Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 100 days, net -324,488. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,911,256–2,333,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 07:20
1,959,929
-9,882
11 Nov 2026, 09:56
1,969,811
-4,351
9 Nov 2026, 18:00
1,974,162
-6,165
8 Nov 2026, 07:09
1,980,327
-5,044
7 Nov 2026, 02:10
1,985,371
-3,502
5 Nov 2026, 23:17
1,988,873
-3,659
4 Nov 2026, 22:54
1,992,532
-4,423
3 Nov 2026, 22:50
1,996,955
-3,784
2 Nov 2026, 19:27
2,000,739
-4,180
1 Nov 2026, 18:30
2,004,919
-7,516
31 Oct 2026, 16:21
2,012,435
-3,813
30 Oct 2026, 16:55
2,016,248
-4,374
29 Oct 2026, 15:08
2,020,622
-3,954
28 Oct 2026, 14:19
2,024,576
-2,875
27 Oct 2026, 17:48
2,027,451
-4,893
26 Oct 2026, 15:46
2,032,344
-2,325
25 Oct 2026, 15:36
2,034,669
-1,574
24 Oct 2026, 18:31
2,036,243
-3,273
23 Oct 2026, 20:06
2,039,516
-2,517
22 Oct 2026, 23:17
2,042,033
first reading
Engagement
157 posts held, back to 24 March 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.694%
avg views ÷ 1,959,929 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,600
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.779%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 157 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held
157 (24 March 2024 – 31 October 2026)
Views total
13,600
Reactions total
106
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
2 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
8,148 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,963
48.6%
👍
1,602
19.7%
🔥
670
8.22%
👀
568
6.97%
🎉
384
4.71%
🐳
293
3.60%
👏
150
1.84%
🤩
145
1.78%
💯
92
1.13%
🆒
84
1.03%
👌
74
0.908%
🏆
48
0.589%
🙏
42
0.515%
🤗
27
0.331%
⚡
6
0.074%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 157 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,647,937 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 157 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2024 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
113
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 156 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @the_vertus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 157 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2024 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🦔 Dear community 🦔
We’ve been building this for a long time, and it took much longer than we expected. But it was worth every day.
🚀 Vertus is now Hedgi, and we have released the most advanced wallet on the market.
🔐 Fully non-custodial.
Hedgi is built on MPC: your key is split into 3 parts, and any 2 are needed to sign. Hedgi holds only 1 of the 3. We can never move or control your funds. Nobody can, except you.
…
Vertus teases a custom black-and-green “Vertus Edition” concept in collaboration with Swatch × Audemars Piguet ahead of the highly anticipated “Royal Pop” release.
Dear community,
💎 Vertus Space support is officially live!
🚀 You can now use our dedicated support bot to ask questions, get assistance, and report any issues quickly and easily.
🤖 Simply open @VertusSpaceSupport_bot and type your message. Our team will review it and get back to you as soon as possible.
We’re continuing to improve Vertus Space every day — and this is just the beginning 🌐
X |Wallet | Space Market…
Dear community,
💎 We want your experience in Vertus Space to be smooth, simple, and enjoyable.
🚀 That’s why we’re working on launching a dedicated support where you’ll be able to ask questions, get help, and report any issues you may experience.
🤖 The support bot will be available in the next few days.
More improvements are on the way 🌐
X |Wallet | Space Market | Chat
⚠ Important Update
We are currently experiencing a very large volume of activity on Vertus Space following the launch.
🎁 Due to the high number of gift withdrawal requests, we are introducing a temporary withdrawal queue to ensure all transactions are processed safely and correctly.
🎁 Withdrawals may take longer than usual while the queue is active.
⚙️ Our team is already working on optimizing the system, and thi…
🚀 Vertus Space is officially LIVE!
Today we proudly celebrate the launch of Vertus Space — our new Telegram gifts marketplace where users can trade gifts with low fees and earn rewards for their activity.
✔️ The platform is now open and available to everyone.
Congratulations to our community, partners, and everyone who supported us on this journey — this launch wouldn’t be possible without you ❤️
🔗 Join now: http…
⚠ Deposit Task Clarification
We’ve received many questions about why the deposit task doesn’t work after sending a gift.
