The biggest trading community.
Join and get free trading ideas every day.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/odes_ai
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/odes.community
📍Cooperation/Promo - @tf_work
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 97 days, net +330,173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 12:00
330,206
-549
9 Nov 2026, 20:27
330,755
-660
8 Nov 2026, 11:18
331,415
-508
7 Nov 2026, 08:40
331,923
-432
6 Nov 2026, 06:34
332,355
-461
5 Nov 2026, 06:45
332,816
-499
4 Nov 2026, 02:51
333,315
-436
3 Nov 2026, 00:06
333,751
-339
2 Nov 2026, 01:36
334,090
-456
31 Oct 2026, 23:04
334,546
-456
30 Oct 2026, 23:28
335,002
-515
29 Oct 2026, 21:56
335,517
-375
29 Oct 2026, 01:00
335,892
-575
27 Oct 2026, 20:20
336,467
-424
26 Oct 2026, 20:48
336,891
-353
25 Oct 2026, 18:27
337,244
-259
24 Oct 2026, 19:37
337,503
-483
23 Oct 2026, 16:55
337,986
-326
22 Oct 2026, 20:10
338,312
-600
21 Oct 2026, 16:47
338,912
first reading
Engagement
180 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.05%
avg views ÷ 330,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,480
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 180 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
180 (29 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
132,108
Reactions total
1,469
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 02:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,470
Videos
≈108
Links
≈2,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 20s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,498 reactions across 180 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
3,389
45.2%
❤
2,808
37.4%
👍
522
6.96%
😭
180
2.40%
🤝
107
1.43%
⚡
89
1.19%
🤯
72
0.96%
🤬
47
0.627%
👏
44
0.587%
🐳
39
0.52%
🤩
31
0.413%
👀
24
0.32%
😨
20
0.267%
🫡
18
0.24%
❤🔥
16
0.213%
🍾
16
0.213%
👌
15
0.2%
🕊
15
0.2%
🤓
12
0.16%
🏆
11
0.147%
4 further kinds
23
0.307%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 180 of the 180 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,498 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
72
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 180 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @odes_ai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 180 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (13.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔥 Meanwhile, my team and I have been busy trading!
Alongside gold, we’re trading US stock indices and currency pairs.
You can see our first results in the screenshots above.
I took my time choosing each trader in my team. I wanted people who could give you solid trade signals and clear analysis.
You can join the channel today and start trading with us.
🤝 Follow the link and fill out the form to get access.
⁉️ Why did I start trading gold?
You know how it goes. BTC won’t move, so you pull up ETH, then SOL, then five more charts. Half an hour later you’re still waiting on the same damn Bitcoin candle…
Last week, gold climbed nearly $200 an ounce while BTC finished lower.
🧐 And look at the chart above…
If you’d put $1,000 into each at the start of 2025, you’d have ended the year with $1,645 in gold and $937 in BTC.
T…
🥇 Most of you picked GOLD yesterday. Let’s trade the next move together.
When BTC goes sideways, I look for setups in gold and write about it in my GOLD channel.
• Daily breakdowns — the zones I’m watching and what would get me in.
• Trade signals — my entry, stop and profit targets.
• Live updates — when I take profit or move my stop to breakeven.
Today’s breakdowns for NAS100, NZD/USD and XAU GOLD are already up…
🪙 BTC's decline has prompted short-term holders to move 47,300 BTC ($3.5B) at a loss over the past 24 hours (CryptoQuant).
📈 This metric tracks transfers, not actual trades. However, moving BTC to exchanges usually indicates preparation to sell, so some of these coins have likely already been sold, while others may still be waiting to be sold.
Which positions are you currently in?
🔥 — Short
❤️ — Long
🔗Join VIP Gr
🩸BTC just closed its fifth red week in a row. With crypto selling off, I’ve started trading gold alongside it.
While I wait for BTC or ETH to hit my levels, gold gives me more setups to trade and share with you.
