Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Даша про тексты и не только

@dasha_types

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

685subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001638604866
TypeChannel
Username@dasha_types
DescriptionПро тексты, маркетинг, нейросети и рост в профессии. Даша Илюхина, редактор @topvisorjournal. Учу писать, провожу консультации. Гайды https://app.lava.top/dasha_thinks Калькулятор копирайтера https://textprice.ru/ Связь @d_ilyukhina
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dasha_types

Growth

6857 Aug 2026, 16:09 — 685 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:30 — 685 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:098 Aug 2026, 02:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 684–686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:30685no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:09685first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 685 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (17 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total910
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,070
Videos
17
Links
572

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3522.6%
👍3522.6%
🔥2214.2%
🤣1711.0%
😁159.68%
❤‍🔥74.52%
💯74.52%
👏63.87%
🤝53.23%
🥰31.94%
🍓21.29%
🙏10.645%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC62 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Промпт надо на генерацию такой фигни всякой? Или вы уже все умеете?

🤣5👍4😁4👏1

Signed Даша Илюхина

3 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC82 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💖💅☀️ угадайте, что планирую делать в отпуске! в первый раз никуда не еду...

👏5🤝5😁3

Signed Даша Илюхина

31 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC118 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💯2

Signed Даша Илюхина

31 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У этой новости вайб как у видео ниже 👇👇👇

😁3

Signed Даша Илюхина

31 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC89 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @glvrdru

Нейроглавред теперь для всех Открываем в «Палиндроме» для всех клиентов нашу услугу нейроредакции и нейроредполитики. Это услуга для тех, у кого много людей пишет по-разному, а хочется единства и более высокого качества. Например, если у вас много продажников, которые пишут кто в лес кто по дрова; или если несколько маркетологов имеют разное видение текстов. Отдельный случай — если вы уже много раз заказывали в ра

😁5

Signed Даша Илюхина

30 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC90 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Апдейт — все оплатили, кроме неустойки. То есть можно (и наверное нужно?) требовать выплату за то, что оплата задержалась. Несколько выводов, которые я сделала из этого, с позволения сказать, кейса: • Работать надо по договору, как и делала всегда, но предлагать свою форму: где указаны комфортные мне сроки выплаты вознаграждения. • Если клиент присылает свой договор, читать внимательнее — так, у меня была указана не

👍54

Signed Даша Илюхина

24 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC158 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

рассылки в пинтерест, бессмысленные и беспощадные.

🤣12🍓2

Signed Даша Илюхина

14 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC236 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Этот день настал — пишем досудебную претензию клиенту 💅 Дано: заказчик, услуги которому оказаны, но оплаты не было. Есть уже сколько-то дней просрочки. Есть договор и подписанный акт. Что делать, кроме того, как заваливать заказчика сообщениями в духе «ну что там»? «Какие новости?». Если работа велась по договору (как я, надеюсь, вы все и работаете даже по всяким разовым задачкам), можно отправить досудебную претен

👍13❤‍🔥52

Signed Даша Илюхина

9 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC204 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Самая дурацкая фигня, которую можно представить — это ИИ-детекторы Заказчики просят копирайтеров проверить текст — написан ли он с помощью ИИ. Тут сразу проблема — какая заказчику разница, как исполнитель делает работу? Это как просить писать текст на компьютере определённой модели. Сразу хочется спросить: «вам шашечки или ехать?». Или ещё хуже — это как попытка залезть в голову и навязать способ делать задачу (а н

👍7💯52

Signed Даша Илюхина

2 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC217 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Публикаций в месяце было мало, но тем не менее #дайджест за июнь Как всегда, делюсь самым интересным, что вышло за месяц 💅 Крик души про переезды Анонс моего выступленя на Summer Merge — приходите Зачем крепить к промпту редполитику А что еще можно прикрепить к промпту? И вы делитесь своими лучшими постами за июнь!

🔥43

Signed Даша Илюхина

30 Jun 2026, 14:15 UTC191 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А что еще можно прикрепить к промпту? Если додуматься, конечно Да все, что угодно. Например, html-файл. Думаю, копирайтеры нередко скидывают в нейросеть ссылку с просьбой проанализировать ту или иную статью, и когда бездушная машина говорит им, что не может по той или иной причине открыть его — расстраиваются. А можно или скопировать текст по ссылке (но часто это не очень удобно, потому что статья может разбиваться

5❤‍🔥2👍2

Signed Даша Илюхина

26 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC229 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Совет, которому сама не всегда следую, но который 10/10 Если генерируете нейросетями текст, прикрепляйте редполитику к промпту. Промпт на хороший текст не всегда будет коротким (точнее — никогда не будет коротким). Иногда ну очень лениво делать нормально, но надо постараться. Скачать редполитику, попросить нейросеть ее проанализировать, или скопировать выдержки из нее и прислать вместе с просьбой написать текст —

6👍1

Signed Даша Илюхина

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dasha_types. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 928,110 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Даша про тексты и не только” (@dasha_types), 685 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dasha_types.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.