Channel
@num1_ch
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
420,480subscribers
-4,280 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002201985578 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @num1_ch |
| Description | Independent uncensored news 24/7 PR — @alexxx_dev |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/num1_ch |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 29% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 420,480 | -764 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 421,244 | -627 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 421,871 | -763 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 422,634 | -540 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 423,174 | -745 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 423,919 | -504 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 424,423 | -337 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 424,760 | first reading |
235 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 235 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 235 (6 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51,462 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @num1_ch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 235 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇷🇺📊 According to Cbonds data, by the start of August the number of unique bond defaults reached 61, comparable to the total number of defaults for all of 2025. The Association of Bond Holders (ABO) has pointed to gaps in the investor protection system. The ABO is advocating for the transfer of all debt securities cases to the Moscow Arbitration Court — Ъ
🇨🇳🇷🇺 Chinese companies have increased patent activity in Russia — Ъ
📉🇺🇸 Laggards post-earnings: 🇺🇸 CSCO Cisco = -4% 🇺🇸 CBRS Cerebras = -16%
🇷🇺📊 Russia's GDP estimate for Q2 exceeded projections from the Central Bank and the Ministry of Economic Development. Current Rosstat data does not yet allow for an explanation of such a notable discrepancy. — Ъ
⚠️🇨🇳 The US may use force against Cuba — Hegseth
🌎📊 Global unemployment among workers under 25 is rising. Young people are struggling to find their place. The deterioration of career prospects for youth is driven by insufficient job creation rates in economies, as well as their partial transformation due to AI technology adoption, according to an International Labour Organization (ILO) report.
🇷🇺🇨🇳 Russian businesses are increasingly choosing Chinese AI models. Market participants cite affordability, openness, and the ability to deploy them on-premises or in Russian clouds as the key reasons. — Ъ
🇷🇺🤖 Russian AI models will be required to undergo checks for spirituality and morality. The accreditation procedure for testing laboratories is currently being developed — FM
🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦 Russia and the US may soon resume active contacts on Ukraine. Moscow is ready to receive President Trump's special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner for new talks, with no obstacles to this, said Grigory Karasin, head of the Federation Council's international affairs committee. The main topic of a possible meeting could be new proposals that Kyiv has passed to Washington. However, exact dates for the Amer…
✴️ BTC spot trading volume has dropped to its lowest since 2019. Seller "exhaustion" indicators are approaching levels seen near previous bear market lows, but spot demand remains weak. A decline toward $58,000 is possible — Glassnode
🇷🇺💱 Putin stated that a strong ruble is creating problems for export companies
⚠️🇷🇺 Low demand for jewelry has caused a collapse in production — Izvestia
Showing the 12 most recent of 235 posts we hold for @num1_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@num1_ch edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 108,718 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 143 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“N1 Channel” (@num1_ch), 420,480 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/num1_ch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.