Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дайджест копирайтера

Channel

Дайджест копирайтера

@copywritersdigest

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,566subscribers

-168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001223692346
TypeChannel
Username@copywritersdigest
DescriptionКанал для копирайтеров, редакторов, маркетологов и всех, кто работает с контентом 💚 По вопросам @Kaloeva_1 Каналы ДК: https://vk.com/copywritersdigest https://max.ru/join/88oPxc7V14n3Uoh6SaO6xUVL3HbU0eaG4VA4KgTL6w8 https://dzen.ru/copywritersdigest
Created21 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/copywritersdigest

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,5669,7449,6556 August 2026 — 9,734 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,736 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,731 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,729 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,744 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,741 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,734 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,738 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,730 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,729 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,693 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,692 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,686 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,657 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,642 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,624 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,626 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,622 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,611 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,601 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,589 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,587 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,582 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,574 subscribers11 November 2026 — 9,566 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 97 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,539–9,771 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 17:219,566-8
8 Nov 2026, 00:359,574-8
5 Nov 2026, 02:269,582-5
2 Nov 2026, 04:219,587-2
30 Oct 2026, 11:569,589-12
27 Oct 2026, 06:369,601-10
24 Oct 2026, 06:189,611-11
18 Oct 2026, 01:189,622-4
15 Oct 2026, 01:209,626+2
12 Oct 2026, 04:589,624-18
5 Oct 2026, 18:209,642-15
28 Sept 2026, 10:569,657-29
18 Sept 2026, 14:179,686-6
14 Sept 2026, 03:209,692-1
10 Sept 2026, 16:209,693-36
5 Sept 2026, 15:389,729-1
1 Sept 2026, 10:099,730-8
29 Aug 2026, 02:129,738+4
26 Aug 2026, 04:099,734-7
22 Aug 2026, 19:459,741first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.55%
avg views ÷ 9,566 subscribers
Avg views / post
818
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held28 (30 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total5,725
Reactions total123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 00:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,370
Videos
≈12
Links
≈2,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

643 reactions across 27 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19530.3%
👍13821.5%
🔥11517.9%
😁9915.4%
💯568.71%
✍233.58%
💔121.87%
⚡20.311%
👎20.311%
🙏10.156%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 643 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC414 views21 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤13🔥5👍3

26 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC810 views27 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Привет новеньким! 👋 Я Настя Калоева, веду «Дайджест копирайтера», пишу для Нейромедиа, журнала «Конверт» и других проектов. Если вы недавно подписались на канал, то здесь вы найдете материалы, которые помогут бесплатно развиваться в профессии: лучше писать и редактировать, осваивать новые инструменты и учиться у коллег. Что можно найти на канале: 🔡 Практические советы — #сборниксоветов. Можно сразу применять в ра…

❤14🔥7👍6

23 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTC730 views11 reactionsread 13 November 2026

📍 Еще порция полезных статей из Нейромедиа Это журнал про нейросети, где я и другие замечательные авторы пишут про ИИ: как использовать его в работе и в жизни. Вот что вышло за последние пару недель: 🔵Как клонировать чужой голос — 10 сервисов, чтобы заговорить по-новому 🔵13 нейросетей для создания песен: пишем трек, не заходя в студию 🔵13 китайских ИИ на замену ChatGPT и Midjourney 🔵16 нейросетей для генерации в…

❤6👍3🔥2

21 Oct 2026, 12:26 UTC751 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Почему некоторые вопросы лучше гуглить сразу в двух поисковиках P.S. В этот раз правильно ответил Google, но так бывает не всегда)

😁7👍4💯2❤1

16 Oct 2026, 07:59 UTC983 viewsread 13 November 2026
Poll

Если сравнивать с прошлым годом, как у вас изменилось количество заказов на тексты / SMM?