Gold still looks bullish to me on the 4H chart. Today’s US inflation number came in hotter than expected, the dollar climbed and gold pulled back. I want to see buyers step in on this dip. If they do, I’ll …
25% off challenges? Looks like I'm getting another one 😈
Barely recovered from the Instant Funding launch, and Hash Hedge already has another treat for us 🔥
On November 10 and 11, $10K, $25K and $50K challenges are 25% cheaper
And the part I care about most: the first payout comes in just 5 days 💳
I was planning to grab one more account anyway, so I saved without even trying, thanks 😎
On top of that, there’s a g…
⛏ I hope you listened to my Ethereum analysis and managed to protect your funds throughout this entire selloff. Even better, I hope you made money and are now waiting for an interesting zone to start building a long position.
I only share more precise entry levels in our private community, so you're more than welcome to join us. Let's trade together and take profits from this market together https://odes.trade/ 💰
A…
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 The U.S. Treasury will buy back up to $95 billion worth of its own government bonds over the next 3 months.
This injects new liquidity into the financial system, which is bullish for the markets.
Are we expecting a rally or another drop first?
🔥 — UP
❤️ — DOWN
🔗Join VIP Group
❗️Bill Gates calls for higher taxes on billionaires
Otherwise, AI will make the rich even richer while leaving everyone else without support.
According to him, voluntary philanthropy can't replace government guarantees.
Gates himself has pledged to give away almost his entire fortune by 2045.
Do you think this is the right move?
🔥 — YES, absolutely.
❤️ — NO, I disagree.
📉 The combined wealth of the world's 500 richest people dropped by $185 billion in a single day ❗️
🪣 According to Bloomberg, this was the 14th-largest single-day decline since the index was launched in 2012.
Meanwhile, the market cap of the Magnificent 7 fell by $1 trillion 📉
What do you think? Is it time to buy the dip, or are we heading even lower?
🔥 — Now's the time to stop being afraid and start buying.
❤️ — …
Did Hash Hedge Just Decide to Hand Out Funded Accounts? 😳
The guys launched Instant Funding for 48 hours, and the conditions are seriously good
Instead of going through evaluation stages, you get a ready-to-trade Funded account immediately after purchase
Here's everything you need to know 👇
📈 You only need 5 profitable days, with at least 0.25% profit
📅 Choose your own payout period: 14 to 60 days
🛡 Drawdown limi…
📈 take a look at yesterday's ETH and BTC breakdowns. as you can see, my long areas of interest are lower, and price is moving toward them.
more precise entry levels have already been posted in our odes alpha private community.
what would you like to break down today?
🔥 — SOL
❤️ — ONDO
👍🏻 — VVV
🔥13❤5👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 180 posts we hold for @odes_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@odes_ai edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 October 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ODES → Trading @trading_odes · 20,944 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 September 2026
HamsterChain News @hamsterchainann · 24,452 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 September 2026
Udaku O'clock @eliking_m · 27,814 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 8 September 2026
UCHE CRYPT @uchecrypto · 30,068 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
Kong's Jungle Room @KongsJungleRoom · 115,067 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
BJW Trades @Everydaywealthupdate · 36,601 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
ODES → Breaking News @odes_news · 81,794 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Mr Bitcoin Trade @mr_bitcoin_trade · 137,645 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
SleekTru - Crypto Channel @makemoneywithsleektru · 29,554 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 September 2026
CryptoFlash⚡️— blockchain, news, investments @cryptoflash_news · 216,328 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 17 September 2026
Controverity @controverity · 41,765 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Ton Gems @T0N_Gems · 60,320 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
IndosTv 🦅 @indosTv · 21,669 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 22 September 2026
🐹 Hamster Kombat 2 @combathamstercipher · 26,044 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 September 2026
CC Crypto Tips @CC_Crypto_Tips · 104,005 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
Master of Crypto @mastercryptohq · 256,203 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
MoC Airdrop💰 @MoC_Airdrop · 27,656 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Sky Sports Football | Soccer @TheFootballCity · 242,107 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Nnamdi’s Playbook @blazenation · 23,415 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
Crypto Mason @cryptomasun · 28,121 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
BRN Metaverse Announcements @BrnTokenAnnouncementss · 27,040 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Hamsterians @hamsterianss · 55,064 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
ABLY Drops 🪂 @ABLYDrops · 35,774 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026
PAWS COMMUNITY NEWS @pawsfamnews · 47,102 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 322 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ODES → All about trading” (@odes_ai), 330,206 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/odes_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.