Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 222 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 July 2024 to 12 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @wizzwoods_game. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -30,261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,092,892–2,132,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:34
2,097,431
-6,485
11 Aug 2026, 08:43
2,103,916
-5,092
10 Aug 2026, 11:52
2,109,008
-2,685
9 Aug 2026, 12:32
2,111,693
-4,702
8 Aug 2026, 15:23
2,116,395
-4,719
7 Aug 2026, 17:15
2,121,114
-4,041
6 Aug 2026, 17:50
2,125,155
-2,537
6 Aug 2026, 01:30
2,127,692
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:00
2,127,692
first reading
Engagement
325 posts held, back to 26 June 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,006 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 325 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
253
Videos
32
Links
144
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,255 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,281
56.8%
❤
450
20.0%
🤔
162
7.18%
👍
143
6.34%
🔥
80
3.55%
😱
48
2.13%
👏
37
1.64%
👀
30
1.33%
💋
13
0.576%
🍾
6
0.266%
👌
4
0.177%
💯
1
0.044%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 310 of the 325 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 619,435reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 325 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2024 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 310 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tabi_ann. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 325 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2024 to 12 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Tabi v3 Update: Strengthening Security, EVM Compatibility, Node Delivery, and Observability
Since the beginning of 2026, the development focus of Tabi v3 has gradually shifted from foundational code contributions to a more production-oriented phase.
The latest iterations focus on five key areas: security hardening, EVM compatibility, node delivery, cross-platform releases, and observability. Together, these upgrade…
Tabi would be at the 2026 AI Convergence Event, Hong Kong 🇭🇰
Our team would be amongst a co-host lineup that includes names such as BIhelix, Infini, Sentient and more.
Bixin Ventures and Tron, the hosts, are bringing together AI builders, Web3 founders, and investors to talk about one thing: moving from concept to real adoption in crypto.
At this one-day event hosted, you'll hear firsthand how AI projects find pr…
AI × Crypto is entering a new era.
We are hosting a special Founders’ Talk on:
2026 AI × Crypto Thesis: The Agent Economy
As AI agents evolve from content engines to economic actors, the next question is clear:
how will they earn, transact, and operate at scale?
https://x.com/0xinfini/status/2038197299147370707?s=46
Over the past two weeks, we’ve pushed more than a new contract or SDK release.
We’ve been advancing the ERC-8192 proposal, turning Mandated Execution for Tokenized Vaults (ERC-4626) from a spec discussion into an execution layer that agents, apps, and wallet flows can actually integrate.
At its core, this is not about making agents more powerful.
It’s about making them operate within user-defined risk boundaries
h…
Important Notice: TabiCard Holders Must Cancel Subscriptions & Remove TabiCard as a Payment Method
As TabiPay has entered its shutdown phase, TabiCard will no longer support subscription / recurring billing charges (including, but not limited to memberships, app subscriptions, cloud services, software subscriptions, and game subscriptions).
To avoid service interruptions, repeated failed charge attempts, or future …
Payments shouldn’t feel like paperwork.
We’re here for the moments that matter: fast, simple, human.
https://x.com/TabiPayHQ/status/2013885853786104193
New Tabi logo.
Same mission.
Stronger symbol.
We refine intensity, even anger, into focus, action, and outcomes.
Not impulse. Fuel.
😁142❤49🤔16👏10🍾4👍3💋3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 325 posts we hold for @tabi_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 175,207 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
17
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
17
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tabi_ann named 17 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@din370541 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@akcb_ron named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@tabibangladesh named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@momoxu7 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@token2049 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ihuisang5 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@morpholabs named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@normanrockon named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@nounsgg named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@polyflow_payfi named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tabichainkr named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tabizenvn named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@will_7th named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@charis_em named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@davidteng650614 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@debuho1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@gogogonum named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Blum: All Crypto – One App @blumcrypto · 15,640,039#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wizards Island @wizzwoods_game · 1,312,699 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
DRFT Party Announcement @drft_party · 157,372 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
AKEDO News @akedofun · 1,423,019 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
HABIT AI Network🐨 @habitnetwork · 249,222 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Banana Announcement @banana_update · 1,478,718 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
Wave Announcements @wave_announcements · 774,705 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Matchain Fam @matchain_fam · 2,087,030 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 August 2026
EVEDEX @OfficialEveDex · 447,967 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
WAGMI HUB | News 🗞 @WagmiHub_News · 1,135,101 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
CryptoRank tApp News @CR_tApp · 272,940 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Not Bored Puppies news (Ex-Topcoin) @notboredpuppies_news · 1,211,321 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Athene Network Announcement @AtheneNetwork_Ann · 762,987 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
HERE Wallet @herewallet · 1,174,978 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
🏅OLYCoin Community @olycoin_official · 341,332 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Baby Doge Announcements @babydogecoin · 1,076,739 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@CryptoAirdrop - Crypto Airdrops @CryptoAirdrop · 583,509 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Spell Wallet Updates @spell_wallet · 1,226,044 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
MOONBERG @moonbergai · 311,472 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
DuckChain Announcement @DuckChainAnn · 4,087,980 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Upcoming.. @rr1234685 · 242,192 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
DeepSafe Official Channel @DeepSafe_Official · 1,279,080 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Bitget Wallet Announcements @Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,307,721 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 August 2026
BYIN Channel @byin_fun · 581,025 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
GemsWall Announcement @gemswall · 1,496,568 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 166 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
11 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tabi Announcement” (@tabi_ann), 2,097,431 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tabi_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
