Как это выглядит: https://youtube.com/shorts/5Z8PGGl34wQ?si=llG78tUgd3X5QPRa Как это снимается: https://youtube.com/shorts/DjS1o1BC6rU?si=SnFOXh6dsCxHKp37
Signed Maxim Ilyahov

Channel
@social_book
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,174subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002238551925 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @social_book |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/social_book |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 3,174 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 3,177 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 3,179 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 3,180 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 3,180 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 22 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
318 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 88 | 27.7% | |
| ❤ | 76 | 23.9% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 16.7% | |
| 😭 | 30 | 9.43% | |
| 😎 | 27 | 8.49% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 3.46% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 3.46% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.89% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 1.57% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 1.57% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.629% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.629% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.314% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.314% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как это выглядит: https://youtube.com/shorts/5Z8PGGl34wQ?si=llG78tUgd3X5QPRa Как это снимается: https://youtube.com/shorts/DjS1o1BC6rU?si=SnFOXh6dsCxHKp37
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
Большой разговор о стратегии соцсетей для бизнеса с Радиком Юсуповым 75 минут ору в микрофон, что бизнесу не нужно делать контент, но нужно снимать порно с русалками. Youtube: https://youtu.be/miivyTxJMMo Rutube: https://rutube.ru/video/ca5447dafe6ed4346771698ba2fd668c/ ВК: https://vkvideo.ru/video-135926329_456239377 Дзен: https://dzen.ru/video/watch/69f64be8db22e333c4715fe3 Одноклассники: https://ok.ru/video/…
🔥9🤣2
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
Снова родил монстр-текст, на этот раз — для психологов: https://boosty.to/glvrdru/posts/8c366379-bf14-4013-a412-0009a5af8070 Что внутри: — Какими должны быть соцсети для психологов — Как привлекать через них клиентов в консультации — Как стать тем самым известным блогером, у которого все хотят получить автограф — Чего делать категорически не нужно, чтобы не потерять доверие клиентов — Нужно ли нанимать сммщиков? — «…
🔥9👏6❤1🕊1
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
Я родил монстр-текст: всё что нужно знать про соцсети для бизнеса: https://boosty.to/glvrdru/posts/02847e9e-06c0-4ef5-b5b2-bf32dfa2e274?share=post_link Считайте, что это краткая версия книги, но конкретно для компаний (а не для блогеров). Контент платный, входит в подписку «Вечеринка» на моем Бусти. Что внутри: — Главный рецепт счастливой жизни компании в соцсетях — Можно ли без них? — Актуальные каналы — Актуальн…
🔥14🍓5
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
🆕 Почему телеграм-канал не растет? Должен ли он расти? Что сделать, чтобы он рос? В новом видео рассказываю про две стратегии развития телеграм-каналов, от которых можно ожидать рост. Показываю двигатели каждой из них. Самое важное в видео — понимание законов природы и роста. Очень тяжело жить в постоянной фрустации, что канал не растет. Поэтому дух видео — успокаивающий. Скорее всего, вам не нужен миллион подписчи…
❤16👍3🔥2
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
⚡ Максим Ильяхов × Oktava Lab – как главред в студии Большую книгу о соцсетях озвучивал ✌🏻 Друзья и коллеги, всех приветствуем в рубрике История успеха. В ней мы рассказываем о кейсах, когда гости записывали что-либо у нас и выстреливали с этим. Сегодня поговорим о кейсе, который не просто выстрельнул, а захватил умы, сердца, заметки и чаты с коллегами 💬 🚬 Большая книга о соцсетях вышла в свет и сеть этой зимой, а…
❤14
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
Поддерживаю ребят, с которыми мы делали аудиоверсию книги
❤1
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
🆕 Мини-курс на Бусти: стратегии в соцсетях 13 видео и текстов о том, как разработать стратегию соцсетей для бизнеса; как строить воронку продаж; как ставить реальные бизнес-цели и добиваться их. Кто хочет много зарабатывать в соцсетях и оставаться востребованным специалистом — курс для вас: https://clickmy.ru/link/nc6UFI
❤13⚡5👍5
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
В этом сезоне я выпускаю книгу «Правок больше нет» — о том, как работать с клиентом и спокойно спать по ночам, не переделывая по миллиону раз. О деньгах, управлении проектом, правках и конфликтах с клиентом. Соавтор — Миша Розов, основатель и дизайн-директор Pinkman, это одна из топ-3 российских дизайн-студий. Книгу ждем ближе к декабрю. Подписывайтесь на канал книги, чтобы успеть к предзаказу: @pravok_book_2025
🔥49😁12❤8
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
Картинка со смыслом
😁41😭30👍3
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
А вы знали? https://music.yandex.ru/album/36372553
😎27🙏11❤6🔥5💯1
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
🔥 МАКСИМ ИЛЬЯХОВ О СОЦСЕТЯХ ДЛЯ БИЗНЕСА Суровая правда 2025 года: многие тратят сотни тысяч «на контент ради контента». А можно построить систему, которая реально приносит деньги. 📍 Как? Узнаете 24 сентября в 19:00 (МСК) Обсудим: ➖ Два типа бизнеса в соцсетях: кому что подходит. ➖ Мифы соцсетей: на что вас разводят SMM-специалисты. ➖ Разборы стратегий для бизнеса. ➖ Сколько реально стоит ведение соцсетей и ско…
❤17👎2
Signed Maxim Ilyahov
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @social_book. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 718,470 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Большая книга о соцсетях — Ильяхов, Скрябин” (@social_book), 3,174 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/social_book.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.