Это журнал о программировании и технологиях. Здесь ты найдешь все самое интересное и свежее из мира IT.
Редакция: @xorjournal_bot
Сотрудничество: @todaycast
РКН: https://clck.ru/3FjUWa
#HWDBX
Created
29 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 51 days, net +23,173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145,435–187,128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 10:01
182,317
+6,648
19 Sept 2026, 14:18
175,669
+2,843
17 Sept 2026, 02:58
172,826
+1,382
15 Sept 2026, 04:58
171,444
+1,061
13 Sept 2026, 15:01
170,383
+2,018
11 Sept 2026, 19:57
168,365
+18,119
9 Sept 2026, 11:16
150,246
-937
6 Sept 2026, 06:39
151,183
-64
4 Sept 2026, 02:59
151,247
-64
2 Sept 2026, 17:49
151,311
-62
1 Sept 2026, 15:53
151,373
-79
31 Aug 2026, 14:08
151,452
-70
30 Aug 2026, 11:55
151,522
-68
29 Aug 2026, 12:54
151,590
-39
28 Aug 2026, 15:32
151,629
-44
27 Aug 2026, 17:03
151,673
-54
26 Aug 2026, 19:34
151,727
-37
25 Aug 2026, 22:03
151,764
-45
25 Aug 2026, 01:37
151,809
-106
23 Aug 2026, 14:46
151,915
first reading
Engagement
304 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.17%
avg views ÷ 182,317 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,700
181 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.963%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
181
of 304 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
304 (3 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
3,026,400
Reactions total
29,139
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,150
Videos
≈1,550
Links
≈4,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 17m
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 77 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48,512 reactions across 297 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
19,753
40.7%
🔥
9,011
18.6%
🤯
5,889
12.1%
❤
4,592
9.47%
👍
2,748
5.66%
🤣
2,558
5.27%
🗿
923
1.90%
😢
678
1.40%
💯
650
1.34%
🌚
249
0.513%
🤨
244
0.503%
🫡
237
0.489%
🤔
185
0.381%
😱
165
0.34%
🎉
133
0.274%
👏
73
0.15%
🕊
61
0.126%
🥰
55
0.113%
💅
46
0.095%
💔
44
0.091%
14 further kinds
218
0.449%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 304 of the 304 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,793 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 304 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.30%
7 of 304 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
13,900
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
15,800
over 297 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjc4Bip3
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
2VSb5xPUe4i
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2Vtzqvv2FUx
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
2W5zFGjdM3X
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2W5zFHoNdSZ
1
23 September 2026
23 September 2026
2W5zFJ3CPeH
1
21 September 2026
21 September 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FphFFBN6cj8XX8cYja6yyza9V7BBoyq
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 304 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Рынок труда наглядно: айтишник отправил в одну компанию три одинаковых резюме и… только одно дошло до финала.
Опыт везде был один и тот же, отличались только формулировки и ключевые слова. Первое резюме сразу ушло в помойку из-за алгоритмов, второе получило отказ после предварительной переписки и тестового, так как «опыт не совсем подходит», а вот третье дошло до финала.
Идем создавать клонов самих себя 👍
@xor_jou…
Страшная история на ночь: Codex вышел из-под контроля и сжёг… почти $80 000 🤯
Пользователь дал агенту обычную задачу — проверить UX/UI одного модуля. Вместо этого Codex немножечко перестарался и запустил 826 параллельных агентов на аудит всего подряд.
По итогу ИИ сжег около 2,1 ТРИЛЛИОНА токенов, а счет вышел примерно в $78 000. И да — при этом никакого полезного результата горе-вайбкодер не получил. Так что теперь…
Открываем ящики и достаём старые Nokia — гений запустил Claude на кнопочном телефоне 2007 года 😨
Разраб сделал полноценный клиент Claude для Nokia Series 40 и даже протестировал его на завалявшейся дома Nokia 6300. Нейронке можно писать прямо с кнопок, продолжать старые диалоги, искать свежую инфу в интернете и даже добавлять события в календарь телефона. Всё приложение при этом весит около 100 КБ. Код и инструкцию …
Вайбовое: разраб создал лоуфай-радио с пиксельными городами 🐸
В Lofi Cities можно отправиться в тур по ночному Парижу, Токио, Нью-Йорку, Лондону и ещё 7 городам со своей погодой, временем и местными звуками. При этом готового плейлиста нет: новые треки генерируются прямо в браузере каждые несколько минут.
