Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 13 days, net -3,262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263,734–267,974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 18:07
264,223
-240
17 Aug 2026, 19:38
264,463
-346
16 Aug 2026, 15:19
264,809
-423
14 Aug 2026, 22:57
265,232
-349
13 Aug 2026, 12:09
265,581
-208
12 Aug 2026, 11:25
265,789
-239
11 Aug 2026, 14:44
266,028
-250
10 Aug 2026, 13:42
266,278
-210
9 Aug 2026, 15:13
266,488
-259
8 Aug 2026, 16:56
266,747
-289
7 Aug 2026, 16:24
267,036
-291
6 Aug 2026, 13:21
267,327
-158
6 Aug 2026, 00:54
267,485
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:02
267,485
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.824%
avg views ÷ 264,223 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,180
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
28 (13 July 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
47,888
Reactions total
697
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,130
Videos
≈2
Links
≈1,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
847 reactions across 27 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
241
28.5%
👍
237
28.0%
🔥
200
23.6%
🤯
30
3.54%
👏
24
2.83%
😢
24
2.83%
🤔
24
2.83%
🎉
23
2.72%
💯
20
2.36%
🏆
9
1.06%
🤬
5
0.59%
😁
4
0.472%
🤩
4
0.472%
🍌
1
0.118%
💔
1
0.118%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 863reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 28 we hold a reading for · 57%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thedailyton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🍌 Is TON Core building the engine for Gram Wallet?
⚫️ A curious repository has appeared on the GitHub profile of TON Core developer Petr Makhnev: wallet-engine. It’s a Rust library that implements the core logic of a TON wallet, including Wallet V5R1 creation and import, transaction history, sending transactions, and more. V5R1 is TON’s latest general-purpose wallet standard, so the terminology here is consistent wi…
🖊 Interview with Resistor, TON’s biggest Web3 builder
⚫️️️️ Over the past year, Resistor has single-handedly built an entire suite of Resistance tools on TON — many of which we’ve covered before: Resistance Tools, Tonnet Browser, Teleton Agent, gateways for TON Sites, tools for TON Storage, ZK pools, and other infrastructure.
⚫️️️️ Right now, Resistor needs financial support to keep working independently on these t…
✈️ Happy birthday, Telegram!
⚫️ Telegram turns 13 today. As Pavel Durov noted, for most of its history, Telegram has ranked among the world’s ten most downloaded mobile apps.
⚫️ For us, as for many TON enthusiasts, this day is special for another reason: without Telegram, TON would probably not exist in its current form. Over the past few years, Telegram has gone from an outside observer to the main force shaping t…
🪙 Is Telegram making Gram Wallet harder to block?
⚫️ Telegram Desktop developer John Preston has published tproxy-server, an experimental web proxy for Telegram. Preston says he vibe-coded the project, and the repo itself describes it as a proof of concept, but the idea is laid out pretty clearly in the documentation.
⚫️ Normally, the Telegram client connects directly to Telegram’s servers. With an MTProto Proxy en…
❤️ What does Telegram have in store for its birthday?
⚫️ It’s only Wednesday, but we’re already looking ahead to Friday. Telegram turns 13 on August 14 — the first version of the app launched on iOS on that day back in 2013.
⚫️ This year, the date is especially interesting for the TON community. In July, Pavel Durov promised the largest rollout of a non-custodial crypto wallet in history, saying that a native Gram …
🍌 How scammers are making up a new biography for Nikolai Durov
⚫️ Over the past few weeks, mentions of a mysterious AI project called VISION, supposedly linked to Nikolai Durov, have been popping up here and there. As part of our #antiscam series, we decided to take a closer look — and what we found is a pretty unusual example of just how far scammers are willing to go to make a fake project look legitimate.
⚫️ The…
💡 Why is TON disappearing from project names?
⚫️ A curious migration plan appeared in Tonkeeper’s repository today: the wallet is preparing to move its web app from wallet.tonkeeper.com to app.keeperwallet.com. We haven’t seen any official rebranding announcement yet, but the commit was deleted shortly after it appeared, so there’s a good chance Tonkeeper could soon become Keeper Wallet.
⚫️ This wouldn’t be the fir…
🍌 Is Telegram preparing to launch NFT stickers?
⚫️ Hard to believe, but it has already been more than two years since Telegram first teased NFT stickers and emoji. Back in spring 2024, Pavel Durov said at TOKEN2049 that Telegram planned to tokenize stickers and emoji, with their creators receiving 95% of the sales revenue.
⚫️ Durov used the famous “Haha, classic” duck as an example. The sticker had already spread f…
📉 How much has TON changed in a year?
⚫️ It has been over two months since Pavel Durov announced MTONGA’s fourth step. The transition was supposed to take around three weeks, yet the fifth step has still not been announced. Meanwhile, the upcoming self-custodial wallet built into Telegram makes no mention of MTONGA and may well be a separate initiative altogether.
⚫️ So the ecosystem is once again waiting for its n…
⌨️ How to rent storage on TON Storage
⚫️ Last summer, we covered MyTonProvider — a tool that lets server owners rent out spare disk space and earn TON. According to TON Core developers, the decentralized storage network is primarily used to distribute archival copies of the TON blockchain, although it can store virtually any type of file.
⚫️ Say you need to keep a file available without relying on a single hosting …
🍌 JUST IN: Apple Support says Telegram has been temporarily removed from the App Store due to violations involving inappropriate content.
It remains unclear what specific content triggered the removal.
UPD: On contrast, there is another message from Apple Store Support clarifying the app was hidden intentionally by the app developer.
@thedailyton
❤6🤬4😢2👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @thedailyton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 5,080 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TON Diamonds NFT @tondiamonds · 136,978 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
xRocket News @xrocketnews · 236,471 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
CashFlow‘s Calls @CashFlowsCalls · 534,959 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
TON Status @tonstatus · 162,562 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Battles @battlesjam · 401,522 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
TonDreamer Eng @TonDreamerEng · 784,130 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Fasttoken News @fasttoken_news · 128,220 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 306,645 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
<\> Sharding, TON's, two Jetons </>. @ton2keng · 630,218 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
Ton Raffles En Channel @tonraffles_en · 1,323,227 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
TON Community @toncommunitychannel · 805,262 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Getgems NFT @getgems · 277,270 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
All About TON @all_aboutTon · 155,764 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
GT Protocol Announcements Channel @GTProtocolNews · 255,430 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
TON Покер Новости @tonpokerroomnews · 202,803 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
ChainGPT Official Announcements Channel @ChainGPTNews · 409,122 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
GameGPT | Announcements @gamegptANN · 123,966 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Web3 Pulse @web_3_pulse · 149,478 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
the noton @thenoton · 761,840 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Web3Key @Web3key_eng · 472,645 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
EVAA @evaaprotocol · 273,318 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Tonologia Eng @tonologiaENG · 698,587 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
TON News @new_ton_news · 196,533 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Daily TON | News” (@thedailyton), 264,223 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedailyton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.