The GTA 6 Leak & Crypto Scam: How 'CyberLeek' Fooled the Gaming World A hacker group calling themselves CyberLeek breached Rockstar’s servers, leaking confidential gameplay footage and maps of Grand Theft Auto VI. What followed was total chaos. The Hype & Ransom: CyberLeek watermarked every leaked clip with a QR code, threatening to leak more internal files, including the game's prologue. They used a psychological …

Channel
teleintel
@teleintel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,531subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002219157713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @teleintel @teleSyndicate |
| Description | Ultimate intel for Telegram & TON ecosystem & crypto updates. Global news on AI, cyber trade, crime, tech breakthroughs & real Web3 earn opportunities. Fully Telegram-focused news channel covering real-time updates & scam stories Owner @sbtid |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teleintel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 52,531 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 52,531 | +52,530 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 1 | -50,853 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 50,854 | -231 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 51,085 | -247 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 51,332 | -437 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 51,769 | -527 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 52,296 | -169 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 52,465 | -321 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 52,786 | -207 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 52,993 | -358 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 53,351 | +743 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 52,608 | -498 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 53,106 | -270 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 53,376 | -223 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 53,599 | +841 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 52,758 | -272 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 53,030 | -228 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 53,258 | +872 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 52,386 | first reading |
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.4%
- avg views ÷ 52,531 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14,400
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (14 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 389,140 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 135
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 37
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
bro leaves the private channel first, clears the chat for both sides, blocks every model line by line, uninstalls telegram, throws his phone onto the bed, turns on the vacuum cleaner to drown out the sorrow, and starts crying hysterically in the corner....😭 all because the stream lagged for a microsecond right when he realized he just dropped $100 in USDT to watch a 2018 pre-recorded video that’s already available f…
Doing IG / FB / WP lookups. 😍 Instagram 🌐 Facebook 📍 WhatsApp Rep active. • Email / Number Both • Old UI access • Post & story history • Associated devices • Predicted locations • Account insights • Linked emails Also Available: • FB admin emails • WhatsApp group info Fast turnaround. Serious inquiries only. DM 📨 @glocky Channel @reinstatement ( Paid Ad )
Sponsor paid heavy cash, we dropped the ad! Now it's over This paid promotional post is now CLOSED. Time's up, let's get back to productive things now!
( Paid Ad )
Posted without readable text
( Paid Ad )
Ayo cabrones, straight up zero energy today, lying in bed eating chips and completely unbothered 😎 Too lazy to dig up market news today, so this comment section is officially the newsfeed What wild stuff is happening around you or across the world right now? Did you get scammed, or were you the one pulling the scam? Did your girlfriend dump you, or did you cheat on her? What’s going down in crypto, tech, or AI righ…
( Paid Ad )
Sponsor loaded my wallet, I loaded the ad. Mission accomplished! This paid promotion has officially ENDED. Back to reality and productive content now!
