Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 19 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 143 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 May 2024 to 26 December 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -8,948. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,052,650–1,064,282 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:47
1,053,992
-1,300
11 Aug 2026, 19:05
1,055,292
-1,578
10 Aug 2026, 15:36
1,056,870
-1,085
9 Aug 2026, 17:41
1,057,955
-1,339
8 Aug 2026, 17:35
1,059,294
-1,693
7 Aug 2026, 14:21
1,060,987
-1,206
6 Aug 2026, 15:10
1,062,193
-747
6 Aug 2026, 00:41
1,062,940
first reading
Engagement
174 posts held, back to 24 April 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 52 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 174 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4,386 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,703
38.8%
❤
1,481
33.8%
👎
470
10.7%
🔥
445
10.1%
👏
151
3.44%
😁
114
2.60%
🥰
22
0.502%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 173 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115,354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2023 to 26 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
157
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 173 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @league. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 174 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2023 to 26 December 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The Open League Season 7 is Officially Over: Meet the Winners!
The Open League New Year Edition has wrapped up, with the airdrop being distributed yesterday morning by the Open League Santa!
We hope the season brought to your attention some amazing projects. During the 20 days of Season 7, we had a rewarding $1.5M prize pool, with 24 DeFi protocols for teams and users to explore. The results speak for themselves:
…
GM and Merry Christmas, The Open League fam❄️
Our Santa reported to have delivered all the gifts from the $1,5M airdrop pool😏🎁
Have you checked your wallet yet?😛
GM frens! Missing The Open League yet?
While we are finalising the results, why don't you earn more rewards in the TON DeFi campaign on Galxe?
💰$150,000 prize pool, 9 DeFi projects and simple social and onchain tasks.
After The Open League, you will find those quests as easy as ABC🤪
💥 Explore now!
Upcoming Results for DeFi League and the New Year Airdrop Campaign
The season is over! During the last 20 days, 23 amazing teams were competing for best performance and thousands of users were earning points to get a share of the $1,5M airdrop pool.
What’s next? The results of both the DeFi League and the New Year Airdrop campaign are being reviewed and finalised. The numbers that you see in the projects and user l…
The Open League New Year Edition: Final Countdown!
The clock is ticking! With just 3 days left, the intense competition among TON DeFi teams and the $1.5M airdrop campaign are nearing their end. Here’s a snapshot of the amazing achievements so far:
▪️ 499,000 participation badges minted
▪️ $5.5M in new TVL and $115M in total volume generated
▪️ Swap.coffee, Blum, Rainbow.ag leading the charge in the Volume Squad
▪️…
TOL Advent Calendar: 4 days to go
Attention, The Open League adventures! The final countdown for the $1,5M New Year airdrop is now closed – yesterday was the last day to mint your participation badge with over 499,000 DeFi Badges minted in total! Community members still have 4 days to secure extra rewards provided by participating projects!
• • • •
Two more projects offering new gifts, and each contributing to 2%…
GM GM!
How is your morning so far? With these updates from The Open League contestants, it will become even more pleasant 💥😋
🔸TON Hedge celebrates a $300k TVL milestone! ⚡️
🔸Delea reaches the first position in the TVL leaderboard. 🔥
🔸Moki launches a new $2,000 swap competition along with TonCat & SadMeowMP3.
🔸 Rainbow.ag adds new pools for you to swap with a minimum price impact.
🔸 swap.coffee releases a podcas…
TOL Advent Calendar: 5 days to go
Calling all Open League players! You only have 5 days to grow your New Year airdrop score and grab a decent Christmas gift from the $1,5M pool🎅
• • • •
We're also thrilled to unveil two more platforms spearheading DeFi innovation on TON: Blum Memepad & JVault. Both are demonstrating impressive performance in the leaderboards, with Blum ranking 2nd in the Volume Squad, and JVault b…
Good morning, friends!🌟
Start your Thursday with the latest updates from the amazing Open League teams. Stay sharp, stay ahead—let’s dive in!
🔥First of all, we welcome a new contestant of the TVL Squad - CattonFi! Apart from being an innovative CDP and stable swap, CattonFi is also a fascinating game, which makes their mini app one of the first Gamified DeFi products on TON blockchain. Good luck with this fair figh…
🔥31👍26❤7👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @league. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 97,791 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
15
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
15
vacant every time we have ever looked
@league named 15 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@moki_ag named in 15 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@delea_finance named in 14 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@jettontoken_en named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@delea_app_bot named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@jetton_eng named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@web3tontoken named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tonano_announcement named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@bemofinanceeng named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@wall_jetton_en named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jettontokenru named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jettonfarmingbot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tonsociety named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ts_rewards named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jetton_forum named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jvault_chat named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
THE OPEN LEAGUE @theopenleague · 155,553 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Sports Direct @sportsdirect_eng · 411,402 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Ton Raffles En Channel @tonraffles_en · 1,338,925 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
TON Punks @tonpunks · 308,639 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
OOIA - TON NFT Marketplace @ooiaton · 278,108 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Gram of TON @gram · 7,033,222 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 August 2026
CoLabs: coNFT, CoPump, CoPass @co_nft · 153,714 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
EVAA @evaaprotocol · 274,693 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
My Wallet · News @MyWalletEng · 305,833 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
🐲 RoOLZ Ru Channel @RoolzRussia · 1,136,514 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
TONlines – News @tonlines · 460,444 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
GOLDMANN HYDRA Community @Ton_HYDRA_Community · 185,748 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
RoOLZ Gods & Mortals 📣 @roolzGods · 1,383,419 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Programmer ♨️ @programmer · 190,905 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Spintria Community @spintr · 665,142 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Volet.com official @VoletCom · 541,877 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
WEB3 TON DNS Media @web3tondns · 158,100 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Not Meme @notmeme · 160,990 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Startups & Ventures @tech · 2,462,734 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
KKX NEWS @kkxnews · 150,351 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Аудиокниги и книги от Patephone @patephone_audioknigi · 403,461 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
CRYPTO METEORA ☄️ @Crypto_Meteora · 334,318 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Nicegram @nicegramapp · 1,673,013 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
AI Post — Artificial Intelligence @aipost · 740,782 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 99 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Open League” (@league), 1,053,992 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/league.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.