🎁 To complete the “Deposit a Gift” task in Vertus Space, you must send upgraded unique Telegram gifts only.
❗ Gifts with unlimited supply (such as ❤️ Heart, 🧸 Bear, and similar) will NOT be credited for the task.
Please make sure you are depositing a unique upgraded gift to successfully receive…
🚀 It’s been a long wait and it’s finally here.
🌐 We’re excited to announce the launch of our new major product: Vertus Space
A Telegram gifts marketplace where you can trade gifts with low fees and earn rewards for your activity.
🔗Join the bot and get early access: @vertus_space_bot
🗓 Release date: 16 Feb, 13:00 UTC
🔐 Pre-launch is live now
You can already access the app and take part before the official release:…
Happy New Year, everyone 🎉
We wish you happiness, good health, success, and new opportunities in the year ahead. May everything you’re working toward come true.
Thank you for being with us and supporting us along the way.
2026 will be even better for us — this is just the beginning.
Stay tuned 👀
A major announcement is coming very soon.
🌐 Dear community,
✔️ We’ve received many recurring questions recently — and we’re happy to answer them all below.
1️⃣ When was the TGE?
The Token Generation Event (TGE) took place on 17 January 2025.
2️⃣ Why was my in-game balance higher than what I could withdraw?
The total token supply was capped at 1.2 billion VERT.
Players collectively mined more than that amount, so a fair coefficient 4.67 was applied to …
❤321👍130🔥48👀30👌12👏10🤩10🆒10
Showing the 12 most recent of 157 posts we hold for @the_vertus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @the_vertus as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
1 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
6.6 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
32
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
31
vacant every time we have ever looked
@the_vertus named 32 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@mnk_inc named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 7 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@annik2207 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@barrymurphy_g named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@batllax named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@bethlehem_plasmic named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@brendaguerrero86 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@christopherflynn named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@coinaslani named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@congruism_fumigation named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@enunciators_soave named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@fourer_temple named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@i16799violet named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iedemir named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jessicayao110 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@liassotech named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@liemshiolong named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@lisayoung28 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@lme000 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@lpijzt named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@msapba named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@oqysik named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@poplars_triplocaulescent named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@prometei812 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@roterdam_plus named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@salomujjd named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@t_darkseid named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@thexcoinz named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@user_449091725 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@user_7427708445 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@van_ngo_2024 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ai375583 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@vansnns named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Blum: All Crypto – One App @blumcrypto · 12,712,250#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
A5 Investment Token - EN @investdmt · 138,467 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 29 August 2026
Closed @CryptoMillionaireNews · 39,840 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
BITTON - Engage. Earn. Scale. @bittonapp · 312,096 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
ToON News @toonorgnews · 77,008 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Kinds Announcement (Prev. Sphynx) @Kinds_ANN · 84,713 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
EdChess [ENG] @edchessss · 35,570 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
Pictographs.io | ENG News @pictographs_official · 83,898 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
WordBooX EN @WordBooX · 72,286 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto Whale Signals 🐋 @CryptoWhaleSignalsX · 100,086 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Cellula Official Announcement @Cellula_Official · 22,044 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
MemeTown News @MemeTownNews · 109,656 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Vanilla Finance News & Updates @vanillafinancenews · 997,109 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Pilot Community @HoldBull · 680,224 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
ZarGates Announcements @ZarGatesChannel · 125,179 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Official Livie Community | Announcement @LivieUpdates · 18,758 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
Danila Prozorov @danilaprobiz · 21,343 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Hexacore RU @hexacore_ru · 25,293 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
ARCOIN Official @arcoin_net · 52,817 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
Poolpays @poolpays_official · 31,053 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
? Community @SaveQuestion · 304,684 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
CryptoProIncome @Cryptoproincome · 33,490 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
Vameon @vameon · 44,464 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Develocity Official Channel @DevelocityToken · 55,571 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
PUNKS Announcements @WePunks · 96,385 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 1,542 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
5 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hedgi News (ex. Vertus)” (@the_vertus), 1,959,929 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_vertus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.