Thank you for participating in our survey! We are currently working hard on the new project, and it will be available to you soon. Please note that the final airdrop will take place alongside this event. 🫡
🔥5,330

Channel
@rockyrabbitio
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,240,555subscribers
-504,565 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002175376866 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rockyrabbitio |
| Description | Play, Earn, Repeat. 🎮🐰 Start Now @rocky_rabbit_bot If you can not join click on below link 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/addlist/3us6gegQ0BsyZWMx Community chat: https://t.me/rockyrabbitio/69 instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rockyrabbitio/ |
| Created | 21 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rockyrabbitio |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @rockyrabbitio/71 · this entry14 Jul 2024, 14:56 UTC | @Rocky_rabbit_Office/6614 Jul 2024, 15:20 UTC | 1.00 | 25 minutes |
| @rockyrabbitio/80 · this entry28 Jul 2024, 17:35 UTC | @Rocky_rabbit_Office/9628 Jul 2024, 17:46 UTC | 1.00 | 11 minutes |
| @rockyrabbitio/81 · this entry28 Jul 2024, 17:35 UTC | @Rocky_rabbit_Office/9728 Jul 2024, 17:47 UTC | 1.00 | 12 minutes |
| @rockyrabbitio/83 · this entry30 Jul 2024, 09:13 UTC | @Rocky_rabbit_Office/10030 Jul 2024, 11:24 UTC | 1.00 | 2.2 hours |
| @rockyrabbitio/75 · this entry18 Jul 2024, 11:45 UTC | @Rocky_rabbit_Office/7618 Jul 2024, 11:47 UTC | 0.99 | 2 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Rocky_rabbit_Office | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 25 minutes | this entry (9–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 74 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 June 2024 to 5 February 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @rockyrabbitio — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 18:52 | 3,240,555 | -6,609 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 00:19 | 3,247,164 | -6,484 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:48 | 3,253,648 | -6,747 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:39 | 3,260,395 | -4,224 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 3,264,619 | -5,592 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:10 | 3,270,211 | -4,311 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:14 | 3,274,522 | -4,783 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:59 | 3,279,305 | -5,110 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:48 | 3,284,415 | -4,471 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:29 | 3,288,886 | -5,021 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 3,293,907 | -5,940 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 3,299,847 | -4,390 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 3,304,237 | -5,144 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:39 | 3,309,381 | -5,329 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 3,314,710 | -5,255 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 3,319,965 | -2,148 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:39 | 3,322,113 | -3,137 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 3,325,250 | -6,085 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 3,331,335 | -5,001 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 3,336,336 | first reading |
103 posts held, back to 21 June 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 103 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
171,060 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 171,060 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,010,250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2024 to 5 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rockyrabbitio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 103 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2024 to 5 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Thank you for participating in our survey! We are currently working hard on the new project, and it will be available to you soon. Please note that the final airdrop will take place alongside this event. 🫡
🔥5,330
Which event will happen first by the end of January? 🧐 1 billion RabbitCoin will be shared among 10 winners who guess correctly!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥4,110
Rocky Rabbit Channel pinned a video
🔓 Exciting update! The fourth vesting has been unlocked for Rocky Rabbit’s players! If your tokens are still locked, simply participate in one of the games to activate the unlock. Please note that due to the high volume of withdrawals during monthly unlock periods, withdrawals may be delayed. Don’t miss out on making the most of your holdings! 🐰
🔥3,310
🎮 How to Play IQ Rabbit 🐰 Predict the price of Bitcoin and win big in this exciting game! 📈 Simply forecast where the price will go, and if you're right, you'll claim the rewards. 💰 You can use major cryptocurrencies from the TON network to play, making it even easier to get started and earn while you game. 🤑🤑🐶🐹🐰 Test your prediction skills today and see if you can outsmart the market! 🏆
🔥9,920
🐰 Top Rocky Rabbit players are raking in thousands of dollars! 🐰 Are you part of this elite group yet? Play now and see if you can join the leaderboard! 🎮💸 🐰 Rocky Rabbit – the only true Play-To-Earn on the TON network!
🔥5,430
🐰Take a look at who’s leading the pack on CoinGecko this time around! 📈
🔥4,070
🐰 Top Story on news.BITCOIN.COM: Rocky Rabbit Takes the Spotlight! Dive into the world of $RBTC where gaming meets blockchain innovation.
🔥2,340
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥1,810
🐰Exciting update! The first vesting has been unlocked for Rocky Rabbit’s token holders! If your tokens are still locked, simply participate in one of the games to activate the unlock. Don’t miss out on making the most of your holdings! 🐰💥
🔥3,140
🎮 How to Play IQ Rabbit 🐰 Predict the price of Bitcoin and win big in this exciting game! 📈 Simply forecast where the price will go, and if you're right, you'll claim the rewards. 💰 You can use major cryptocurrencies from the TON network to play, making it even easier to get started and earn while you game. 🤑🤑🐶🐹🐰 Test your prediction skills today and see if you can outsmart the market! 🏆
🔥6,810
⚡ Exciting News! Deposits for popular TON network tokens are now live on Rocky Rabbit! You can now deposit RBTC, TON , HMSTR, DOGS, and NOT to enhance your gameplay and compete with others. 🤑🤑🐶🐹🐰 Jump into the action and start earning today!
🔥13,900
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @rockyrabbitio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which event will happen first by the end of January? 🧐 1 billion RabbitCoin will be shared among 10 winners who guess correctly!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2024 to 5 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rockyrabbitio named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rocky Rabbit Channel” (@rockyrabbitio), 3,240,555 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rockyrabbitio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.