Biggest gaming community on Telegram, powered by $GMEE token.
https://x.com/GAMEEHQ
To get all seriously important news
@gameetalk
To chat with others in the community
https://t.me/gamee
To play
https://bit.ly/collab-gamee-and-you
For collabs
Created
19 September 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 977 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 September 2020 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
130 measurements spanning 99 days, net -255,904. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,726,429–2,059,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 130
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 17:05
1,764,815
-3,019
11 Nov 2026, 10:44
1,767,834
-2,156
10 Nov 2026, 15:49
1,769,990
-1,200
9 Nov 2026, 14:59
1,771,190
-1,847
9 Nov 2026, 00:15
1,773,037
-2,240
8 Nov 2026, 05:19
1,775,277
-754
7 Nov 2026, 19:45
1,776,031
-2,539
6 Nov 2026, 22:10
1,778,570
-498
6 Nov 2026, 15:21
1,779,068
-1,774
5 Nov 2026, 22:15
1,780,842
-1,377
5 Nov 2026, 12:39
1,782,219
-1,412
4 Nov 2026, 21:05
1,783,631
-1,194
4 Nov 2026, 10:26
1,784,825
-1,525
3 Nov 2026, 22:54
1,786,350
-858
3 Nov 2026, 13:18
1,787,208
-1,444
2 Nov 2026, 22:07
1,788,652
-1,244
2 Nov 2026, 10:58
1,789,896
-935
1 Nov 2026, 20:49
1,790,831
-830
1 Nov 2026, 09:10
1,791,661
-977
31 Oct 2026, 23:29
1,792,638
first reading
Engagement
1,409 posts held, back to 19 September 2020 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,241 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.17%
avg views ÷ 1,764,815 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,600
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.719%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 1,409 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
1,409 (19 September 2020 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
247,470
Reactions total
1,779
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 02:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
617
Videos
56
Links
981
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
15s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 13 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 12 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2 days of being posted; a typical post has already reached 28.1% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 63.0% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 4,935 views — 0.28% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 5,650).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
14,132 reactions across 77 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,319
44.7%
😁
3,284
23.2%
👍
1,909
13.5%
🔥
1,645
11.6%
👏
311
2.20%
🥰
217
1.54%
🎉
181
1.28%
🙏
137
0.969%
🤩
129
0.913%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 925 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,192,607 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 September 2023 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
213
across the posts below
Posts paid on
58
of 925 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gameechannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 September 2023 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
71,800
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
113,000
over 924 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
errChipmunk
1
28 July 2025
28 July 2025
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 September 2023 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🟡 Gold Fest Season 2 | Wrapped
It’s been quite a ride since Nuggy picked up his pickaxe back in August. Here are the numbers you made happen! 😍
Your Season in Numbers:
😃 Players: 271,143
🎮 Gameplays: 16.4 million
🎁 Boxes opened: 5.6 million
🤩 Total distance dug: 740,400 km
🌟 Countries you played from: 195
📈 Average daily active players: 53,492
🍀 Draw winners: 5195
🔥 Read the full Season 2 Wrapped article on Mediu
😍 It's time to CLAIM!
Your Gold Fest rewards are ready for you to claim in the Dig It app. 🟡
Open Gold Fest and follow the link to Dig It – where you'll find that your Gold Points have converted to $NUGS. 🤩
📣 After that, be sure to join nGRND Gaming for important news on listing times, exchanges, vesting and tokenomics.
Thank you once again to everyone who played Gold Fest Season 2. 💣
😁 Claim!
💎 GRAM Giveaway – NOW!
Well, actually in fifteen minutes... 😉
How to win? 😮
Join our live episode of Signal Zero hosted by GAMEE Co-Founder Bozena Rezab, engage with the discussion and you might win a share of the $50 in $GRAM.
📣 Winners will be announced during the episode.
📱 Live on @GAMEEToken at 3 PM UTC
🚧 EDIT: Congrats to the winners – Rain, Sayrense and CS. Join the next Signal Zero episode for another ch…
It's almost over! 😤
Just 3 days until Gold Fest Season 2 wraps!
Enter the draws (including the Plush Pepe draw) and grab all the Gold you can. 💰
The end of the mine is near! 😍
🤩 One Last Dig
😃 Gold Fest Claim FAQs
Your most frequently asked claim questions – answered!
When does the claim begin?
The claim starts on November 4th. Open the Gold Fest app then and follow the instructions that appear.
What is the minimum amount I need to be able to claim?
There is no minimum amount.
What do I need to be able to claim?
You need a DSBT from nGRND. It doesn't matter whether it's a GAMEE-themed one or otherwis…
Who Won What? 🤗
The Gold Gift Draws are over, the Airpods have been received by the winner, and the new iPhone 17 draw will take place on Monday.
