Инвестиции — это не только про деньги Ты знаешь, как отличить настоящий прорыв от временной шумихи? Смотри не на громкие заголовки, а на последовательность действий. Если кто-то за пару лет увеличивает ценность проекта в разы, там точно есть чёткий план, а не просто удача. Вот и в личном развитии так же. Настоящий рост — это не про единичный рывок, а про систему. Создай свой "инвестиционный раунд": пропиши привычки…

Channel
Чек-листы марафоны
@motionchek
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,988subscribers
-640 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001352173751 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @motionchek |
| Description | Не позволяйте вчерашнему дню красть сегодняшний ⚡️ 👉 Купить рекламу https://reklama.expert-book.pro/telegram Менеджер @JaMasha 📖Реклама внутри книги https://expert-book.pro/pp 🥇 Книга под ключ: https://expert-book.pro/ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/motionchek |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 42,988 | -37 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 43,025 | -45 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 43,070 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 43,086 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 43,102 | -59 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 43,161 | -53 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 43,214 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:24 | 43,221 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:53 | 43,243 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 43,258 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 43,278 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 43,293 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 43,308 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 43,319 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 43,330 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 43,341 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 43,349 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 43,366 | -35 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 43,401 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 43,417 | first reading |
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.86%
- avg views ÷ 42,988 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,240
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (5 June 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 50,850 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 12:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,230
- Videos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈838
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.63%
- 1 of 38 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 6,150
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 5,790
- over 37 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFHkzWdo | 1 | 24 June 2026 | 24 June 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Книга в печать, а факты проверили Как системно проверить сотни цифр, имён и цитат в рукописи, не утонув в хаосе правок? В разборе показали на примерах, как организовать фактчекинг: от создания реестра источников до фиксации последних изменений перед отправкой в типографию. Посмотрите порядок действий.
Она вернула платье, в котором была красивой. Красное платье. Бирка на месте. Следов носки нет. Причина возврата — не подошёл размер. Матвей мог принять его за минуту и заняться следующим человеком. Но кот лёг на пакет. Шесть килограммов препятствия нормальному рабочему дню. Женщину зовут Инга. Она купила платье для свидания, дошла до ресторана и увидела себя в стекле. Мужчина уже ждал внутри. А она посмотрела на от…
Как не превратиться в бессонную сову для клиентов Все мы хотим быть отзывчивыми, особенно на старте своего дела. Но иногда эта открытость оборачивается против нас самих. Клиент может подумать, что вы работаете круглосуточно, если вы сами этого не оговорите. Со временем это ведёт к выгоранию и потере качества работы. Ваши личные границы — это не про жадность, а про уважение к своему времени и энергии. Пропишите в до…
Как написать биографию основателя компании Часто авторы думают, что биография основателя — это просто хронология событий, и упускают главное: личность, голос, живые детали. А потом книга не цепляет читателей, хотя всё по фактам верно. В статье разобрали, как собрать архив и провести интервью, где провести семейные границы и как сохранить интонацию героя — показали весь путь от идеи до готового текста со сроками и бю…
Новый умный помощник от Google теперь доступен по приятной цене Крупные компании продолжают соревноваться в создании искусственного интеллекта. На этот раз Google представила новую, более быструю и доступную версию своей модели Gemini. Если вы следите за технологиями для саморазвития, это может быть полезным инструментом. Теперь мощный ИИ, сравнимый с топовыми аналогами, можно использовать по подписке или через API…
Можно не знать. И всё равно принять хорошее решение Нас приучили думать, что перед важным выбором должна появиться ясность. Ещё немного информации, ещё один совет, ещё одна таблица — и наконец станет понятно, как правильно. Обычно не становится. Будущее молчит, варианты остаются спорными, а решение всё равно приходится принимать вам. «Можно не знать» — книга о том, как действовать без гарантий: понять, когда информ…
Не жди чуда, начинай действовать Всегда кажется, что для старта нужна какая-то волшебная вещь. Новые наушники, супер-приложение, идеальный курс. Мы откладываем важные шаги, пока не появится "правильный" инструмент. Но суть не в гаджете, а в действии. Самый простой чек-лист на бумаге работает лучше, чем самый продвинутый девайс, пылящийся в коробке. Сфокусируйся на процессе, а не на поиске идеальных условий для него…
Одна дорогая проблема сильнее ста умных мыслей Когда автор пытается ничего не потерять, первым теряется читатель. Статья помогает выбрать центральную задачу книги, превратить опыт в метод и вовремя остановить парад любимых кейсов. Посмотрите каркас экспертной книги.
Звездный провал за $1,2 млн Запустить стартап в сфере ментального здоровья — отличная идея. Но даже если в твоем проекте засветилась Селена Гомес, это не гарантирует успех. Инвесторы вложили в её компанию Wondermind больше миллиона, но звезда якобы не раскручивала проект как обещала. Теперь суды и скандал. Мораль: за красивым фасадом должен быть реальный план и действия, а не только громкое имя. Чек лист марафоны …
Не начинайте писать книгу, пока не ответили на эти 7 вопросов Статья о том, как предпринимателю проверить идею книги до рукописи: понять её бизнес-задачу, читателя, главную мысль, доказательства, способ распространения и метрику результата. В итоге станет ясно, стоит ли вообще писать эту книгу — и что нужно изменить, чтобы она работала на бизнес, а не просто красиво стояла на полке.