  1. Стало больше8%
  2. Стало меньше36%
  3. Примерно столько же9%
  4. Только начинаю — пока не с чем сравнивать23%
  5. Работаю в штате, отдельные заказы не беру23%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTC967 views33 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Типичная работа в Telegram: ❌ Отключить все уведомления, чтобы не отвлекаться от работы ✅ Начать переживать, что нет уведомлений и открывать каждые 5 минут

💯22😁8👍2❤1

14 Oct 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,070 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026

📎Памятка: как выбрать режим работы ChatGPT в зависимости от задачи Некоторые выбирают самую мощную модель ChatGPT даже для простых дел — например, чтобы исправить опечатки или найти тему для статьи. На это тратится больше лимитов, времени, но результат может быть даже хуже, чем на простой модели. Поэтому модель и уровень рассуждений нужно подбирать под задачу — ниже краткая сводка, как OpenAI советует это делать. …

🔥11❤3👍3

12 Oct 2026, 10:34 UTC842 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

В Codex (ИИ-агенте OpenAI) появились подсказки для запросов Они помогают сформулировать запрос с учетом контекста беседы и текущей задачи пользователя. Чтобы вставить подсказку, достаточно нажать Tab. Готовый запрос появится в поле ввода — его можно отредактировать и отправить.

🔥5

11 Oct 2026, 12:43 UTC907 views27 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Даже Вордстат сегодня не работает Шлём лучики поддержки Яндексу ❤️

❤13💔9💯3✍2

11 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC890 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Заметила такую вещь — в будни некоторые нейронки сильно тормозят с ответом, зато в выходные работают гораздо быстрее ИИ, я вообще-то отдохнуть хотела 😭

💯7😁6❤3✍1

9 Oct 2026, 07:03 UTC970 views29 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Как организовать работу редакции без постоянных авралов Екатерина Сурина — редакционный директор медиакомпании Teller. Она координирует несколько проектов и работает с командами авторов и редакторов. Екатерина рассказала, как планировать нагрузку и распределять роли в команде, чтобы руководителю не приходилось следить за каждой задачей → Полный материал — в Teller

❤12🔥11👍5✍1

7 Oct 2026, 06:04 UTC857 views12 reactionsread 8 November 2026

📍 Еще порция полезных статей из Нейромедиа Это журнал про нейросети, где я и другие замечательные авторы пишут про ИИ: как использовать его в работе и в жизни. Вот что вышло за последние пару недель: 🔵Гайд по LM Studio: как запускать нейросети на ПК 🔵Как оплачивать зарубежные нейросети из России и забыть про расстояние 🔵Как установить Codex и начать им пользоваться Подборки: 🔵 Нейросети для родителей — 12 серви…

❤7✍3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @copywritersdigest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@copywritersdigest edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
6 November 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @copywritersdigest as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Oct 2026, 07:59 UTCAnonymous Poll132 voters

Если сравнивать с прошлым годом, как у вас изменилось количество заказов на тексты / SMM?

  1. Стало больше8%
  2. Стало меньше36%
  3. Примерно столько же9%
  4. Только начинаю — пока не с чем сравнивать23%
  5. Работаю в штате, отдельные заказы не беру23%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Редакция Рыба
@ryba_team · 20,254
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 September 2026
Карты, тексты, два ствола
@remingtonist · 26,857
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
Записки редакторки
@zapiski_redaktorki · 93,608
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Текст в тексте
@textvtexte · 22,072
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Текстодром: копирайтер, переводчик, редактор, журналист, сммщик и пиарщик, UX-писатель
@textodromo · 31,694
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
Вакансии для копирайтеров
@copywriter_vacancies · 30,359
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Копирайтер, редактор — удаленная работа
@self_ma · 33,669
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
ChatGPT, помоги!
@GPThelp_ru · 514,092
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Work for writers
@Work4writers · 34,696
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 September 2026
Паша и его прокрастинация
@abbsol · 29,402
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,268
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
Редактируем зп | Вакансии для копирайтеров
@edit_zp · 21,446
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 September 2026
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 30,996
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Норм удалёнка
@normremote · 36,793
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
Вредный корректор
@julia_v_redcor · 19,953
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
Умный Брокколь | Грамотность
@brokoledu · 42,695
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Работа с текстами — вакансии
@work_editor · 32,448
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
Инструменты маркетолога
@profit_maker · 45,361
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
Это работа для редактора
@glvrd_job · 22,905
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Работа от енота
@workenot · 24,938
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
Job for Media & Content
@forallmedia · 23,491
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 September 2026
ФРИЛАНС
@uvetrovoi · 22,825
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Норм работа
@normrabota · 142,872
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
ЛОВИ ОФФЕР!
@freelancefam · 32,055
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дайджест копирайтера” (@copywritersdigest), 9,566 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/copywritersdigest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.