⚡️ TONCO V2 is live. The new generation of pools is now live & processing trades. Identical v1.0 pools are being phased out: ⏸️ Trading will be disabled 💸 They will no longer generate fees If you still have liquidity in v1.0 pools, migrate it to TONCO V2 using the built-in Migrator 👇 app.tonco.io/#/position-migrator Learn more about TONCO V2 here.

Channel
TONCO
@tonco_io
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,581subscribers
-217 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002227506038 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonco_io |
| Description | Next-Gen DEX on TON with Concentrated Liquidity for better capital efficiency | MAINNET IS LIVE: app.tonco.io | @tonco_dex_bot | Our links: @tonco_welcome | Collab inquiries: @chtoachev0 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonco_io |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 27,581 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 27,606 | -30 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 27,636 | -39 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 27,675 | -28 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 27,703 | -29 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 27,732 | -45 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 27,777 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 27,798 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 27,798 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.39%
- avg views ÷ 27,581 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 383
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.43%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 March 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,148 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 704
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 646
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 41.3% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 25.4% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 19.0% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 6.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
TONCO pinned «⚠️ TONCO Maintenance Update During the v2 rollout, and until further notice: ⏸️ Swaps & liquidity provision are temporarily paused on several v1 pools. ✅ Liquidity withdrawals remain available at all times. We’ll keep you updated & let you know as soon…»
⚠️ TONCO Maintenance Update During the v2 rollout, and until further notice: ⏸️ Swaps & liquidity provision are temporarily paused on several v1 pools. ✅ Liquidity withdrawals remain available at all times. We’ll keep you updated & let you know as soon as everything is back online. Thanks for your patience!
👍2
TONCO v2 is here ⚡️ New-gen CLAMM pools are live, now default for all new pools & positions: → upgradable contracts → safer transfers & failure handling → cheaper multi-hop swaps → foundation for ALM Audited by Trail of Bits. Learn more: docs.tonco.io/en/overview/tonco-v2.0.html
❤6👍3👌2
$TONCOIN is now $GRAM – renamed & live for trading on TONCO. Check out $GRAM now 👇 app.tonco.io/#/pools ⚠️ Beware of scams: no action is required. Ignore any links or bots asking you to move, verify, or claim assets related to the TON → GRAM update.
❤1
The tip is green 🤠 app.tonco.io/#/explore
❤🔥2💯1
Looking for the deepest $tsTON / $USDT liquidity on TON blockchain? 🫦 The biggest Tonstakers pool is hosted on TONCO with $4.3M TVL, $1.9M trading volume & 167% APR. 👇 Make your liquidity work on $TON’s first V3 DEX, here.
TON ECOSYSTEM TVL REVIEW Here’s an overview of the Ton ecosystem with it's leading projects by TVL. Tonstakers leads with $168.9M in total value locked, followed by STONfi with $33.18M and Stakee with $28.16M. #Tonstakers #STONfi #Stakee #EVAAProtocol #DeDust #Affulent #TONCO #StormTrade #UTONIC Socials: X | Telegram | LinkedIn
👍2❤1🔥1
Here are the winners of the TONCO x Tonstakers $tsTON Yield Campaign 🌊 1️⃣ Top-3 LP providers split the $300 prize pool: • EQBX...UvHD • EQBv...CV7BJ • EQDV...rO-kE 2️⃣ 20 LPs splitting the $200 reward pool can be found here. Rewards have been distributed yesterday – check your wallet addresses. Congrats to everyone & thanks for surfing the wave with TONCO 🤝
🔥2
💎 Put your tsTON to work on TONCO – TON’s first V3 DEX. Stake $TON via Tonstakers, LP in the $tsTON / $USDT pool & farm up to 92% APR + extra rewards from the TONCO × Tonstakers campaign 🌊 🏆 $500 rewards pool: • $300 for Top-3 LPs • $200 shared between 20 random users Keep your position open until May 15, 13:00 UTC & get rewarded! Stake here LP here
👍2❤1🔥1
$TON revival hits different when your fave V3 DEX keeps hitting new ATHs 🌊 350k+ transactions is now processed via TONCO. Trade, LP & surf the wave on TONCO 🌱 app.tonco.io
🔥3👍1
💧 Park your tsTON where it actually works. TONCO 🤝 Tonstakers are launching a 7-day LP campaign for those who prefer their yield boosted & stacked. What’s up for grabs? 🔵 $300 for the top 3 LP chads 🔵 $200 split across 20 random participants How to join: 1️⃣ Stake 20+ $TON on Tonstakers & receive $tsTON 2️⃣ Add liquidity to the tsTON/USDT pool on TONCO 3️⃣ Keep the position active until May 15, 13:00 UTC 4️⃣ Get u…
🔥2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonco_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 150,071 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@tontonminiapp · 32,5124 postsTONCO Welcome!
@tonco_welcome · 5,2383 postsAlex_tuha
@alex_tuh · 191 postGram of TON
@gram · 7,028,2511 postHipo
@hipofinance · 792,5881 postThe Open League
@league · 1,052,2151 postSORATOPIA - Anuncios
@soratopiaspanish · 71 postTonstakers
@thetonstakers · 947,8391 postxDelta
@xdelta_finance · 6471 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TONCO” (@tonco_io), 27,581 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonco_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.