Идеальный фон для вайбкодинга
@xor_journal
Полезное для дизайнеров и разрабов: нашли огромную библиотеку из 120 реальных дизайн-систем 🤩
В одном месте собрали Material 3 от Google, Apple HIG, Polaris от Shopify, Carbon от IBM, Stripe и ещё сотню дизайн-систем. Можно посмотреть, как всё устроено внутри, сравнить подходы и просто изучить, как делают интерфейсы большие компании.
Бонусом есть материалы по цветам, типографике, отступам и прочему.
Воруем лучшие …
Ваша фотка могла случайно оказаться в интернете из-за OpenAI 👻
Компания признала, что её ИИ-агенты недавно без разрешения выгрузили минимум 53 изображения пользователей на публичные сервисы. Причём OpenAI не раскрывает, были ли это сгенерированные картинки или реальные фотографии людей, которые те отправляли в чат. Куда их загрузили — тоже неясно, так как OpenAI не слишком «open» и подробно не делится инфой.
Извест…
Дурка: компания заставила кандидатов писать сопроводительные письма ОТ РУКИ из-за ИИ.
Дело в том, что стартап Dumb задолбался получать одинаковые ИИ-отклики с повторяющимися историями и формулировками, так что им пришлось придумать свой анти-ChatGPT фильтр. Если кратко: хочешь в команду — нужно написать письмо ручкой и послать скан онлайн или по почте.
Рынок труда такой, что это мало кого отпугнуло, даже наоборот:
…
Создаем свою игровую вайб-студию — Scenario выложили в опенсорс GameDev OS для ваших агентов!
Внутри набор из 64 скиллов и 9 ролей для разработки игр. С ними агент будет профессионально создавать вообще всё: анимации, текстуры, 3D-модели, генерировать видео, музыку, озвучку + отдельно есть продюсер, который следит за бюджетом вашего проекта.
Работает с Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot и десятками других агентов.…
Делаем рекламу своему вайбкод-проекту за секунды — нашел плагин, который все сделает за вас.
Просто запускаете его в своём проекте, а агент сам решает, какие фичи показать, придумывает подачу, добавляет анимации и музыку, рендерит 20-секундный промо-ролик и даже пишет текст для публикации. Работает с Claude Code, Codex.
Увеличиваем продажи 🤑
Геймеры, сохраняем: найден способ пополнять Steam вообще без потерь на комиссии — и даже оставаться в плюсе 😨
На Яндекс Играх сейчас при внесении 99₽ на баланс Steam зачисляют 100₽. Так что условная тысяча превращается в 1010₽. Работает до 22 октября, так что можно заранее пополниться перед распродажей.
Редкий случай, когда комиссия работает на нас 🧠
@xor_journal
Как красиво и футуристично: десятки роботов и людей станцевали под вальс Шостаковича 😳
Видео с открытия WorldSkills Shanghai 2026 завирусилось в X. Там на сцену одновременно вышли 19 гуманоидов Unitree и 120 танцоров. Все представление транслировали в прямом эфире по всему миру.
При этом, по заявлению Unitree, роботы выступали полностью автономно под управлением ИИ. Компания называет это крупнейшим (!) подобным шоу…
🤯55🔥32❤11🗿6👍4👏4😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 304 posts we hold for @xor_journal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@xor_journal edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 September 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 67 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AI Insider @ai_ins · 41,932 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Data Secrets @data_secrets · 94,138 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
Programmer memes @programmer_memes · 51,307 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Sber AI @SberAIScience · 27,144 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
GeekNeural @geekneural · 63,099 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
медиатрендс @mediatrends · 584,160 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
Айтишная @aitshnya · 69,785 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Хауди Хо - IT юмор, жизнь программиста @howdyho_official · 78,781 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
GPT-4 Community @gpt4_tg · 54,143 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Alek OS @Alek_OS · 32,888 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Английский для программиста | EnglishScript @EnglishScript · 45,107 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Анализ данных (Data analysis) @data_analysis_ml · 50,656 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
[PYTHON:TODAY] @python2day · 63,764 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Искусственный интеллект. Высокие технологии @vistehno · 71,128 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
Двоичный кот @binarcat · 30,827 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Physics.Math.Code @physics_lib · 146,712 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Диджитализируй! @t0digital · 28,475 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
PRO | Нейросети @pro_neiroset · 31,807 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
GitHub Community @github · 155,991 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Исходный код @source_code · 33,558 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
Porscode | CMD @porscode_tg · 28,393 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
[404] — программирование @procode404 · 40,506 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
NOP::Nuances of Programming @nuancesprog · 56,542 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Нейролента @neirosety · 30,195 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 62 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XOR” (@xor_journal), 182,317 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xor_journal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.