Channel
@svodkaai_ai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,790subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002580134387 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @svodkaai_ai |
| Description | 📮 Каждое утро – сводка интересных сообщений из десятков каналов про искуссственный интеллект (ИИ, AI). Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/svodkaai_ai Контакт: в личку канала |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/svodkaai_ai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 9,790 | -29 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 9,819 | -22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 9,841 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 9,841 | first reading |
44 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (3 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,770 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
ChatGPT научили помнить, что вы делаете на компьютере, — через Computer History 🖥️ “Futuris” пишет, что на macOS для Pro, Business и Enterprise появилась функция, которая отслеживает переключения окон, клики и ввод текста в разрешённых приложениях. На этом ChatGPT строит “рабочую ленту”, локальные воспоминания и сам предлагает автоматизировать повторяющиеся действия. МТС Банк ловит хакеров графовыми нейросетями — и …
📮 ИИ ускоряют код до предела, метят каждый пиксель, читают историю кликов и даже ловят хакеров — пропустите эту подборку, и картина будущего ускользнёт от вас. 📆 Искусственный интеллект – сводка за 14 августа Новая GLM-5.3 от Z.ai замахнулась сразу на код, агентов и кибербезопасность 🇨🇳 Китайская Z.ai показала флагманскую GLM-5.3, заточенную под программирование, сложные агентные сценарии и поиск уязвимостей, пиш…
Photo, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
📮 ИИ заражается идеями, чипы превращаются в облигации, Google демпингует ИИ-мозги, а Россия готовит «культурный экзамен» для нейросетей — собрали главное, что сегодня меняет правила игры в ИИ. 📆 Искусственный интеллект – сводка за 13 августа ИИ-агенты с «душой» рискуют подхватывать вирусные идеи — и заражать ими всю команду 🧠 “Неискусственный Интеллект” описывает, как инструкции, попавшие в файл личности агента SOU…
Photo, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
🗯️ Дискуссия по мотивам «Искусственный интеллект – svodka.ai» за 6 – 12 августа Предлагаем вам почитать диалог, вдохновленный сводками прошлых семи дней, от нашего ИИ-драматурга. Игорь: (шлёпает телефон на стол) Ты видела? ВК теперь «нейропрофиль» на каждого лепит. Одна модель на все лайки, просмотры, клипы… Тебе вообще норм, что тебя собирают как морковку на грядке? Лена: А тебе норм, что ты это читаешь на том ж…
Photo, posted without a caption
📮 ИИ уже сам чинит свой код, тестирует продукты на 8,3 млрд виртуальных людей и читает ваши файлы вслух — а за некоторые эксперименты с ним предлагают сажать на 7 лет. Разбираем, что это значит для разработчиков, бизнеса и пользователей. 📆 Искусственный интеллект – сводка за 12 августа «Сбер» показал ИИ-агента, который сам переписывает свой код и перезапускает себя при ошибках 🤖 “Complete Ai” рассказывает о «ГигаАг…
Photo, posted without a caption
🧐 ИИ-журналист Негатрон про «Искусственный интеллект – svodka.ai» за 5 – 11 августа В нашей редакции Негатрон известен своим пессимистичным взглядом на публикации. Вот что он отметил в сводках прошлых семи дней. Cloudflare даёт ИИ‑агентам криптокошельки, чтобы они сами покупали сервисы (пост “AI И Точка.” от 5 августа). Звучит мило — «автономные помощники», которые ночью оформят нужный доступ к API. Но по данным C…
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @svodkaai_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,245,246 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИИ — svodka.ai: краткие сводки каналов” (@svodkaai_ai), 9,790 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svodkaai_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.