Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Антон Власов

Channel

Антон Власов

@vlasov_blog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,602subscribers

+135 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001785978890
TypeChannel
Username@vlasov_blog
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vlasov_blog

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,4604,6024,5316 August 2026 — 4,467 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,467 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,465 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,460 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,462 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,465 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,480 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,507 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,517 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,518 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,543 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,573 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,602 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,439–4,623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:394,602+29
14 Sept 2026, 02:174,573+30
10 Sept 2026, 18:204,543+25
1 Sept 2026, 19:164,518+1
29 Aug 2026, 13:384,517+10
23 Aug 2026, 04:344,507+27
19 Aug 2026, 06:454,480+15
16 Aug 2026, 05:584,465+3
12 Aug 2026, 15:044,462+2
10 Aug 2026, 00:464,460-5
6 Aug 2026, 18:104,465-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:034,467no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:204,467first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

676 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁17726.2%
🔥16925.0%
👍12618.6%
9614.2%
💯375.47%
🤡223.25%
🙏162.37%
😭152.22%
🍌50.74%
🍾50.74%
🕊50.74%
🌭30.444%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 764 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 24 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vlasov_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC288 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как мы делали дизайн и разработку сайта для Связки через ИИ? Изначально я думал, что мы будем делать этот сервис по старинке: дизайнер, верстальщик, копирайтер И так далее Цена вопроса - тысяч от 150 минимум даже на фрилансе, агентства – от 350-400 (ибо 15 страниц дизайна и копирайта) Когда вышел Claude Code, появилась шальная идея – а может попробовать через ИИ? Я написал пост с поиском подрядчика, и в личку мне

7👍3🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC509 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Встретился с другом, который только-только расстался с девушкой, чтобы обсудить все это Надпись напротив нашего стола в кальянке…

😁24🍌5🌭3💯1

8 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC528 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как мы чуть не проебали новый IT продукт в Галере (часть 5) - предыдущие сверху Запускаемся мы в итоге числа 20 июля) https://svyazka.galera-club.ru • Мы успели договориться с Callibri – сервисом, которым пользуются многие маркетологи, ребята дают до 35% комиссии с установок клиентам их сервисов (виджеты, попапы, коллтрекинги) • Появляется известный SEOшникам сервис Keys.so для аналитики SEO • И например сервис фин

👍4🤡42

7 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC734 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Только что записали охуенный подкаст у одного известного блогера в диджиталке (50к+ в ютубе) 😈 Есть идеи, кто это? Пишите в комменты

5👍1

7 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC860 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как мы чуть не проебали новый IT продукт в Галере (часть 4) - предыдущие сверху Реальность бьет обухом по голове. Наша красивая табличка на 25 сервисов, к которым мы планировали гордо прийти и сказать: «мы вас продавать будем, вот кейс Еламы», начинает стремительно краснесть. Каждая красная строчка – это отказ в партнерстве в какой-то из сторон Внезапно выясняется (ну как внезапно - конечно все это можно было преду

👍3🤡3🙏2

6 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC970 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как мы чуть не проебали новый IT продукт в Галере (часть 3) - предыдущие сверху Все свои проекты я всегда запускал сам. Галеру мы собрали с Наташей за неделю: Наташа делала расписание мерпориятий, собирала Советы Директоров и обучала их. Я собирал сайт на Тильде, взяв за основу шаблон страницы Белого Квадрата, прикручивал оплаты и делал рекламу. Так мы за неделю кровью, потом и бессонными ночами запустили MVP Галер

👍7🤡3🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,110 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁58👍3

5 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,170 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

сука я угарну если я реально на этой хуйне бизнес построю ахахаха Антон Власов – главный импортер Клода в Россию кто то возит айфоны серым импортом – я буду возить Клод

😁344👍4

5 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,160 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Знаки судьбы продолжаются

😁19🔥16

5 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC≈1,180 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как мы запустили новый IT продукт в Галере (часть 2) >> Часть 1 тут << Прежде чем идти реализовывать, я всегда проверяю одну вещь. Она помогает не обосраться потом на запуске, запустив то, что нахуй никому не нужно))) Я иду проверять на зарубежке, запустил ли кто-то такое же, и заработал ли на этом денег Логика простая – если в мире нет НИКОГО, кто заработал на этом норм денег, скорее всего идея говно, просто я это

🔥24👍52

4 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А мы в Галере запустили еще один сервис – Связка Да, мы расчехлили b2b AI SAAS говномёт, и что вы нам сделаете? Я рассказывал про это в ролике, но если вы пропустили, вот краткий экскурс, как мы нашли идею бизнеса В бизнесе оч важно ЗАМЕЧАТЬ то, что хорошо срабатывает. Мозг интуитивно замечает только плохое, неудачи. А важнее видеть хорошее: где хвалят клиенты, где много пользы им, где есть спрос незакрытый. Замеча

👍31🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC≈1,240 views45 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Я зарабатываю на своей жене! Сказала мне Алёна, когда на ее вопрос: «а можно купить у вас доступ в Клод?», я назвал ей цену))) Предыдущий пост про то, как пользоваться Клодом без ВПН, набрал рекордное количество сохранений (больше 300 штук) И потом регулярно меня стали спрашивать типа: «слушай, а можно доступ в ваш купить? не хочу ебаться сам с сервером и этим всем» И я какое-то время отмахивался, мол, да мы для

👍2511🔥6🤡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @vlasov_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Телеграмма от Максима Юрина
@yumaks · 42,473
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
Полезный Парфун
@ParfunA · 21,948
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 September 2026
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 30,350
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Всевидящее Шоко
@vseshoko · 25,806
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 September 2026
Наталья Гриценко про маркетинг и платный трафик
@target_nata · 22,055
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Румянцев Рулит
@drumyanzev · 22,355
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 47,331
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Антон Власов” (@vlasov_blog), 4,602 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vlasov_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.