Не успели выпустить уже сжигаем
👍3❤2💯2😁2

Channel
@tonskuf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
124,699subscribers
-1,040 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002027385524 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonskuf |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonskuf |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 124,699 | -164 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 124,863 | -137 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 125,000 | -117 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 125,117 | -182 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 125,299 | -110 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 125,409 | -202 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 125,611 | -128 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 125,739 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
222 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 55 | 24.8% | |
| ❤ | 54 | 24.3% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 17.1% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 10.8% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 8.56% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 4.95% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 2.25% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 2.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.35% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.35% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.901% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.901% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 9 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonskuf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2025 to 9 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Не успели выпустить уже сжигаем
👍3❤2💯2😁2
File, posted without a caption
👍5💊2🔥2😁1
Примечательно, что для меня Snoop Dog ассоциируется с офигенной игрой Need For Speed и кавером на легендарныеThe Doors "Riders on the storm" Но самой массовой коллекцией решили сделать косяки шмали
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Пока BTC штурмует новые максимумы, Snoop Dog выпустил подарки на тоне и положил самый быстрый блокчейн. TON не смог выдержать наплыва и решил отдохнуть. Покупки Stars через фрагмент и ботов не работают, наблюдаем за ситуацией😎
🙈4❤🔥3💯2💔1
Заметил, что раньше криптаны чекали кошельки, через tonscan.org в поисках китов Теперь все чекают профили в Telegram, в поисках интересных коллекций
😁6❤5💯3
Если вы хотите продать или купить подарок - есть только одно приложение в Telegram. @Tonnel_Network_bot Все остальное даже близко не может приблизиться к Tonnel по безопасности, ликвидности, популярности.
🔥6❤5🤝4💯2
Коротко о том, что происходит в мире Telegram подарков. Есть маркет Фримана, который он сделал в одиночку. Без заведомо ложны обещаний, мам пап и кредитов. Есть другие проекты. Перечислять их здесь смысла нет никакого - дешевые продажные инфлы уже успели накормить вас своими реферальными ссылками.
👍4💯4🔥3❤2🤝1
MRKT потихоньку обнуляется После вчерашнего отключения вывода они забыли обновить очередь и в итоге проданные подарки ушли другим пользователям ➖➖➖➖➖➖ Вступить в 42 club giftstat.com
❤4🔥4😁4👍2🙈1
Мне не зашел новый разрекламированный маркет подарков, копируйте лучше в следующий раз Остаюсь с Фрименом
❤6👍4🔥2👏1💯1
Тайлер чем-то очень похож на Сатоши, тот тоже давал ультрабычьи сигналы по старкнет и ETH. Первый берет за свою аналитику 1500 USDT, второй 30% от вашего депо. Это какой-то позор
💯5🔥4👍3❤1
I feel sorry for those pathetic losers who bought Tyler's trading course for a f*cking 1,499$ to get a bullish signal for ETH 6 months ago 😁 PS: Just kidding, I don't feel sorry for pathetic losers 🚬 PS2: Good job Tyler, Shave them harder 🐹
👍6😁3🔥2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tonskuf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 694,945 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СкуфиТОН” (@tonskuf), 124,699 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonskuf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.