, чтобы не забыть ❤️Доктор GPT

❤50🔥17👍3😁3

24 Sept 2026, 19:52 UTC≈10,400 views74 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

⚡️ Геймдев — все: две топовые модели OpenAI и Anthropic разносят индустрию. В сети сравнили, как Opus 5.5 и GPT-6 Sol генерируют 3D-игры в Unreal Engine — и это просто бомба. Обе модели отлично справляются с графикой, детализацией, окружением и плавностью анимаций. Модель OpenAI пока уступает разработке Anthropic, но сам факт, что теперь каждый может создавать игры даже в 3D, — уже захватывает. Попробовать, кстати…

❤35🔥23😁14👍2

24 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC≈10,400 views91 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🎁Госуслуги, пожалуйста ❤️ Доктор GPT

😁55❤36

24 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC≈10,700 views97 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🎁ИИ может и не ревновать вас к другому ИИ, но намеки точно расставит ❤️ Доктор GPT

😁73❤19👍4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 257 posts we hold for @doktorgpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@doktorgpt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Sept 2026, 20:06 UTCAnonymous Poll1,600 voters approx.

Смогли бы полностью отказаться от нейросетей🔴

  1. Смог бы28%
  2. Смог бы, но было бы непросто40%
  3. Не реально37%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 257 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор GPT” (@doktorgpt), 230,270 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doktorgpt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.