Иногда человеку не нужен второй шанс. Ему нужно несколько часов Савва видел слишком много людей, уверенных, что именно этой ночью надо всё закончить. Самое смешное — когда-то он тоже был уверен, что лучше других знает, как им следует жить. Только тогда Савва был не барменом, а хранителем. Однажды он вмешался в чужую судьбу — и за это получил бар, в котором теперь должен смотреть, как люди принимают решения сами. «Б…
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @motionchek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iAmbitious · 126,262#1
@Meditaciya_dlya_nachinayushchih · 18,143#2
@Joga_dlya_nachinayushchih · 17,738#3
@Kultura_obuchenie · 51,165#4
@free_edu · 309,050#5
@effective_official · 44,118#6
@flibusta_anglysky · 368,957#7
@moe_obrazovanie · 229,340#8
@Knizhnaya_polka_marketologa · 35,319#9
@Razvitie_sila_voli · 20,382#10
@klabukova_mlm · 392#11
@marketolog_marketing · 82,438#12
@Energiya_molodost · 51,071#13
@Psihologiya_samorazvitie · 50,273#14
@podkasty24 · 187,881#15
@skillget · 80,986#16
@worklis · 68,410#17
@communication_department · 41,197#18
@podkasti_audioknigi · 84,641#19
@kapital_amerika · 30,839#20
@timebiohack · 6,136#21
@todolist1 · 24,060#22
@smmau · 6,279#23
@cml_rus · 1,107#24
@k_pustovaya · 7,383#25
@mindful_self · 1,972#26
@bebettep · 9,181#27
@Printout1 · 28,944#28
@productivity_Q · 26,585#29
@kurs_obrazovanie · 120,295#30
@architec_real · 3,090#31
@Selfdevelopment_money · 76,982#32
@eruditurl24 · 97,352#33
@slivkb · 16,245#34
@Familymanager · 10,853#35
@BigBrains · 63,781#36
@Perevod_s_bogatogo · 17,648#37
@frilans_rabota_vakansii · 36,165#38
@ikyklovod · 70,004#39
@DELO_govorim · 68,513#40
@sliv_freedom · 73,976#41
@chakri_machakri · 350#42
@kripi · 8,314#43
@d_za40 · 3,732#44
@l906090 · 9,315#45
@prodaji_so_mnoi · 938#46
@Anshulyakfitness · 696 (as read 28 August 2026)#47
@startup_club24 · 76,617#48
@openmanagement · 5,635#49
@chitaykaclubchannel · 611#50
@kanalsily · 13,797#51
@goncharovaastrolog · 338#52
@shanina_youtube · 1,145#53
@MediatorOK · 513#54
@nastavnik_kavkaz · 472#55
@gay_nastyaa_public · 1,674#56
@socpower · 1,976#57
@oganov_digital · 605 (as read 28 August 2026)#58
@waytohap · 10,695#59
@community_cybersec · 489#60
@umniymedik · 5,431#61
@masloyvtg · 8,945#62
@neurobiomedi · 1,039#63
@Pisatel_rasskazy · 89,238#64
@samo_razvitije · 2,700#65
@knigi_oz_oz · 740 (as read 28 August 2026)#66
@bizij · 8,132#67
@arhiv_ezoterika · 11,951#68
@SportsBody · 2,179#69
@English_Testi · 8,929#70
@ForGreatPeople · 694 (as read 28 August 2026)#71
@levitsergei · 2,406#72
@notes_about_QA · 3,611#73
@m_hristosenko · 25,445#74
@tenderplan · 2,025#75
@psihoa · 13,849#76
@Tkachenko_nutrition · 724#77
@OSVEZHENIYE_V_LYUBVI · 1,178#78
@showstartup · 27,048#79
@pohuditel2 · 39,294#80
@marketing_s · 5,862#81
@PersonHunters · 212#82
@cdmshsakhalin · 683#83
@yogashkola_com · 328 (as read 28 August 2026)#84
@LMlisten · 2,190#85
@laz_english · 8,370#86
@tdyutnb · 1,674#87
@rbcgrp · 1,108#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@podkasti_audioknigi · 84,641
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@worklis · 68,410
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 August 2026
@Knizhnaya_polka_marketologa · 35,319
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
@Energiya_molodost · 51,071
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@effective_official · 44,118
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
@iAmbitious · 126,262
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@Kultura_obuchenie · 51,165
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@Razvitie_sila_voli · 20,382
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 September 2026
@kapital_amerika · 30,839
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
@Psihologiya_samorazvitie · 50,273
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@communication_department · 41,197
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
@skillget · 80,986
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@ikyklovod · 70,004
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@productivity_Q · 26,585
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
@Pisatel_rasskazy · 89,238
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@marketolog_marketing · 82,438
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@frilans_rabota_vakansii · 36,165
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
@BigBrains · 63,781
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@DELO_govorim · 68,513
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
@startup_club24 · 76,617
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@profi_kursi_gaidi · 94,372
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чек-листы марафоны” (@motionchek), 42,988 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/motionchek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.