Медиа Альфа-Банка для CEO, топ-менеджеров и инвесторов. Бизнес-тренды, обзоры рынков и прогнозы от лучшей команды аналитиков в России
Регистрация в реестре РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/694a5f861d0704120f701ce6
#CNWZ2
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
92,500 average views per post against 12,034 subscribers — an engagement rate of 768.3%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
18 of 18 published in the window (4 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,664,298
Mature posts only
768.3% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 98 days, net +93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,872–12,072 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 02:54
12,049
+29
10 Nov 2026, 06:58
12,020
-9
8 Nov 2026, 16:46
12,029
-7
7 Nov 2026, 13:34
12,036
+2
5 Nov 2026, 11:09
12,034
+1
4 Nov 2026, 14:15
12,033
-5
3 Nov 2026, 11:45
12,038
+10
2 Nov 2026, 09:08
12,028
+3
1 Nov 2026, 09:44
12,025
+8
31 Oct 2026, 08:45
12,017
+16
30 Oct 2026, 06:08
12,001
+2
29 Oct 2026, 07:14
11,999
+8
28 Oct 2026, 02:10
11,991
-2
27 Oct 2026, 03:57
11,993
+1
26 Oct 2026, 01:32
11,992
-9
25 Oct 2026, 03:37
12,001
-10
24 Oct 2026, 00:09
12,011
-4
23 Oct 2026, 03:06
12,015
-2
22 Oct 2026, 05:59
12,017
-11
20 Oct 2026, 21:38
12,028
first reading
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
737.4%
avg views ÷ 12,049 subscribers
Avg views / post
88,800
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.213%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
72 (30 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
2,487,710
Reactions total
5,303
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 09:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈202
Links
≈731
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19m 09s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
15,090 reactions across 71 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,002
39.8%
🔥
4,623
30.6%
👍
3,819
25.3%
custom 5231147734190269621
424
2.81%
🤔
200
1.33%
🤯
16
0.106%
👎
6
0.04%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,262 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
257
across the posts below
Posts paid on
71
of 72 we hold a reading for · 99%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alfa_tops. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (21.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Альфа-Банк создал ЦФА НОВОГО ФОРМАТА с процентом от выручки бизнеса — для кофейни «Дринкит» ⚡️ 🐳
У бизнеса теперь есть новый способ привлечь инвесторов и капитал — предложить долю от выручки через ЦФА. Платформа «А-Токен» от Альфа-Банка организовала инновационный выпуск для крупнейшего франчайзи сети «Дринкит».
Как это работает: ЦФА стоит 100 тыс. рублей, доход по нему привязан к выручке конкретной кофейни Дринкит …
Золото дешевело всю осень и подорожало после выборов в США. Что делать инвесторам? 🥇
У золота в 2026-м американские горки. В начале года его цена била рекорды и была выше 5600 $. В октябре золото падало до годовых минимумов — 3875 $ за унцию. После выборов в США стоимость подскочила на 5%, до 4150 $.
Текущие цены — хороший старт, чтобы вложиться в металл надолго для защиты портфеля, считает 9⃣ Елизавета Арбузова, а…
Поставки в Китай: первый шаг на дороге в тысячу ли 🇨🇳
Российские бренды осваивают китайский рынок: за 9 месяцев 2026-го экспорт из России в Поднебесную прибавил 29% г/г и достиг 116 млрд рублей.
Если тоже хотите выйти в Китай в 2027-м, кое-что стоит сделать уже сейчас. Что именно, узнали на CIIE в Шанхае у эксперта Арнест ЮниРусь, одного из крупнейших производителей FMCG-товаров в России. Они впервые приехали на вы…
Сколько времени нужно на переговоры в Китае 🇨🇳
Две недели, месяц, полгода? Российские компании нередко сталкиваются с этим в работе с китайскими партнёрами: встречи проходят, переписка продолжается, а до подписания контракта дело не доходит.
Как перейти от обсуждений к сделке? Три рекомендации для бизнеса от участников CIIE:
🇨🇳Не списывайте долгие переговоры на традиции. При сильном коммерческом интересе китайский …
Делаем Китай ближе и представляем ВЕСЬ РОССИЙСКИЙ ФИНТЕХ — на событии мирового масштаба. Альфа-Банк в Шанхае 🇨🇳
Здесь проходит China International Import Expo — крупнейшая выставка импорта. В этом году она собрала 4100+ компаний из 162 стран. Среди участников — LVMH, L’Oréal, LEGO, UNIQLO, Mercedes-Benz.
И только один российский банк — Альфа-Банк ❤️
Третий год подряд объединяем в Шанхае бизнес двух стран. Знакомим…
Как усложнить жизнь хакерам одним действием? 💻
Универсального решения для защиты от кибератак не существует. Безопасность требует постоянного контроля. Но есть технические меры, которые заметно усилят инфраструктуру.
Что стоит внедрить в первую очередь — рассказывает 1️⃣ Алексей Новиков, управляющий директор Positive Technologies.
❤️ Telegram | MAX
«Зависит от ситуации» — не принимается ↔️
Что скорее доверите ИИ — важные переговоры или финансовое решение?
Куда инвестировать больше — в людей или технологии?
Покупать сервисы на рынке или вайб-кодить внутри компании?
С этими вопросами каждый день сталкиваются лидеры цифрового бизнеса. Что выберут топ-менеджеры Билайна, Альфа-Банка и СКБ Контур — смотрите на видео.
❤️ Telegram | MAX
Лизинг на скорости ×3 🏃♂️
Лизинг недвижимости, оборудования и тяжёлой техники принято считать долгой историей: в среднем по рынку одобрение заявки занимает 4+ недели.
Альфа-Лизинг всё меняет: запустили быстрые решения по заявкам среднего бизнеса. Для этого упростили маршрут сделок и сократили пакет документов. Результат: можем ускорить одобрение в три раза.
Когда подойдёт быстрое решение:
⏺ Нужно как можно скорее…
Организовали ПЕРВУЮ НА РЫНКЕ цифровых прав сделку для доверительного управляющего 💼
Закон о цифровых валютах и правах, вступивший в силу с 1 сентября, открыл новые возможности на рынке. Теперь с такими активами могут работать управляющие компании и брокеры.
А-Токен и Альфа-Капитал провели премьерную сделку с цифровыми правами — в её рамках УК выступила в качестве доверительного управляющего. Это значимый этап для к…
«В 100% случаев ожидания скептические. В 100% случаев результат их превосходит»
В промышленности не обойтись без роботов, тем более на сложном рынке труда — это понимают все руководители. Но кажется, что сейчас не время для дорогих экспериментов.
Реальной бизнес-практикой поделился 1️⃣ Максим Винокуров, заместитель генерального директора Росатом Сервиса по робототехнике. Он рассказал, как удавалось запустить процес…
Чат-бот пообещал — бизнес заплатил. Как защититься от ошибок ИИ ❌
Что стоит предусмотреть, прежде чем доверить чат-боту общение с клиентами? Разбираем реальный кейс:
Чат-бот авиакомпании Air Canada сообщил пассажиру, что скидку на билет можно оформить уже после перелёта. Клиент купил билеты, но компания отказалась возвращать разницу в цене. На самом деле её правила этого не предусматривали.
Пассажир обратился в су…
❤80🔥70👍26custom 52311477341902696215
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @alfa_tops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 62 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 82 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Немалый бизнес @aaaa_business · 550,554 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 August 2026
Нетмонет @netmonet_co · 193,643 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Масштабный бизнес” (@alfa_tops), 12,049 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alfa_tops.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
