New GOATS Loading... █████████░ 90% https://x.com/GOATS_immortal/status/2021064806871204328?s=20 🐐 Join GOATS | 📱 GOATS X
❤535👍238🦄63🔥55🤯41🎉35👌3

Channel
@realgoats_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
5,057,045subscribers
-73,076 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002195784668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @realgoats_channel |
| Description | Prediction on $TON💎 🐐 Channel: @realgoats_channel X: https://x.com/GOATS_immortal Grab some $GOATS: @realgoats_bot Partnership: @GoatJune1 Support: @j0se_junior Beware of scammer! |
| Created | 21 July 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/realgoats_channel |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 5,057,045 | -14,344 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 5,071,389 | -12,976 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 5,084,365 | -10,452 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 5,094,817 | -10,308 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 5,105,125 | -10,132 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 5,115,257 | -10,274 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 5,125,531 | -4,590 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 5,130,121 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 5,130,121 | first reading |
647 posts held, back to 21 July 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,020 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 647 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
11,116 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4,225 | 38.0% | |
| ❤ | 3,956 | 35.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1,538 | 13.8% | |
| 🤯 | 525 | 4.72% | |
| 🦄 | 406 | 3.65% | |
| 👌 | 234 | 2.11% | |
| 🎉 | 232 | 2.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 643 of the 647 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,049,885reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 647 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2024 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @realgoats_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 647 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2024 to 10 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
New GOATS Loading... █████████░ 90% https://x.com/GOATS_immortal/status/2021064806871204328?s=20 🐐 Join GOATS | 📱 GOATS X
❤535👍238🦄63🔥55🤯41🎉35👌3
GOATS - The only TON-native prediction market Rebuilt, sharper, and almost ready to play again. Check out our Article on X 👇 https://x.com/GOATS_immortal/status/2016049740224573529 🐐 Join GOATS | 📱 GOATS X
❤868👍397🔥164👌66🤯38🦄37🎉35
To cater the best TON-native Prediction to users on TON ecosystem, we'd like to understand what is more convenient for you to trade in. Not overthinking it, what currency feels better for you?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤203👍72🤯32🦄17👌11🔥11🎉8
Ready for GOATS comeback? The only TON-native Prediction Market 🐐 Join GOATS | 📱 GOATS X
❤397👍176🤯79🔥51👌25🦄19🎉9
GOATS BURN COMPLETED The fire doesn’t stop. Another week, another $GOATS supply cut. The latest burn is complete, fewer with fewer supply, stronger in community. 🔥 BURN STATS: - $TON Buyback Burn: 16,036,114.07 $GOATS (avg price: $0.00007) - $GOATS Revenue Burn: 6,806,142.90 $GOATS - Total Burned: 22,842,256.98 $GOATS - Supply After Burn: 19,521,472,169.24 $GOATS 💀 BURN PROTOCOL: 1️⃣ $TON-fueled buybacks keep melt…
❤690👍264🤯121🔥75🦄60👌58🎉21
GOATS EVENT: GOATS CATCHING BOOMED! Time to level up your Catching game BIG time! 1 Week from now to get your bag full with Catching in GOATS 🐐🐐🐐 We BOOSTED the Catching Rewards and it’s PURE🔥: 💣 3 Bombs = 10% Reward Boost 💣 2 Bombs = 9% Reward Boost 💣 5 Bombs = 7% Reward Boost Catch and keep stacking that $GOATS 🐐 Join GOATS | 📱 GOATS X
👍354❤249🔥61🎉35👌25🤯23🦄21
GOATS IS COOKING AGAIN 🔥 You thought we were chillin’? NAH. GOATS is back on full degen mode with fresh plays, spicy rewards, and another round of BURNS to light up the timeline. Let’s break it down 👇 🏆Champions League Final Prediction Market Think you know ball? Prove it and place your bet 🧠💰 👀 New Event dropping with a Mini-Game Guess which one... or just wait and get REKT 🔥🔥AND YES… we BURNIN’ AGAIN Another …
👍235❤133🦄32🤯19🔥12🎉11👌10
GOATS 15th BURN COMPLETED The blaze continues. Another week, another supply cut. The 15th $GOATS burn is done, slashing circulating tokens with the highest commitment to our community. 🔥 BURN STATS: • $TON Buyback Burn: 11,463,876.07 $GOATS (avg price: $0.0001047) • Revenue Burn: 7,819,882.98 $GOATS • TOTAL BURNED: 19,283,759.05 $GOATS • SUPPLY AFTER BURN: 19,575,632,097.43 $GOATS 💀 BURN PROTOCOL: 1️⃣ $TON-fueled …
🔥180👍153❤108🎉25🤯13🦄13👌12
GOATS Spinning Fiesta: Edge Cracked, Wins Buffed 🎯 GOATS is BACK and spinning harder than ever. For 1 WEEK ONLY — earn MORE in Spinning with boosted wins and nerfed edge. 💸 What’s New: 🔥Edge sliced: 2% ➜ 0.5% (House crying, you winning.) 🔥Max Wins BUFFED: ▪️ Easy: 1.8 ➜ 1.85x ▪️ Medium: 3 ➜ 3.5x ▪️ Hard: 9.9 ➜ 9.95x Note: other small prizes will also have an increase 💥 Every spin hits differently this week. 🐐Jo…
👍226❤82🤯19🦄9🎉7🔥2
GOATS 14th BURN COMPLETED THE INFERNO WON’T STOP. Another week. Another supply massacre. The 14th $GOATS BURN has landed — and it’s straight carnage. 🔥 BURN STATS: • $TON Buyback Burn: 4,353,340.77 $GOATS (avg: $0.00009044) • Revenue Burn: 4,367,635.11 $GOATS • TOTAL BURNED: 8,720,975.88 $GOATS • SUPPLY AFTER BURN: 19,607,042,310.93 $GOATS 💀 BURN PROTOCOL: 1️⃣ $TON-fueled buybacks keep melting the chart. 2️⃣ 100% …
👍402❤100🔥60🦄21🤯13🎉1
GOATS PREDICTION MARKET: CHAMPIONS LEAGUE QUARTERS — FINAL 2ND LEG ⚔️ The GOATS Prediction Market just dropped 4 🔥 new Champions League clashes. This ain’t your average matchday. It’s blood. It’s sweat. It’s bags on the line. 💰 Are you a tactical genius or just a full-send maniac Predict. Trade. Print. 💸 ⚽️ THE CHAOS LINEUP 1️⃣ Real Madrid 🆚 Arsenal 2️⃣ Inter 🆚 Bayern 3️⃣ Aston Villa 🆚 PSG 4️⃣ Dortmund 🆚 Barcelon…
👍205❤55🔥21👌11🦄11🤯7
GOATS PREDICTION MARKET: CHAMPIONS LEAGUE QUARTER-FINALS – 1ST LEG ENDED 🔥 All 4 matches just wrapped... Drama. Goals. Chaos. And some BIG winners in the arena 🧠⚽️💰 Prediction Market closed. The results are in. Did you cook or get cooked? ➡️ Check the outcome now. ➡️ Flex if you nailed it. Cope if you didn’t. Next round coming FAST. Join and claim FREE $GOATS 🐐 Join GOATS | 📱 GOATS X
👍195❤64🤯19🎉8🦄3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 647 posts we hold for @realgoats_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
To cater the best TON-native Prediction to users on TON ecosystem, we'd like to understand what is more convenient for you to trade in. Not overthinking it, what currency feels better for you?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 647 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2024 to 10 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 175,380 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@realgoats_channel named 44 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 517 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GOATS Channel” (@realgoats_channel), 5,057,045 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realgoats_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.