Привет, редактор! 1. Главный редактор журнала «Объединение» Анастасия Лобачева рассказала, как они находят героев, почему важны уникальные визуалы и интервью с художниками, как они популяризируют современное искусство и снимают с него стигму элитарности. https://teller.media/intervyu-s-glavnym-redaktorom-zhurnala-obedinenie/ 2. В блоге «Скиллбокса» рассказали об основах контент-маркетинга: что это такое, какие зада…

Channel
Что почитать редактору
@redaktoru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,098subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001055894435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redaktoru |
| Description | Ежедневная подборка лучших статей для редактора. Сайт — http://redaktoru.ru/ Редакционные вопросы — @igorgo Менеджер по рекламе — @valeraArapov Включен в перечень зарегистрированных каналов — https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a376c024c8ba6dca8b491b |
| Created | 26 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redaktoru |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 15,098 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 15,099 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 15,101 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 15,102 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 15,104 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 15,105 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 15,101 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 15,103 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 15,103 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.42%
- avg views ÷ 15,098 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,120
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (3 June 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,082 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈237
- Videos
- ≈14
- Links
- ≈2,830
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 4.55%
- 1 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 570
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 1,790
- over 21 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvL8Cc3 | 1 | 11 August 2026 | 11 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Интеллектуальное усиление автора с помощью нейросетей Привет! Это редакция проекта «Что почитать редактору». Пришли рассказать, что до 14 августа мы снизили цену на наш курс «Интеллектуальное усиление автора с помощью нейросетей» на 50%. Этот курс о том, как использовать нейросети, чтобы писать глубже, быстрее и качественнее. Но при этом оставаться автором, а не превращаться в оператора промптов. Мы не учим генер…
Привет, редактор! 1. Директор по контент-стратегии Инна Куперман рассказала, что в 2026 году главной метрикой в контент-маркетинге становится не охват, а качество внимания пользователя, которое невозможно измерить напрямую, но можно рассчитать через модель атрибуции и анализ поведения. https://teller.media/kakie-metriki-aktualny-dlya-kontent-marketinga-v-2026/ 2. На «Хабре» рассказали о пяти инструментах для автор…
Привет, редактор! 1. Главред «Текстерры» Дарья Завьялова рассказала, как использует функцию «Проекты» в чат-гпт для редакторской работы: чтобы сохранять контекст, историю решений, редакционные правила и источники, связанные с блогом, быстрее проверять статьи на повторы, сверять факты и не объяснять задачи каждый раз заново. https://texterra.ru/blog/kak-proekty-chatgpt-pomogayut-redaktoram.html 2. Книжный обозревате…
Привет, редактор! 1. На «Медиабич» рассказали, зачем оконная компания выпускает собственную печатную газету. https://mediabitch.ru/normalnye-spletni-zachem-kompaniya-izgotovitel-okon-vypuskaet-korporativnuyu-gazetu-na-bumage/ 2. В блоге «Юнисендера» показали приемы оформления таблиц, которые помогают сделать ее удобной для чтения. https://www.unisender.com/ru/blog/kak-oformit-tablicu-dlya-otcheta-sajta-socsetej У…
Привет, редактор! 1. «Писательство — естественное умение человеческого мозга». Интервью с литературным редактором Дашей Анацко. https://ktostudent.ru/dasha-anacko/ 2. Максим Ильяхов рассказал, есть ли смысл часто постить контент. https://bureau.ru/soviet/20260726/ Успехов!
Привет, редактор! 1. Консультант по стратегическому маркетингу Аксинья Носкова объяснила, почему главным дефицитом на рекламном рынке сегодня становится не внимание, а доверие. https://www.sostav.ru/publication/kogda-vse-stanovitsya-media-pochemu-doverie-novaya-tsennost-reklamnogo-rynka-85298.html 2. В блоге «Скиллбокса» рассказали, как была устроена реклама в СССР. https://skillbox.ru/media/design/reklam-konstrukt…
Привет, редактор! 1. В «Журналисте» рассказали, как региональные редакции «Аргументов и фактов» привлекают молодую аудиторию с помощью мультиформатных проектов. https://jrnlst.ru/2026/07/20/161862/ 2. На «Ноже» рассказали,о чём писали дореволюционные женские журналы. https://knife.media/o-chem-pisali-zhenskiye-zhurnaly-do-revolutsii/ 3. В блоге «Айти-эдженси» рассказали о 12 способах улучшить имейл-маркетинг с пом…
Привет, редактор! 1. Игорь Штанг рассказал, какие слова и словосочетания нежелательно разрывать переносом строки. https://nobelfaik.livejournal.com/285727.html 2. В «Журналисте» рассказали, как российские медиа внедряют ИИ в производство, с какими рисками и неоднозначной реакцией аудитории сталкиваются. https://jrnlst.ru/2026/07/15/161821/ Успехов!
Привет, редактор! 1. В «Теллере» опубликовали отрывок из книги «Я — издатель», в котором рассказали об основных каналах книжной дистрибуции для независимых издательств. https://teller.media/ya-izdatel-distribution/ 2. Представители издательства МИФ объяснили свою позицию по скандалу вокруг книги «Мифология Лавкрафта», автора которой заподозрили в использовании ИИ. https://knife.media/vsyo-menshe-tekstov-sozdannyh-b…
Привет, редактор! 1. Канадское креативное агентство на основе культурных сигналов выделило основные тренды в контенте. https://vc.ru/marketing/3018636-trendy-kontenta-2026-goda-ot-agentstva-arcade 2. Журналисты из разных редакций рассказали, как они переживают состояние «нулевого ресурса» и профессиональное выгорание. https://jrnlst.ru/2026/07/03/161655 Успехов!
Привет, редактор! 1. В «Журналисте» рассказали, почему новостные редакции часто публикуют однотипные материалы, как это утомляет аудиторию и ведёт к выгоранию журналистов, а также предложили способы сознательного разнообразия тем, географии, источников, форматов и ракурсов. https://jrnlst.ru/2026/07/01/161615/ 2. На «Ноже» рассказали, что такое криптопоэтика и на примерах Пушкина, Достоевского и Набокова показали, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @redaktoru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 781,107 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что почитать редактору” (@redaktoru), 15,098 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redaktoru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.