Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Digital-галера

@dgalera

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

18,812subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001356570845
TypeChannel
Username@dgalera
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dgalera

Growth

18,81218,86718,839.56 August 2026 — 18,867 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,857 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,856 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,854 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,853 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,833 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,821 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,812 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,804–18,875 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:5618,812-9
11 Aug 2026, 23:3518,821-12
11 Aug 2026, 01:1718,833-20
10 Aug 2026, 04:3518,853-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:5118,854-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:0318,856-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:4018,857-6
6 Aug 2026, 09:5018,863-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:0518,867first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.21%
avg views ÷ 18,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held21 (24 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total36,366
Reactions total572
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

509 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18937.1%
12424.4%
👍8817.3%
💯5711.2%
👏122.36%
🤝112.16%
🤯101.96%
🕊30.589%
😁30.589%
🙏30.589%
🤔30.589%
🫡20.393%
🍾10.196%
👌10.196%
🗿10.196%
🙊10.196%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 572reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dgalera. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC896 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Представьте: ваш клиент решил, что работа сделана наполовину, и заплатил в 2 раза меньше 🔵 А вот агентству Blacklight и представлять не надо. По их заявлению, они оказывали рекламные услуги Спортмастеру, работу сдали в полном объёме, но денег за неё получили меньше, чем должны были. В июне агентство пошло в арбитражный суд и потребовало остаток, почти 3 млн. Спортмастер отвечает, что вообще-то заплатил. Просто ''про

🤯10👍7🔥2🙏2🗿1

11 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,120 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Прочитайте это, прежде чем оставлять только одну услугу в агентстве 🔵В прошлом посте закончил на том, что в нашем агентстве из услуг мы оставили только одну – исследования. Рассказываю, чем это обернулось) Ставка выглядела логично. Работали мы в основном с корпоратами, а они заказывали исследования регулярно. У нас был один заказчик, которому мы за год отгрузили порядка 90 исследований. Каждый месяц собирали для ни

💯7🔥6👍41🙊1🙏1

11 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пока вы боитесь поднять чек, конкуренты уже это сделали А вы всё ещё называете клиентам сумму, которую озвучивали 2-3 года назад. Причина обычно не в расчётах. Причина в страхе: а вдруг текущие клиенты уйдут, если узнают новую цену? Проблема в том, что пока вы держите чек искусственно низким, вы платите за этот страх каждый месяц, недополучая с каждого проекта. В одиночку это решение принять тяжело, потому что не

🤝42👍2🔥2🍾1

10 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,260 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Партнёра в бизнес ищут примерно как жену или мужа 🔵 В этом посте рассказал, как мы отдали долю в агентстве по сути на честном слове. Обещал рассказать, как бы делал сейчас. Ловите 2,5 часть серии) Есть два подхода к тому, как заходить в партнёрство. Первый такой на вайбе: ''вроде нормальный чел, погнали работать''. Второй - это все эти партнёрские сессии. И я всегда топил за второй, а по факту зашёл по первому. И о

👍8💯7🔥21

8 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,520 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Продать агентство хотят многие, а к продаже их почти никто не готовит 🔵 ADWEEK вместе с Evros Group выкатили отчёт по сделкам за 2026 год: опросили владельцев независимых агентств, покупателей из холдингов и фондов, инвесторов. Больше половины владельцев готовы продаться. Желания на рынке больше, чем за последние годы, а до закрытых сделок при этом доходят единицы. У меня тут две мысли: Первая. Люди хотят выйти из

👍10💯74

7 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,450 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что такое эта ваша поддержка? На диджитал-рынке постоянно звучит услуга «поддержка сайта». Но на практике под словом «поддержка» подразумевают совершенно разные вещи. Сюда попадает гарантийная и постгарантийная поддержка, контентно-техническое сопровождение, ретейнер команды разработки. Сюда же иногда относят ответственность за то, чтобы сайт вообще работал. Путаница возникает потому, что одним словом называют три

👍5💯4🔥32👏2👌1🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,470 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Инструменты лидгена знают почти все — клиенты прибавляются у единиц Спросите любого владельца агентства, где брать клиентов, и он выдаст список: Директ, Авито, SEO, холодные рассылки, тендеры, сарафан и т.д. А потом наступает понедельник, и все они сидят с этим списком и не понимают, за что хвататься. Директ съедает бюджет и приносит клиентов, которые не готовы платить много. Холодные письма открывают, но больше нич

6💯5🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,510 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ссать, но делать — девиз моего блога 🔵 Периодически спрашивают, как не бояться выкладывать первый пост или ролик. Расскажу, как это было у меня) Вообще бояться проявленности — это абсолютно нормально, и у любого адекватного человека будет какой-то дискомфорт от выхода на большую аудиторию. У меня к моменту, когда я пошла в инстаграм*, уже был телеграм-канал, я долго его вела, плюс канал Галеры. Публичных выступлени

17👏8💯3😁3👍1

5 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,630 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Устали за 6 лет и отдали управление агентством 🔵 Это 2 часть серии постов про то, как мы с Наташей вернулись в агентство. Рассказываю, как мы вообще вышли из операционки. К февралю 2022-го агентству было 6 лет, мы раскачали его примерно до 30 млн выручки. SMM, маркетинг, трафик, комплексные проекты по 250–350к. Всё шло хорошо. Потом начались блокировки. Переводим клиентов в ВК, Дзен и видим, что результаты ужасные

13🔥12👍5🕊2👏1

4 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,600 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пока другие борются за каждый лид вхолодную, наши резиденты вживую знакомятся с клиентами Специально для наших резидентов организовали нетворкинг с бизнес-клубом «Эталон», чтобы обменяться опытом и взглядами на маркетинг и бизнес. С нашей стороны — владельцы агентств, с их — собственники бизнесов со средним оборотом 200 млн. в год. Начали с нетворкинга, его вела Юлия Магась, основатель PReach и резидент нашего клуб

9👍9🔥5👏1

3 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,710 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Подборка агентских мероприятий августа Сейчас проходит много полезных отраслевых мероприятий онлайн и офлайн, но времени их найти не всегда хватает. Поэтому мы решили собирать подборки интересных событий месяца и делиться ими с вами, чтобы вы могли запланировать полезные мероприятия. Стартуем с августа — сохраняйте себе и делитесь с коллегами, которым будет интересно. 7–8 августа, Калининград — БДД 2026 (бывшие B

8🔥5💯3

1 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,010 views26 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Почему Fix Price — это ловушка По данным PMI (Project Management Institute), средний большой IT-проект превышает бюджет на 45%, сроки на 7%, а выхлоп даёт на 56% меньше ожидаемого. В исследовании Harvard Business Review говорится, каждый шестой IT-проект обошёлся более чем на 200% дороже и вышел за сроки более чем на 70%. Люди плохо оценивают трудозатраты. Не учтены все внешние факторы, слишком оптимистично оценива

👍11💯74🫡2🤔1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @dgalera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@dgalera edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,328 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Digital-галера” (@dgalera), 18,812 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dgalera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.