Who the f* is this pathetic 14-year-old kid sending bots to my channel and group? You lowlife piece of s*, do you seriously think you are doing something big here? I see your exact pathetic pattern, you motherfer: Every single time I post a promo ad for a client, you trigger a bot raid. Whether you are a jealous hater, a toxic competitor, some broke loser, or some motherfing anti-bot bot owner who wants to sell thei…
Sponsor got the views, I got the cash. Win-win! This promotional post is now EXPIRED
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @teleintel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@teleintel edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 27 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 902,933 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@SableIndex · 8712 postsStoke
@stoke · 1,4512 postsc4stle b0yz
@castle · 14,9441 postPavel Durov
@durov · 10,975,1281 postgramSyndicate
@gramSyndicate · 11 post𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗡𝗢𝗛𝗨𝗕 🔞
@m0dels_only · 2,2401 postMonkey Gang
@monkey · 461 postMRKT
@mrkt · 462,5451 postNule's Channel
@nuleportal · 9271 postㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
@oktapus · 1,0561 postPLUSH PEPE
@plushpepe · 9,3461 postPLUSH PEPE SALES
@plushpepesales · 7,9661 postreinstatement
@reinstatement · 2,2551 postX﹏X
@the_accepter · 3001 posttrx
@trxbot · 31 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@teleintel named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 22 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 15 posts, 8 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@autoruss · 858,695#1
@theTapCoins · 3,023,406#2
@seedupdates · 8,557,223#3
@ismaalphamoney · 58,335#4
@combobestchannel · 222,692#5
@geostakeio · 198,536#6
@blumcrypto · 15,026,366#7
@hamster_kombat · 21,520,459#8
@onus_globalchannel · 1,703,128#9
@BlockWawe_cr · 175,704#10
@hayzonn · 2,941,947#11
@fx_holding_community · 6,315,482#12
@catizenann · 3,696,598#13
@mediarussia · 1,507,062#14
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 143,794#15
@vestirussia · 1,019,283#16
@TaskNChannel · 942,399#17
@undergroundinvestors · 8,110#18
@battle_games_com · 2,780,752#19
@watbird · 1,518,778#20
@gameechannel · 1,950,862#21
@dcombo · 176,366#22
@pigscrew · 2,207,158#23
@realgoats_channel · 4,869,098#24
@boomloudcoin · 1,713,399#25
@trendingapps · 3,915,457#26
@tomarket_ai · 6,951,708#27
@catapult_extreme · 8,871,531#28
@hexnio · 2,056,155#29
@coincoinai · 1,826,439#30
@dogs · 7,287,192#31
@obixtoken · 545,030#32
@catgoldminerann · 934,666#33
@boinkersnews · 2,667,698#34
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,257,660#35
@theyescoin · 5,986,665#36
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,138,210#37
@nomis_protocol · 1,593,466#38
@the_vertus · 2,208,331#39
@Birds_announcement · 1,589,242#40
@notcoin · 8,968,647#41
@hipofinance · 772,412#42
@rockyrabbitio · 3,595,671#43
@Monkey_on_TON · 845,125#44
@Frogmatesannouncement · 122,182#45
@lenvies · 1,613,549#46
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,518,579#47
@tonstationgames · 3,302,244#48
@Cats_housewtf · 8,319,075#49
@token_1win · 3,070,684#50
@hotonnear · 4,813,776#51
@omegazoon · 23,214#52
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,272,547#53
@tapraccooncoin · 179,742#54
@Coin_Strategist · 1,076,921#55
@swopin · 75,126#56
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,264,592#57
@catidpaw · 226,021#58
@gram · 6,857,755#59
@monorixofficial · 1,377,373#60
@dotcoincommunity · 4,108,937#61
@iamalexfalcon · 3,212,656#62
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,119,376#63
@CryptoAirdrop · 564,877#64
@FarmGo_News · 202,864#65
@diamoremarket · 341,999#66
@tons_base · 499,724#67
@poveldurev · 298,882#68
@smpl_app · 1,669,371#69
@dailycomboishere · 404,477#70
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,180,929#71
@tapswapai · 10,650,300#72
@cryptoranknews · 698,665#73
@therealyescoin · 2,147,385#74
@deckforge_official · 2,135,488#75
@billion_wallet · 251,034#76
@bullishfarmgame · 295,585#77
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,601,776#78
@zigzagworld · 52,857#79
@EraOfExplorers · 735,469#80
@hash_cats · 2,166,180#81
@TapcCombo · 4,662#82
@corn_battles · 1,071,136#83
@banana_update · 1,437,757#84
@CherryTrendingEVM · 889,327#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BlockWawe_cr · 175,704
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@ismaalphamoney · 58,335
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@poveldurev · 298,882
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@dcombo · 176,366
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@AnimeAIua · 38,982
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 31 August 2026
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 143,794
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@hipofinance · 772,412
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
@dyorninja · 59,071
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
@swopin · 75,126
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@ekonobicom · 56,013
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“teleintel” (@teleintel), 52,531 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teleintel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.