So here are the winners! Congrats! 🥳
✨ Gold Telegram Gifts #1:
• RezaBon – Input Key
• Daniel_w33 – Astral Shard
• Ripani93 – Loot Bag
• pv_reshid – Vintage Cigar
✨ Gold Telegram Gifts #2
• Jony9 – Swiss Watch
• nokiagram – Snoop Dogg
• Rzxoe – Liberty Figure
• Ahmed087…
Didn't catch the AMA on Monday? 🙄
Here's some of the info you missed:
🪙 The final Gold Fest prize pool is $1.5M in gold tokens.
🫴 Claims open shortly after the season ends, and will be done via Dig It. You need a DSBT.
⌨️ We'll need 2-5 days after the end of Season 2 to transfer data to Dig It – check here or on X for claim details.
💻 An announcement about the TGE for the rewards platform is expected in ~2 weeks…
📱Let's play... Who Wants an iPhone!
We've done the iPhone draw legitimately sooo many times. Most people we contact ignore us. Some don't believe it's real and block us. Some are bots (now banned!). One guy even sent us a picture of his, er... well, go figure. 😳
ʳᵉᵃˡˡʸ ˢᵐᵃˡˡ ᵇᵗʷ
So, good news – if you didn't win then now you have another chance! 🥳 ⬇️
🤩 If you would like an iPhone 17 with custom Nuggy case, are not…
😍 AMA + GIVEAWAY CODE TODAY!
When does Gold Fest end? Why do you need a DSBT? Why does Nuggy dig gold even though he is gold?! 😳
Whatever your question, ask it in our AMA on the @GAMEEToken X channel.
There'll also be a giveaway code. 🤩
▶️ Join here at 12:00 UTC
😃 EDIT: Finished! Thanks to all who joined. If you missed it, watch the AMA here.
😍 MEME CONTEST VOTE
Thanks to everyone who entered – scrolling through mountains of badly spelled AI slop that aren't even memes was a real pleasure for us. 🙃
Here are the finalists – the three that we think are 𝗍̶𝗁̶𝖾̶ 𝗅̶𝖾̶𝖺̶𝗌̶𝗍̶ 𝗍̶𝖾̶𝗋̶𝗋̶𝗂̶𝖻̶𝗅̶𝖾̶ the best! 😎
Take a look at each meme in the image, then vote for your favourite one. ✅
Prize Reminder
🥇 $50 USDT
🥈 $30 USDT
🥉 $10 USDT
❤61😁15🔥5🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,409 posts we hold for @gameechannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@gameechannel edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 September 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @gameechannel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
16
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
15
vacant every time we have ever looked
@gameechannel named 16 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@digitgoldgame named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@watcoin named in 18 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@animocabrands named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@uniswap named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@decentralgames named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mancity named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@arc8app named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@gbotsbygamee named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ikingperkins named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jeton_games named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@coolcatsnft named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mrmysteriouson named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@revv_token named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@stevengoos54599 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@bat339725491 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@elsavast named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Versia News @versiamusic · 19,194 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
Crypto Oxygen @CryptoOxygen · 27,590 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
GM News @kingygm · 41,478 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Banger Crypto Call @solmemecll · 44,698 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Upland Official Announcements @Uplandmeoffical · 46,263 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
HUSTLERS @hustlersweb3 · 21,838 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 September 2026
BossGo Community @mhaya_monopoly · 35,817 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
EdChess [ENG] @edchessss · 35,570 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
ℂ𝔸𝕋 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝕀ℕ𝔾 ℂ𝔸ℝ𝕋𝔼𝕃 🏆 @the_cat_cartel · 132,391 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Gomble Games @officialgomble · 121,954 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Gatto | Official Channel (18+) @gatto_game · 227,180 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Pumpkin | Community 🎃 @pumpkin_global · 22,440 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 September 2026
SafeFolioWallet ANNOUNCEMENT @SafeFolio · 65,944 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
Develocity Official Channel @DevelocityToken · 55,707 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Meme $PRETON @preton_meme · 116,714 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
PlayDeck EN @playdeck_en · 204,379 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
MOONBERG @moonbergai · 266,387 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
W3BFLIX Official @w3bflix · 625,707 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
WATCoin @watbird · 1,364,697 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
Quppy News @quppy_news · 20,121 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 September 2026
Conla News @Conla_news · 328,500 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
WebMind Network 🌐 @webmindnetwork · 23,091 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 September 2026
PoPP Official Channel @PoPPOfficial · 23,717 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 September 2026
$PIGGY PROJECT @piggycoinsol · 102,609 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 1,415 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
16 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GAMEE Community” (@gameechannel), 1,764,815 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gameechannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.