Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7,277. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 792,503–801,964 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:14
793,595
-1,004
11 Aug 2026, 13:08
794,599
-1,228
10 Aug 2026, 14:02
795,827
-987
9 Aug 2026, 14:16
796,814
-1,240
8 Aug 2026, 12:33
798,054
-1,152
7 Aug 2026, 15:31
799,206
-1,122
6 Aug 2026, 12:01
800,328
-544
6 Aug 2026, 00:41
800,872
first reading
Engagement
603 posts held, back to 23 February 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 51 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.462%
avg views ÷ 793,595 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,670
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 603 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
603 (23 February 2023 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
22,020
Reactions total
554
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
293
Videos
67
Links
428
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,583 reactions across 16 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
494
31.2%
🔥
448
28.3%
👍
173
10.9%
👏
80
5.05%
🎉
73
4.61%
💯
44
2.78%
🐳
42
2.65%
🤩
38
2.40%
❤🔥
30
1.90%
🍾
28
1.77%
🏆
23
1.45%
🙏
18
1.14%
👌
14
0.884%
⚡
13
0.821%
🤝
11
0.695%
🆒
10
0.632%
🦄
9
0.569%
😘
7
0.442%
😍
4
0.253%
😎
4
0.253%
9 further kinds
20
1.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 552 of the 603 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 496,097reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 603 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2023 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 552 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hipofinance. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 603 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 February 2023 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚀 New Stats are now live in Hipo App!
Transparency has always been one of Hipo’s priorities. We believe users should have easy access to the data behind the protocol and be able to track its performance for themselves.
That’s why we’ve added a dedicated Stats section to the Hipo app, bringing live protocol and market data together with historical performance in one place.
You can now quickly access key figures inc…
🔥 Hipo has surpassed 8M GRAM staked!
Hipos, we’ve surpassed 8,244,000 GRAM staked on Hipo - a huge milestone for our community!
This achievement also moves Hipo to #4 on DeFiLlama, with both our TVL and ranking reaching an all-time high.
A massive thank you to everyone who has staked with Hipo, participated in governance, shared feedback, and supported the protocol along the way.
We’ll continue returning 100% of …
🚀 Hipo MCP Server is live!
Hipo is now AI-ready with our new Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server.
Developers and AI agents can now seamlessly query Hipo staking data through MCP-compatible tools, opening new possibilities for AI-powered DeFi experiences on TON.
With the Hipo MCP Server, you can build smarter agents, automate workflows, and bring liquid staking data directly into AI applications.
Imagine asking yo…
📊 About the APY spike (37.66%)
TL;DR: The 37.66% APY is a temporary effect caused by a large withdrawal mid-cycle. One validation round paid roughly double rewards, while the next round earns no rewards. Combined, this works out to about 17.3% APY, which is in line with Hipo's normal yield. APY will return to its usual ~17.5% range after the next participated validation round.
Quick explainer on the recent APY jump:…
📢 Latest Updates on Hipo
Hipos, over the past few days we've rolled out several improvements based on your feedback and suggestions:
1️⃣ Hipo Bot Improvements
We've upgraded the Hipo Bot to share key protocol metrics directly in Hipo Chat, including TVL, APY, and token prices. The data is refreshed every 30 minutes and posted daily to keep the community informed.
2️⃣ Rewards Display Fix
Thanks to a report from a H…
🎉 Hipo Reaches 4M GRAM Staked
Hipos, we've officially surpassed 4,000,000 GRAM staked in Hipo!
This is a historic milestone for our protocol and an incredible achievement for a community-built project powered by thousands of stakers, contributors, and HPO holders.
With the recently introduced waiting period for new stakes, Hipo APY is now more stable and currently stands at 20.34%, while Hipo continues returning 1…
⏳ Added a Waiting Period for Better APY
Hipos, based on your feedback, we’ve added a new feature to help keep APY more stable.
Now, any new GRAM staked in Hipo will wait until the current validation round ends — up to 18 hours — before receiving hGRAM and starting to earn staking rewards. This waiting time is now visible in the Hipo App.
During this cooldown period, stakers will receive an SBT, which will automati…
🚀 Hipo Reaches #6 on DeFiLlama on TON
Hipos, we just reached 3,988,927 GRAM staked and became the #6 protocol on TON by TVL on DeFiLlama.
We are only a few thousand GRAM away from reaching 4M GRAM staked — a historic milestone for Hipo.
This moment is special because we are reaching it together after years of building, improving, and growing as a community. We are also seeing more large GRAM holders choosing Hipo,…
🔥29❤15🐳11🍾7⚡3🎉3🤩3😘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 603 posts we hold for @hipofinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 56,408 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
20
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
20
vacant every time we have ever looked
@hipofinance named 20 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@guitiqui named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@omimiverse named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@samgil_arts1 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@smilessmileyy named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mahlex12 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@viptatinofresh named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@fayyyy_1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@hipoholder named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iamthedark named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ajdiuegehdu named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@javierito17 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jesustex named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mobiiizations named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@teethighson named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@internetcatz named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@boomteckzone named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@covenant411 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@crypt0_sader named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@daviess named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@esty57 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
POVEL DUREV / TON memecoin @poveldurev · 307,867 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Ton Raffles En Channel @tonraffles_en · 1,338,925 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Gram 🇪🇸 @toncoin_es · 205,712 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto kanishk chaudhary public group🌍 @cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 147,053 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Где деньги Криптовски @kriptovsky_drop · 150,762 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
17 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hipo” (@hipofinance), 793,595 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hipofinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.